Biphasic constitutive laws for biological interface evolution

Abstract A model of tissue differentiation at the bone–implant interface is proposed. The basic hypothesis of the model is that the mechanical environment determines the tissue differentiation. The stimulus chosen is related to the bone–implant micromotions. Equations governing the evolution of the interfacial tissue are proposed and combined with a finite element code to determine the evolution of the fibrous tissue around prostheses. The model is applied to the case of an idealized hip prosthesis.

[1]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  W. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C++: The Art of Scientific Computing (2nd edn)1 Numerical Recipes Example Book (C++) (2nd edn)2 Numerical Recipes Multi-Language Code CD ROM with LINUX or UNIX Single-Screen License Revised Version3 , 2003 .

[3]  M. Laval-jeantet,et al.  Importance of measurement of spongious vertebral bone mineral density in the assessment of osteoporosis. , 1987, Bone.

[4]  S. Cowin,et al.  On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  W. Harris,et al.  In Vivo Skeletal Responses to Porous-Surfaced Implants Subjected to Small Induced Motions* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  S. Cowin,et al.  Bone remodeling I: theory of adaptive elasticity , 1976 .

[7]  A. Curnier.  Computational methods in solid mechanics , 1994 .

[8]  C. V. van Noorden,et al.  Mechanical compression of a fibrous membrane surrounding bone causes bone resorption. , 1999, Acta histochemica.

[9]  A. Terrier,et al.  Adaptation Models of Anisotropic Bone. , 1997, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[10]  H Weinans,et al.  Effects of fit and bonding characteristics of femoral stems on adaptive bone remodeling. , 1994, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  Jacques Corbeil,et al.  Effect of micromechanical stimulations on osteoblasts: development of a device simulating the mechanical situation at the bone-implant interface. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  J B Brunski,et al.  The Influence of Functional Use of Endosseous Dental Implants on the Tissue-implant Interface. II. Clinical Aspects , 1979, Journal of dental research.

[13]  S. Goodman,et al.  The effects of micromotion and particulate materials on tissue differentiation. Bone chamber studies in rabbits. , 1994, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[14]  Gerhard A. Holzapfel,et al.  Nonlinear Solid Mechanics: A Continuum Approach for Engineering Science , 2000 .

[15]  H Weinans,et al.  Trends of mechanical consequences and modeling of a fibrous membrane around femoral hip prostheses. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  L Ryd,et al.  Wear particle diffusion and tissue differentiation in TKA implant fibrous interfaces. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  C. Bünger,et al.  Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite‐coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  C. Bünger,et al.  Hydroxyapatite coating modifies implant membrane formation. Controlled micromotion studied in dogs. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[19]  J. Ball.  Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity , 1976 .

[20]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces , 1997 .

[21]  P. Flory,et al.  Thermodynamic relations for high elastic materials , 1961 .

[22]  J. Lewis,et al.  Mechanical properties of the fibrous tissue found at the bone-cement interface following total joint replacement. , 1982, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[23]  A. Burstein,et al.  The elastic modulus for bone. , 1974, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  R M Pilliar,et al.  Initial healing in the dog of submerged versus non-submerged porous-coated endosseous dental implants. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[25]  R. D. de Kleine,et al.  Short periods of oscillating fluid pressure directed at a titanium-bone interface in rabbits lead to bone lysis. , 1998, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[26]  L Ryd,et al.  Mechanical influences on tissue differentiation at bone-cement interfaces. , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[27]  D P Pioletti,et al.  The cytotoxic effect of titanium particles phagocytosed by osteoblasts. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[28]  S D Cook,et al.  Histologic Analysis of Retrieved Human Porous‐Coated Total Joint Components , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces , 1997 .

[30]  S. Pollack,et al.  The influence of functional use of endosseous dental implants on the tissue-implant interface. II. Clinical aspects. , 1979, Journal of dental research.

[31]  A Farron,et al.  [Total knee prosthesis. Clinical and numerical study of micromovements of the tibial implant]. , 1995, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[32]  P. Aspenberg,et al.  Periprosthetic bone resorption. Particles versus movement. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[33]  Dennis R. Carter,et al.  Mechanobiology of Skeletal Regeneration , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  R. Marti,et al.  Fluid Pressure Causes Bone Resorption in a Rabbit Model of Prosthetic Loosening , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  P. Aspenberg,et al.  Pressure‐induced periprosthetic osteolysis: A rat model , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.