3D super-resolution microscopy performance and quantitative analysis assessment using DNA-PAINT and DNA origami test samples

Assessment of the imaging quality in localisation-based super-resolution techniques relies on an accurate characterisation of the imaging setup and analysis procedures. Test samples can provide regular feedback on system performance and facilitate the implementation of new methods. While multiple test samples for regular, 2D imaging are available, they are not common for more specialised imaging modes. Here, we analyse robust test samples for 3D and quantitative super-resolution imaging, which are straightforward to use, are time-and cost-effective and do not require experience beyond basic laboratory and imaging skills. We present two options for assessment of 3D imaging quality, the use of microspheres functionalised for DNA-PAINT and a commercial DNA origami sample. A method to establish and assess a qPAINT workflow for quantitative imaging is demonstrated with a second, commercially available DNA origami sample.

[1]  C. Soeller,et al.  Three-dimensional sub-100 nm super-resolution imaging of biological samples using a phase ramp in the objective pupil , 2011 .

[2]  David Baddeley,et al.  Visualization of Localization Microscopy Data , 2010, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[3]  M. Tokunaga,et al.  Highly inclined thin illumination enables clear single-molecule imaging in cells , 2008, Nature Methods.

[4]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[5]  Christoph Cremer,et al.  Super-resolution microscopy approaches to nuclear nanostructure imaging. , 2017, Methods.

[6]  R M Zucker,et al.  Practical confocal microscopy and the evaluation of system performance. , 1999, Methods.

[7]  P. Rothemund.  Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns , 2006, Nature.

[8]  W. Webb,et al.  Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[9]  Keng Imm Hng,et al.  ConfocalCheck - A Software Tool for the Automated Monitoring of Confocal Microscope Performance , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Maximilian T. Strauss,et al.  Super-resolution microscopy with DNA-PAINT , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[11]  F. Simmel,et al.  Single-molecule kinetics and super-resolution microscopy by fluorescence imaging of transient binding on DNA origami. , 2010, Nano letters.

[12]  Alexander H Clowsley,et al.  Versatile multiplexed super-resolution imaging of nanostructures by Quencher-Exchange-PAINT , 2018 .

[13]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[14]  Stefan W. Hell,et al.  Aberrations in confocal and multi-photon fluorescence microscopy induced by refractive index mismatch , 2006 .

[15]  W. C. Andrews,et al.  The American Institute of Electrical Engineers , 1923, Nature.

[16]  Hao Yan,et al.  Steric crowding and the kinetics of DNA hybridization within a DNA nanostructure system. , 2012, ACS nano.

[17]  David Baddeley,et al.  4D Super-Resolution Microscopy with Conventional Fluorophores and Single Wavelength Excitation in Optically Thick Cells and Tissues , 2011, PloS one.

[18]  Jon Geist,et al.  Subnanometer localization accuracy in widefield optical microscopy , 2018, Light, science & applications.

[19]  Johannes B. Woehrstein,et al.  Quantitative super-resolution imaging with qPAINT , 2016 .

[20]  S. Hess,et al.  Three-dimensional sub–100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples , 2008, Nature Methods.

[21]  Johannes B. Woehrstein,et al.  Multiplexed 3D Cellular Super-Resolution Imaging with DNA-PAINT and Exchange-PAINT , 2014, Nature Methods.

[22]  Harald Bosse,et al.  Using DNA origami nanorulers as traceable distance measurement standards and nanoscopic benchmark structures , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Alberto Diaspro,et al.  Evaluating image resolution in stimulated emission depletion microscopy , 2018 .

[24]  Martin Richardson,et al.  Beat the diffraction limit in 3D direct laser writing in photosensitive glass. , 2009, Optics express.

[25]  Isuru D. Jayasinghe,et al.  Optical single-channel resolution imaging of the ryanodine receptor distribution in rat cardiac myocytes , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Interferometric fluorescent super-resolution microscopy resolves 3D cellular ultrastructure , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Suliana Manley,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of software packages for single-molecule localization microscopy , 2015, Nature Methods.

[28]  Arie Shoshani,et al.  Optimizing connected component labeling algorithms , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[29]  Bo Huang,et al.  Active microscope stabilization in three dimensions using image correlation , 2013, Optical Nanoscopy.

[30]  Sandrine Lévêque-Fort,et al.  Aberration-accounting calibration for 3D single-molecule localization microscopy. , 2017, Optics letters.

[31]  R. Hochstrasser,et al.  Wide-field subdiffraction imaging by accumulated binding of diffusing probes , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Michael Unser,et al.  Super-resolution fight club: A broad assessment of 2D & 3D single-molecule localization microscopy software , 2018, bioRxiv.

[33]  S. Hess,et al.  Precisely and accurately localizing single emitters in fluorescence microscopy , 2014, Nature Methods.

[34]  Alexia Ferrand,et al.  Using the NoiSee workflow to measure signal-to-noise ratios of confocal microscopes , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Ian M. Dobbie,et al.  SIMcheck: a Toolbox for Successful Super-resolution Structured Illumination Microscopy , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[36]  David Baddeley,et al.  Algorithmic corrections for localization microscopy with sCMOS cameras - characterisation of a computationally efficient localization approach. , 2017, Optics express.

[37]  T. Wilson,et al.  Microscope calibration using laser written fluorescence , 2018, Optics express.

[38]  Michael A Thompson,et al.  Super-resolution imaging in live Caulobacter crescentus cells using photoswitchable EYFP , 2008, Nature Methods.

[39]  Glen L. Beane,et al.  Experimental characterization of 3D localization techniques for particle-tracking and super-resolution microscopy. , 2009, Optics express.

[40]  Felipe Opazo,et al.  Resolving bundled microtubules using anti-tubulin nanobodies , 2015, Nature Communications.

[41]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.

[42]  Mark Bates,et al.  Three-Dimensional Super-Resolution Imaging by Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy , 2008, Science.

[43]  L. Albertazzi,et al.  Nanoscale Mapping Functional Sites on Nanoparticles by Points Accumulation for Imaging in Nanoscale Topography (PAINT). , 2018, ACS nano.

[44]  S. Hell,et al.  Fluorescence nanoscopy in cell biology , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[45]  M. Heilemann,et al.  Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy in Eukaryotes. , 2017, Chemical reviews.

[46]  Isuru D. Jayasinghe,et al.  True Molecular Scale Visualization of Variable Clustering Properties of Ryanodine Receptors , 2018, Cell reports.

[47]  H. P. Kao,et al.  Tracking of single fluorescent particles in three dimensions: use of cylindrical optics to encode particle position. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[48]  Samuel J. Lord,et al.  Three-dimensional, single-molecule fluorescence imaging beyond the diffraction limit by using a double-helix point spread function , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Anna H. Klemm,et al.  Tracking Microscope Performance: A Workflow to Compare Point Spread Function Evaluations Over Time , 2019, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[50]  H. Brismar,et al.  Measuring true localization accuracy in super resolution microscopy with DNA-origami nanostructures , 2017 .

[51]  A. Small,et al.  Fluorophore localization algorithms for super-resolution microscopy , 2014, Nature Methods.

[52]  C.E. Shannon,et al.  Communication in the Presence of Noise , 1949, Proceedings of the IRE.

[53]  Philipp C Nickels,et al.  DNA origami nanopillars as standards for three-dimensional superresolution microscopy. , 2013, Nano letters.

[54]  D. Axelrod.  Cell-substrate contacts illuminated by total internal reflection fluorescence , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[55]  Isuru D. Jayasinghe,et al.  Combining confocal and single molecule localisation microscopy: A correlative approach to multi-scale tissue imaging. , 2015, Methods.

[56]  Fang Huang,et al.  Quantifying and Optimizing Single-Molecule Switching Nanoscopy at High Speeds , 2015, PloS one.

[57]  H. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Optimized localization-analysis for single-molecule tracking and super-resolution microscopy , 2010, Nature Methods.

[58]  Ralf Jungmann,et al.  DNA origami as a nanoscopic ruler for super-resolution microscopy. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[59]  Philip Tinnefeld,et al.  Fluorescence and super-resolution standards based on DNA origami , 2012, Nature Methods.

[60]  Maximilian T. Strauss,et al.  Nanometer-scale Multiplexed Super-Resolution Imaging with an Economic 3D-DNA-PAINT Microscope. , 2018, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[61]  David J. Williamson,et al.  Bayesian cluster identification in single-molecule localization microscopy data , 2015, Nature Methods.