A new photoelastic model for studying fatigue crack closure

The photoelastic analysis of crack tip stress intensity factors has been historically developed for use on sharp notches in brittle materials that idealize the cracked structure. This approach, while useful, is not applicable to cases where residual effects of fatigue crack development (e.g., plasticity, surface roughness) affect the applied stress intensity range. A photoelastic model of these fatigue processes has been developed using polycarbonate, which is sufficiently ductile to allow the growth of a fatigue crack. The resultant stress field has been modeled mathematically using the stress potential function approach of Muskhelishvili to predict the stresses near a loaded but closed crack in an elastic body. The model was fitted to full-field photoelastic data using a combination of a generic algorithm and the downhill simplex method. The technique offers a significant advance in the ability to characterize the behavior of fatigue cracks with plasticity-induced closure, and hence to gain new insights into the associated mechanisms.

[1]  John W. Hutchinson,et al.  Analysis of Closure in Fatigue Crack Growth , 1978 .

[2]  M. N. James,et al.  A study of fatigue crack closure in polycarbonate CT specimens , 2000 .

[3]  J. Srawley Wide range stress intensity factor expressions for ASTM E 399 standard fracture toughness specimens , 1976, International Journal of Fracture.

[4]  Eann A. Patterson,et al.  DETERMINATION OF PREDOMINANTLY MODE II STRESS INTENSITY FACTORS FROM ISOCHROMATIC DATA , 1993 .

[5]  J. Barnby The mechanics of fracture and fatigue , 1982 .

[6]  J. Donald Introducing the compliance ratio concept for determining effective stress intensity , 1997 .

[7]  J. Newman A crack-closure model for predicting fatigue crack growth under aircraft spectrum loading , 1981 .

[8]  R. J. Sanford,et al.  A general method for determining mixed-mode stress intensity factors from isochromatic fringe patterns , 1979 .

[9]  C. W. Smith,et al.  An assessment of factors influencing data obtained by the photoelastic stress freezing technique for stress fields near crack tips , 1972 .

[10]  M. Karpenko,et al.  Photoelastic validation of a theoretical solution for an edge cracked disk , 2003 .

[11]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[12]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[13]  J. Cañas,et al.  A complete field method for the photoelastic determination of KI and KII in general mixed-mode fracture , 1995 .

[14]  S. Suresh Fatigue of materials , 1991 .

[15]  M. N. James,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF CRACK CLOSURE AND THE EXTENT OF THE SHORT CRACK REGIME IN Q1N (HY80) STEEL , 1985 .

[16]  N. Muskhelishvili Some basic problems of the mathematical theory of elasticity , 1953 .

[17]  E. Wolf Fatigue crack closure under cyclic tension , 1970 .

[18]  Eann A. Patterson,et al.  A Photoelastic Determination of Stress Intensity Factors for Corner Cracks in a Bolted Joint , 1997 .