Characterization of rock heterogeneity and numerical verification

On the basis of microstructure analysis and image analysis, rock heterogeneity is modelled by the rock and tool (R-T2D) interaction code according to homogenisation theory. The simulated results predict very well the non-linear stress–strain behaviour and the progressive fracture process of heterogeneous rock material. It is found that the weak parts and subsequent fractures before localization represent an obvious statistically uniform characteristic. Therefore, a statistical method is used to model rock heterogeneity. The results from the statistical modelling are in surprisingly good agreement with those from the homogenisation modelling. Considering the research scale, the rock heterogeneity is characterized better by the Weibull statistical method as a few characteristic parameters: the homogeneous index and the elemental seed parameters of the R-T2D finite element network. Finally, a series of numerical experiments are conducted to validate that the characterization of rock heterogeneity is reasonable and feasible, and that the R-T2D code is stable, repeatable and a valuable tool to research the fracture process of heterogeneous material.

[1]  Peter K. Kaiser,et al.  Numerical simulation of cumulative damage and seismic energy release during brittle rock failure-Part I: Fundamentals , 1998 .

[2]  M. Tabbara,et al.  RANDOM PARTICLE MODEL FOR FRACTURE OF AGGREGATE OR FIBER COMPOSITES , 1990 .

[3]  E. Sanchez-Palencia Non-Homogeneous Media and Vibration Theory , 1980 .

[4]  Z. T. Bieniawski,et al.  Suggested methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials: Part 1. Suggested method for determination of the uniaxial compressive strength of rock materials , 1979 .

[5]  Christian Huet,et al.  An integrated micromechanics and statistical continuum thermodynamics approach for studying the fracture behaviour of microcracked heterogeneous materials with delayed response , 1997 .

[6]  E. Garboczi,et al.  FRACTURE SIMULATIONS OF CONCRETE USING LATTICE MODELS : COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS , 1997 .

[7]  P. Meredith,et al.  Microcrack formation and material softening in rock measured by monitoring acoustic emissions , 1993 .

[8]  Leslie George Tham,et al.  Numerical studies of the influence of microstructure on rock failure in uniaxial compression — Part I: effect of heterogeneity , 2000 .

[9]  S. C. Blair,et al.  Analysis of compressive fracture in rock using statistical techniques: Part I. A non-linear rule-based model , 1998 .

[10]  Yong-Seok Seo,et al.  Micro- and macrobehavior of granitic rock: observations and viscoelastic homogenization analysis , 2001 .

[11]  Edward J. Garboczi,et al.  An algorithm for computing the effective linear elastic properties of heterogeneous materials: Three-dimensional results for composites with equal phase poisson ratios , 1995 .

[12]  B. N. Whittaker,et al.  Rock Fracture Mechanics: Principles, Design and Applications , 1992 .

[13]  Sahel N. Abduljauwad,et al.  Effects of confining pressure and temperature on mixed-mode (I–II) fracture toughness of a limestone rock , 2000 .

[14]  Alex Hansen,et al.  Fourier acceleration of iterative processes in disordered systems , 1988 .

[15]  D. Lockner,et al.  Quasi-static fault growth and shear fracture energy in granite , 1991, Nature.

[16]  Erik Schlangen,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of micromechanisms of fracture of cement-based composites , 1992 .

[17]  W. R. Wawersik,et al.  A study of brittle rock fracture in laboratory compression experiments , 1970 .

[18]  F. Vales,et al.  Determination of the fracture mechanical parameters of porous ceramics from microstructure parameters measured by quantitative image analysis , 1999 .

[19]  Soo-Ho Chang,et al.  Measurement of rock fracture toughness under modes I and II and mixed-mode conditions by using disc-type specimens , 2002 .

[20]  A. Juszczyk,et al.  Analysis of strength data using two- and three-parameter Weibull models , 1998 .

[21]  K. T. Chau,et al.  Microcracking and grain size effect in Yuen Long marbles , 1996 .

[22]  C. Tang,et al.  Numerical simulation of progressive rock failure and associated seismicity , 1997 .

[23]  Yong-Seok Seo,et al.  Microscopic observation and contact stress analysis of granite under compression , 2002 .

[24]  B. Stimpson,et al.  Effects of Grain Size on the Initiation and Propagation Thresholds of Stress-induced Brittle Fractures , 1999 .

[25]  Ian J. Davies,et al.  Empirical correction factor for the best estimate of Weibull modulus obtained using linear least squares analysis , 2001 .

[26]  Anthony R. Ingraffea,et al.  Mixed-Mode Fracture Initiation In Indiana Limestone And Westerly Granite , 1981 .

[27]  Shaoquan Kou,et al.  Numerical simulation of the fracture process in cutting heterogeneous brittle material , 2002 .

[28]  J. P. Harrison,et al.  Application of a local degradation model to the analysis of brittle fracture of laboratory scale rock specimens under triaxial conditions , 2002 .

[29]  Hongyuan Liu,et al.  Numerical simulation of the rock fragmentation process induced by indenters , 2002 .

[30]  W. Weibull A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[31]  W. Brekelmans,et al.  Overall behaviour of heterogeneous elastoviscoplastic materials: effect of microstructural modelling , 2000 .

[32]  S. Nemat-Nasser,et al.  Micromechanics: Overall Properties of Heterogeneous Materials , 1993 .

[33]  Hongyuan Liu,et al.  Numerical investigation of particle breakage as applied to mechanical crushing Part I: Single-particle breakage , 2001 .