Imaging of small high-density structures in CT A phantom study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this work is to study how the limited spatial resolution of a computed tomographic (CT) system affects the imaging of small high-density structures. This knowledge is relevant not only to understand and interpret clinical data, but also to apply and develop quantification methods for calcifications and stented vessels. MATERIALS AND METHODS A dedicated phantom containing small differently sized aluminum cylinders was imaged on a 64-slice multidetector row CT (MDCT) while varying acquisition and reconstruction parameters from a high-resolution protocol. In addition, a bead phantom was imaged to estimate the point spread function (PSF) for the different parameter settings. The accuracy in determining object density and size was established for various imaging protocols and compared with simulations based on the estimated PSF. RESULTS Attenuation values and size measurements were accurate for objects larger than two times the size of the system PSF at the full-width-at-half-maximum. For smaller objects, attenuation values were increasingly underestimated and size was increasingly overestimated. The convolution kernel had the most influence on object signal and size. Use of edge-enhancing kernels yielded more accurate size measurements and higher signal for small objects. However, their application was constrained by noise amplification and edge-ringing artifacts, which led to lower signal-to-noise ratio, degrading the visualization of low densities and small high-density objects. CONCLUSION Results presented in this report provide insight into limitations in the quantification of small high-density structures and their effect on the visualization of surrounding tissues with recently developed MDCT systems.

[1]  K. Rossmann.  Point spread-function, line spread-function, and modulation transfer function. Tools for the study of imaging systems. , 1969, Radiology.

[2]  W D Wagner,et al.  A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. , 1995, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[3]  C. Becker,et al.  Visualization and quantification of coronary calcifications with electron beam and spiral computed tomography , 2000, European Radiology.

[4]  Ming Jiang,et al.  Spatial variation of resolution and noise in multi-detector row spiral CT. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[5]  Y Shen,et al.  The use of deblurring technique for improving the longitudinal resolution in helical CT of the head and neck region. , 1997, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[6]  G H Glover,et al.  Theoretical Resolution of Computed Tomography Systems , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  George Dangas,et al.  Update on In-stent Restenosis. , 2001, Current interventional cardiology reports.

[8]  Rik Stokking,et al.  Improving the imaging of calcifications in CT by histogram-based selective deblurring , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[9]  H Hu,et al.  Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction. , 1999, Medical physics.

[10]  W D Wagner,et al.  A definition of initial, fatty streak, and intermediate lesions of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. , 1994, Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology.

[11]  W. Kalender,et al.  Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  H. Genant,et al.  Accuracy of CT-based thickness measurement of thin structures: modeling of limited spatial resolution in all three dimensions. , 2002, Medical physics.

[13]  Willi A. Kalender,et al.  Computed tomography : fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications , 2000 .

[14]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Spatial domain filtering for fast modification of the tradeoff between image sharpness and pixel noise in computed tomography , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  C M Langton,et al.  A phantom for evaluating bone mineral density of the hand by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. , 1997, Physiological measurement.

[16]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Restenosis detected by routine angiographic follow-up and late mortality after coronary stent placement. , 2004, American heart journal.

[17]  Beadenkopf Wg,et al.  CALCIFICATION IN THE CORONARY ARTERIES AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO ARTERIOSCLEROSIS AND MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. , 1964 .

[18]  Matthew A. Kupinski,et al.  Objective Assessment of Image Quality , 2005 .

[19]  W. Kalender,et al.  Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography , 2003, European Radiology.

[20]  N Haas,et al.  Digital radiography. A predictor of regenerate bone stiffness in distraction osteogenesis. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  D H Blankenhorn,et al.  A definition of the intima of human arteries and of its atherosclerosis-prone regions. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. , 1992, Circulation.

[22]  Rita F. Redberg.  Coronary Artery Calcium Should We Rely on This Surrogate Marker , 2006 .

[23]  G. Dougherty,et al.  Limitations of clinical CT in assessing cortical thickness and density. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  H H Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Advances in cardiac CT imaging: 64-slice scanner , 2004, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[26]  G Wang,et al.  Longitudinal image deblurring in spiral CT. , 1994, Radiology.

[27]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Spatial domain image filtering in computed tomography: feasibility study in pulmonary embolism , 2003, European Radiology.

[28]  W. Kalender,et al.  Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. , 1992, Radiology.

[29]  C H McCollough,et al.  Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. , 1999, Medical physics.

[30]  Peter M T Pattynama,et al.  Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. , 2003, Radiology.

[31]  R. Detrano,et al.  Calcified coronary artery plaque measurement with cardiac CT in population-based studies: standardized protocol of Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. , 2005, Radiology.

[32]  H. Gissler,et al.  Endoluminal Treatment of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis , 2001, World Journal of Surgery.

[33]  Michael W. Vannier,et al.  The effect of pitch in multislice spiral/helical CT , 1999 .

[34]  W A Kalender,et al.  Measurement of slice sensitivity profiles in spiral CT. , 1994, Medical physics.

[35]  V. Fuster,et al.  Coronary artery calcification: pathophysiology, epidemiology, imaging methods, and clinical implications. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group. , 1996, Circulation.

[36]  M. Reiser,et al.  Coronary artery calcium: absolute quantification in nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT studies. , 2002, Radiology.