Delivering complex engineering projects: Reexamining organizational control theory

Abstract The delivery performance of complex engineering projects, such as infrastructure projects, is poor and shows no sign of significant improvement. Most of these projects have been delivered by a contractor organization for a client—usually a public or statutory agency. To ensure expected outcomes, the client typically employs “control instruments”, such as specifying outputs, directing behaviors, selecting contractors and building relationships, to influence, or control, delivery by the contractors. The dominant literature informing the choice of control instruments is derived from organizational control theory, which primarily focuses on the exercise of control within a single organization and assumes that different types of control function independently. The persistent poor delivery performance of infrastructure projects suggests a need to revisit the recommendations of organizational control theory. While a number of papers have identified the potential of combining control instruments and the need to take into account the influence of operating in a client–contractor context the mechanics and influence of specific interactions remain little understood. A case study of the delivery of the Open Pool Australian Lightwater reactor (OPAL) Nuclear Research Reactor Project in Australia, documents how the various controls employed interacted and jointly impacted on the delivery outcome. The findings start the process of further developing control theory and offer a number of practical suggestions for combining control types for practitioners. There are two main contributions to theory by this study. First, it adds support to the view that the factors influencing the principal's choice of control modes are more complex than depicted by the control theory framework. Second, it enriches the emerging balance of control literature (Cardinal et al. 2004), suggesting that it is not only the number of control modes that determines performance but also the interactions between them. Thus not only is the appropriate choice of control modes based on more than task programmability and outcome measurability, it appears that interactions between control modes also play an important role. In the case studied a combination of input, output and clan control was seen as forming an effective combination. It was also assessed to be important to avoid behavior control due to the interaction effect between behavior control and output control when employing such a grouping.

[1]  K. Eisenhardt Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic , 1991 .

[2]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Portfolios of Control in Outsourced Software Development Projects , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Alternative Approaches for Studying Organizational Change , 2005 .

[4]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Contextual influences on self-control of is professionals engaged in systems development , 1996 .

[6]  William R. King,et al.  Predictors of Formal Control Usage in IT Outsourcing Partnerships , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Werner Rothengatter,et al.  Big Decisions, Big Risks: Improving Accountability in Mega Projects , 2002 .

[8]  Robert S. Dooley,et al.  After the Ink Dries: The Interaction of Trust and Control in US-Based International Joint Ventures , 2002 .

[9]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie? , 2002, 1303.6604.

[10]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Balancing and Rebalancing in the Creation and Evolution of Organizational Control , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[12]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches , 1985 .

[13]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  Controlling Information Systems Development Projects: The View from the Client , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[14]  D. Bryde,et al.  Client versus contractor perspectives on project success criteria , 2005 .

[15]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  And then came complex project management (revised) , 2009 .

[16]  William G. Ouchi,et al.  Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. , 1980 .

[17]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research , 2001 .

[18]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[19]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Information systems strategy and implementation: a case study of a building society , 1994, TOIS.

[20]  S. Snell Control Theory In Strategic Human Resource Management: The Mediating Effect Of Administrative Information , 1992 .

[21]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective , 1992 .

[22]  D. Mcgregor The Human Side of Enterprise , 1960 .

[23]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Three Controls are Better than One: A Computational Model of Complex Control Systems , 2002, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[24]  Chris Sauer,et al.  A Normative Theory of Organizational Control: Main and Interaction Effects of control Modes on Performance , 2010, ECIS.

[25]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Systems Development Ambidexterity: Explaining the Complementary and Substitutive Roles of Formal and Informal Controls , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  A. Tiwana,et al.  Does peripheral knowledge complement control? An empirical test in technology outsourcing alliances , 2007 .

[27]  R. Anthony,et al.  Management Controls in Industrial Research Organizations. , 1953 .

[28]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[29]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Investigating the Antecedents of Team-Based Clan Control: Adding Social Capital as a Predictor , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[30]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[31]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Control Combinations in Marketing: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence , 1993 .

[32]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  W. Ouchi A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms , 1979 .

[34]  E. Madden,et al.  Causal powers: A theory of natural necessity , 1975 .

[35]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures , 2002 .

[36]  Mona V. Makhija,et al.  The Role Of Organizational Controls In Managing Knowledge , 2006 .

[37]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Laura B. Cardinal Technological Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Use of Organizational Control in Managing Research and Development , 2001 .

[39]  W. Ouchi The Relationship Between Organizational Structure and Organizational Control. , 1977 .

[40]  B. Pentland Building Process Theory with Narrative: from Description to Explanation , 1999 .

[41]  Bernard J. Jaworski Toward a Theory of Marketing Control: Environmental Context, Control Types, and Consequences , 1988 .

[42]  L. Kirsch The Management of Complex Tasks in Organizations: Controlling the Systems Development Process , 1996 .