Cannibalism in the lifeboat — collective movement in Australian plague locusts

Mass migration of locusts is an economically devastating and poorly understood phenomenon. Locust mass migration often follows rapid population growth because individuals must move to find new sources of locally depleted resources. In Mormon crickets and Desert locusts, cannibalistic interactions have been revealed as the driving force behind collective mass movement. Locusts are known to compensate for nutrient deficiencies and they themselves are a good source of nutrients such as protein. However, direct empirical evidence for an adaptive benefit of cannibalism in migratory bands has been lacking. Here, we first show that Australian plague locusts, Chortoicetes terminifera, will cannibalise vulnerable conspecifics to compensate for protein deprivation, supporting the notion that cannibalistic interactions among nutritionally deprived individuals drives collective mass movement. We then show that individuals in a group with the opportunity to cannibalise survive longer and move more than individuals without the opportunity to cannibalise. These results provide empirical support for the ‘lifeboat mechanism’, which proposes that cannibalism offers the dual benefits to individuals in a group of surviving longer and travelling farther than a solitary individual without the opportunity to cannibalise.

[1]  Pawel Romanczuk,et al.  Nutritional state and collective motion: from individuals to mass migration , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[3]  M. Sunde,et al.  Potential Value of the Mormon Cricket (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) Harvested as a High-Protein Feed for Poultry , 1982 .

[4]  Gregory A. Sword,et al.  Radiotelemetry reveals differences in individual movement patterns between outbreak and non‐outbreak Mormon cricket populations , 2005 .

[5]  Bernard J. Crespi,et al.  Cannibalism : ecology and evolution among diverse taxa , 1992 .

[6]  Pawel Romanczuk,et al.  Collective motion due to individual escape and pursuit response. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[7]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  Collective Motion and Cannibalism in Locust Migratory Bands , 2008, Current Biology.

[8]  Stephen J. Simpson,et al.  Compensation by locusts for changes in dietary nutrients: behavioural mechanisms , 1985 .

[9]  E. Bernays The physiological control of drinking behaviour in nymphs of Locusta migratoria , 1977 .

[10]  K. W. Blayneh Cannibalism in a seasonal environment , 1999 .

[11]  I. Couzin,et al.  Cannibal crickets on a forced march for protein and salt. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Michel Lecoq,et al.  Phase polyphenism and preventative locust management. , 2010, Journal of insect physiology.

[13]  Carl Smith,et al.  Cannibalism: Ecology and evolution among diverse taxa , 1993, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[14]  G. Polis,et al.  The Evolution and Dynamics of Intraspecific Predation , 1981 .

[15]  Stephen J. Simpson,et al.  Group structure in locust migratory bands , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  Gregory A. Sword,et al.  Insect behaviour: Migratory bands give crickets protection , 2005, Nature.

[17]  A. D. de Roos,et al.  Population dynamic theory of size–dependent cannibalism , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.