SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE AND THE EVOLUTION OF MATING SYSTEMS

Abstract Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) have been shown to increase the costs of multiple mating and therefore favor relatively monogamous mating strategies. We examine another way in which STDs can influence mating systems in species in which female choice is important. Because more popular males are more likely to become infected, STDs can counteract any selective pressure that generates strong mating skews. We build two models to investigate female mate choice when the sexual behavior of females determines the prevalence of infection in the population. The first model has no explicit social structure. The second model considers the spatial distribution of matings under social monogamy, when females mated to unattractive males seek extrapair fertilizations from attractive males. In both cases, the STD has the potential to drastically reduce the mating skew. However, this reduction does not always happen. If the per contact transmission probability is low, the disease dies out and is of no consequence. In contrast, if the transmission probability is very high, males are likely to be infected regardless of their attractiveness, and mating with the most attractive males imposes again no extra cost for the female. We also show that optimal female responses to the risk of STDs can buffer the prevalence of infection to remain constant, or even decrease, with increasing per contact transmission probabilities. In all cases considered, the feedback between mate choice strategies and STD prevalence creates frequency-dependent fitness benefits for the two alternative female phenotypes considered (choosy vs. randomly mating females or faithful vs. unfaithful females). This maintains mixed evolutionarily stable strategies or polymorphisms in female behavior. In this way, a sexually transmitted disease can stabilize the populationwide proportion of females that mate with the most attractive males or that seek extrapair copulations.

[1]  M. Boots,et al.  The evolution of risky behaviour in the presence of a sexually transmitted disease , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  R. Holmes,et al.  Microsatellite identification of extrapair sires in a socially monogamous warbler , 2001 .

[3]  P. Sherman,et al.  Social mating systems and extrapair fertilizations in passerine birds , 2001 .

[4]  H. Reeve,et al.  Extra-pair paternity as the result of reproductive transactions between paired mates , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  A. Poiani,et al.  Sexually Transmitted Diseases: A Possible Cost of Promiscuity in Birds? , 2000 .

[6]  A. Dobson,et al.  Sexually transmitted diseases in polygynous mating systems: prevalence and impact on reproductive success , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited Review , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[8]  A. Poiani,et al.  Cloacal microparasites and sexual selection in three Australian passerine species , 2000 .

[9]  A. Møller Male parental care, female reproductive success, and extrapair paternity , 2000 .

[10]  D. Westneat,et al.  Copulation exposes female Red-winged Blackbirds to bacteria in male semen , 2000 .

[11]  K. Norris,et al.  Ecological immunology: life history trade-offs and immune defense in birds , 2000 .

[12]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  Cuckoldry and the stability of biparental care , 1999 .

[13]  R. Knell SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE AND PARASITE‐MEDIATED SEXUAL SELECTION , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  W. Potts,et al.  The Evolution of Mating Preferences and Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[15]  Siva‐Jothy,et al.  Towards a functional understanding of “good genes” , 1998 .

[16]  M. Lombardo On the Evolution of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Birds , 1998 .

[17]  M. Petrie,et al.  The degree of extra-pair paternity increases with genetic variability. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  W. Mackey,et al.  Establishing a link between cultural evolution and sexually transmitted diseases. , 1997, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[20]  C. Loehle The pathogen transmission avoidance theory of sexual selection , 1997 .

[21]  J. Bever,et al.  Sexual Transmission of Disease and Host Mating Systems: Within-Season Reproductive Success , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[22]  B. Conger Book Review:The Literature of Crop Science. Wallace C. Olsen , 1996 .

[23]  P. Thrall,et al.  SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES IN ANIMALS: ECOLOGICAL AND EVOLUTIONARY IMPLICATIONS , 1996, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[24]  Craig Loehle,et al.  Social barriers to pathogen transmission in wild animal populations , 1995 .

[25]  B. Stutchbury,et al.  The Effect of Breeding Synchrony On Extra-Pair Mating Systems in Songbirds , 1995 .

[26]  A. Møller Sexual Selection and the Barn Swallow , 1994 .

[27]  A. Møller,et al.  Cuckoldry and Sociality: A Comparative Study of Birds , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[28]  B. Sheldon,et al.  Sexually transmitted disease in birds: occurrence and evolutionary significance. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high-quality males in the blue tit , 1992, Nature.

[30]  King K. Holmes,et al.  Research issues in human behavior and sexually transmitted diseases in the AIDS era , 1991 .

[31]  W. Hamilton Mate Choice Near or Far , 1990 .

[32]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? , 1982, Science.

[33]  W. J. Freeland Pathogens and the Evolution of Primate Sociality , 1976 .