The impact of acoustic noise found within clinical departments on radiology performance.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the impact of environmental factors such as ambient light on radiologist performance. One commonly encountered distractor found within all clinical departments that has received little or no attention is acoustic noise. MATERIALS AND METHODS The present work records the level of noises encountered within environments where radiologic images are viewed and establishes the impact of a clinically relevant level of noise on the ability of radiologists to perform a typical diagnostic task. Noise levels were recorded 10 times within each of 14 environments, 11 of which were locations where radiologic images are judged. Thirty chest images were then presented to 26 senior radiologists, who were asked to detect up to three nodular lesions within 30 posteroanterior chest x-ray images in the absence and presence of noise at an amplitude demonstrated in the clinical environment. Jackknife free-response receiver-operating characteristic analyses was performed on the free-response data. RESULTS The results demonstrated that noise amplitudes rarely exceeded that encountered with normal conversation with the maximum mean value for an image-viewing environment being 56.1 dB. This level of noise had no impact on the ability of radiologists to identify chest lesions with figure of merits of 0.68, 0.69, and 0.68 with noise and 0.65, 0.68, and 0.67 without noise for chest radiologists, nonchest radiologists, and all radiologists, respectively. Equally, no differences were seen for false-positive and false-negative scores or on the time required to judge the images. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that noise at levels encountered within areas where radiologic images are viewed is not a major distractor within the reporting environment, but the need for further work has been identified.

[1]  Kalpana M Kanal,et al.  Computed radiography dose data mining and surveillance as an ongoing quality assurance improvement process. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  Philine Wangemann,et al.  Supporting sensory transduction: cochlear fluid homeostasis and the endocochlear potential , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  P. Brennan,et al.  Do CEC guidelines under-utilise the full potential of increasing kVp as a dose-reducing tool? , 2003, European Radiology.

[4]  Edivaldo Cremer,et al.  Noise level in a 222 bed hospital in the 18th health region - PR. , 2007, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.

[5]  Jonathan M Kracht,et al.  Noise in the operating rooms of Johns Hopkins Hospital. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  James E West,et al.  Noise in the adult emergency department of Johns Hopkins Hospital. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Elizabeth A Krupinski,et al.  Digital radiography image quality: image processing and display. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Radiology.

[8]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Why and how is soft copy reading possible in clinical practice? , 1999, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[9]  Mark McEntee,et al.  A software system for the simulation of chest lesions , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[10]  M. H. Otenio,et al.  Intensidade de ruído em hospital de 222 leitos na 18ª Regional de Saúde - PR , 2007 .

[11]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. , 2005, Medical physics.

[12]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Soft-Copy Reading of Digital Chest Radiographs: Effect of Ambient Light and Automatic Optimization of Monitor Luminance , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[13]  David J Manning,et al.  Ambient lighting: effect of illumination on soft-copy viewing of radiographs of the wrist. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[15]  Some Clinical Implications of Recent Experiments on the Psychology of Hearing , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[16]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. , 2004, Medical physics.