Endothelial Cell Density in Donor Corneas: A Comparison of Automatic Software Programs With Manual Counting

Purpose: Several automated systems have become available to determine endothelial cell density (ECD) of donor corneas. The purpose of this study was the comparison of 2 systems, the Endothelial Analysis System EAT V1.4 (Rhinetec, Duesseldorf, Germany) and the NAVIS Cell Count Version 3.4.1 (Nidek Technologies, Erlangen, Germany), against manual ECD counts. Methods: During organ culture, the endothelium of 50 human corneas was photographed on both conventional film and digitally. Manual fixed-frame counting was performed on 2 photographs by 3 experienced ophthalmologists. Three digital pictures of each cornea were analyzed semiautomatically on the Rhinetec EAT system V1.4. Images were imported and analyzed by the fully automatic mode of the NAVIS system V3.4.1 (which also offers a semiautomatic counting mode). In an additional experiment on 11 corneas, the NAVIS counts on the microscopy system previously used only for manual cell counts were directly compared with manual counts. Results: Mean endothelial cell density obtained by manual counting of all observers was 2679 ± 313 (SD) cells/mm2. Values obtained by digital analysis with EAT were a mean of 1.3% higher (2713 ± 286 cells/mm2), which is not a significant difference. In contrast, analysis of the digital pictures with the fully automated NAVIS software mode showed a mean of 7.0% higher measurements (2867 ± 111 cells/ mm2), a significant difference (P = 0.0001). Altman-Bland analysis revealed that the fully automated NAVIS counts gave too low results for high ECDs and too high results for low ECDs. This result was confirmed by the direct comparison with manual counting. Conclusions: Fully automated analysis of ECD remains problematic. Validation of any computer-assisted system against manual counting is of importance.

[1]  B. Seitz,et al.  Reproduzierbarkeit und Validität eines neuen automatisierten Verfahrens der spiegelmikroskopischen Hornhautendothelanalyse , 1997, Der Ophthalmologe.

[2]  Andrew D Dick,et al.  Predicting endothelial cell loss and long-term corneal graft survival. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  Erhard Godehardt,et al.  Wissensbasierte Bildanalyse des Endothels von Hornhauttransplantaten , 1999 .

[4]  D. Hodge,et al.  Initial endothelial cell density and chronic endothelial cell loss rate in corneal transplants with late endothelial failure. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[5]  B. Seitz,et al.  [Reproducibility and validity of a new automatic method of specular microscopy analysis of corneal endothelium]. , 1997, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[6]  P Gain,et al.  Is manual counting of corneal endothelial cell density in eye banks still acceptable? The French experience , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  M. Böhnke.  Ein neues System zur Lagerung von Spenderhornhäuten , 1991 .

[8]  P. Gain,et al.  Automated tri-image analysis of stored corneal endothelium , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  W. M. Bourne.  Cellular Changes in Transplanted Human Corneas , 2001, Cornea.

[10]  M. Stur,et al.  Automated digital image analysis of organ culture preserved donor corneas. , 1993, Ophthalmic research.

[11]  E. Pels,et al.  Eye banking in Europe 1991-1995. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[12]  P. Gain,et al.  Prospective, Randomized Clinical and Endothelial Evaluation of 2 Storage Times for Corneal Donor Tissue in Organ Culture at 31°C , 2003 .

[13]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[14]  M. Böhnke.  [A new system for storing donor corneas]. , 1991, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[15]  P. Gain,et al.  Urgent Need for Normalization of Corneal Graft Quality Controls in French Eye Banks , 2004, Transplantation.

[16]  E. Godehardt,et al.  [Endothelial evaluation of corneal transplants by digital imaging]. , 1999, Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde.

[17]  P. Gain,et al.  Prospective, randomized clinical and endothelial evaluation of 2 storage times for cornea donor tissue in organ culture at 31 degrees C. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  J. F. Brenner,et al.  Automated morphometric analysis of corneal endothelial cells. , 1981, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  H. Edelhauser,et al.  Increased endothelial cell density in the paracentral and peripheral regions of the human cornea. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.