Indirect water demand of dairy farm buildings

Water is needed in agriculture not only to ensure plant growth and to feed livestock, but also indirectly in pre-chains to produce machines, equipment, buildings and operating materials. This water is referred to as indirect water. The focus of this article is on the indirect water demand for farm buildings in milk production, which was assessed for the first time. Four standardized barn types for dairy cows, a young cattle barn, a calf barn, and storage facilities were investigated. The materials and masses of each building type and equipment were determined. The water needed in the process of material production was taken from the Ecoinvent database. The indirect water demand for livestock houses ranges from 1.4 to 1.9 m³ animal place -1 yr -1 and varies marginally between barn variants. For calf houses and young cattle houses, indirect water demand ranges from 0.3 to 0.8 m³ animal place -1 yr -1 . The demand for indirect water for technical equipment ranges from 0.2 to 0.7 m³ animal place -1 yr -1 . The indirect water demand for storage ranges from 0.01 to 0.5 m 3 m -3 yr -1 . Related to milk production, the indirect water demand is with 0.3 L kg -1 milk negligibly low.

[1]  B. Ridoutt,et al.  Short communication: The water footprint of dairy products: case study involving skim milk powder. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  Simone Kraatz.  Ermittlung der Energieeffizienz in der Tierhaltung am Beispiel der Milchviehhaltung , 2009 .

[3]  A. Prochnow,et al.  Water use indicators at farm scale: methodology and case study , 2012 .

[4]  Simone Kraatz.  Energy intensity in livestock operations – Modeling of dairy farming systems in Germany , 2012 .

[5]  T. Amede,et al.  Improving water productivity in mixed crop–livestock farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa , 2010 .

[6]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The green, blue and grey water footprint of farm animals and animal products , 2010 .

[7]  Manuele Margni,et al.  A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use in LCA , 2010 .

[8]  A. Chapagain,et al.  Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA: Part I—inventory modelling and characterisation factors for the main impact pathways , 2009 .

[9]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  T. Amede,et al.  Livestock water productivity in mixed crop-livestock farming systems of the Blue Nile basin: assessing variability and prospects for improvement. , 2009 .

[11]  T. Amede,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF THE LIVESTOCK-FEED AND WATER NEXUS ACROSS A MIXED CROP-LIVESTOCK SYSTEM'S INTENSIFICATION GRADIENT: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE INDO-GANGA BASIN , 2011, Experimental Agriculture.

[12]  Luis S. Pereira,et al.  Water and Agriculture:Facing Water Scarcity and Environmental Challenges , 2005 .

[13]  P. Q. Hung,et al.  Globalisation of water resources : international virtual water flows in relation to crop trade , 2005 .

[14]  J. Minx,et al.  A definition of “carbon footprint” , 2010 .

[15]  R. Lamming,et al.  Water Resources in Life-Cycle Impact Assessment : Considerations in Choosing Category Indicators , 2011 .

[16]  Chris Hendrickson,et al.  Direct and indirect water withdrawals for U.S. industrial sectors. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  A. Chapagain,et al.  Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA, part 2: case study of broccoli production in the UK and Spain , 2010 .

[18]  I. D. Boer,et al.  Assessing environmental impacts associated with freshwater consumption along the life cycle of animal products: the case of Dutch milk production in Noord-Brabant , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[19]  A. Koehler.  Water use in LCA: managing the planet’s freshwater resources , 2008 .