Evaluation of different cochlear implants in unilateral hearing patients during word listening tasks: A brain connectivity study

Advanced methodologies used for the biomedical signal interpretation allow using cerebral signals to assess important cognitive functions in humans. In the present study, as parameter of cerebral effort, has been employed the isolated effective coherence, in order to estimate the effective connectivity and network organization. The hypothesis was that the lower the number of inter-connections engaged, the lower the cerebral effort induced by the experimental condition. In the present research this index has been applied to test the reaction to the use of different cochlear implant processors (Freedom, CP810 and CP910 - Cochlear Ltd), with the aim to identify the most performing device during a word in noise recognition task. Results support the capability of identifying the device eliciting less brain area connections. In particular, the CP910 was the processor inducing the lower number of inter-connections among the tested ones. This investigation appeared to be worthy, since representing a tool to identify devices that would make available user's cognitive resources for additional tasks, a matter susceptible of generalization to various fields of application. The employment of the cerebral signals therefore open the way to the evaluation of the impact of different sensors and prosthetic devices, also using connectivity measures.

[1]  Fabio Babiloni,et al.  Mental workload estimations in unilateral deafened children , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[2]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Assessing direct paths of intracortical causal information flow of oscillatory activity with the isolated effective coherence (iCoh) , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[3]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB, SIFT, NFT, BCILAB, and ERICA: New Tools for Advanced EEG Processing , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[4]  F. Babiloni,et al.  Brain Network Analysis From High-Resolution EEG Recordings by the Application of Theoretical Graph Indexes , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Andreas Büchner,et al.  On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  The signal-cognition interface: interactions between degraded auditory signals and cognitive processes. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[7]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Quantitative EEG and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in Alzheimer's disease: a correlative study , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  F Cincotti,et al.  Mapping of early and late human somatosensory evoked brain potentials to phasic galvanic painful stimulation , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Giuseppe Attanasio,et al.  Sleep Architecture Variation in Chronic Tinnitus Patients , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Wolfgang Gaggl,et al.  Recognition of Speech Presented at Soft to Loud Levels by Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients of Three Cochlear Implant Systems , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[11]  G. Borghini,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews , 2022 .

[12]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[13]  Stefan J. Mauger,et al.  A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus(®) 6 system. , 2016, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[14]  S Pozzi,et al.  A passive brain-computer interface application for the mental workload assessment on professional air traffic controllers during realistic air traffic control tasks. , 2016, Progress in brain research.

[15]  Stefan J. Mauger,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the Nucleus® 6 cochlear implant system: Performance improvements with SmartSound iQ , 2014, International journal of audiology.

[16]  D. Başkent,et al.  Listening effort with cochlear implant simulations. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[17]  Elina Mäki-Torkko,et al.  A longitudinal study of the bilateral benefit in children with bilateral cochlear implants , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[18]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[19]  Marco Pelizzone,et al.  Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Garrett Cardon,et al.  Developmental and cross-modal plasticity in deafness: evidence from the P1 and N1 event related potentials in cochlear implanted children. , 2015, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.