Rapid measurement of auditory filter shape in mice using the auditory brainstem response and notched noise

The notched noise method is an effective procedure for measuring frequency resolution and auditory filter shapes in both human and animal models of hearing. Briefly, auditory filter shape and bandwidth estimates are derived from masked thresholds for tones presented in noise containing widening spectral notches. As the spectral notch widens, increasingly less of the noise falls within the auditory filter and the tone becomes more detectible until the notch width exceeds the filter bandwidth. Behavioral procedures have been used for the derivation of notched noise auditory filter shapes in mice; however, the time and effort needed to train and test animals on these tasks renders a constraint on the widespread application of this testing method. As an alternative procedure, we combined relatively non-invasive auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements and the notched noise method to estimate auditory filters in normal-hearing mice at center frequencies of 8, 11.2, and 16 kHz. A complete set of simultaneous masked thresholds for a particular tone frequency were obtained in about an hour. ABR-derived filter bandwidths broadened with increasing frequency, consistent with previous studies. The ABR notched noise procedure provides a fast alternative to estimating frequency selectivity in mice that is well-suited to high through-put or time-sensitive screening.

[1]  W. Au,et al.  High-frequency auditory filter shape for the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  J. Zwislocki Theory of Temporal Auditory Summation , 1960 .

[3]  J. Wenstrup Auditory sensitivity in the fish-catching bat,Noctilio leporinus , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  J. McGee,et al.  The Influence of Thyroid Hormone Deficiency on the Development of Cochlear Nonlinearities , 2008, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[5]  Andrew J Oxenham,et al.  Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  B. May,et al.  Behavioral investigation of some possible effects of the central olivocochlear pathways in transgenic mice , 2002, Hearing Research.

[7]  S. Bacon,et al.  Psychophysical measures of auditory nonlinearities as a function of frequency in individuals with normal hearing. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Kenneth S. Henry,et al.  Habitat-related differences in the frequency selectivity of auditory filters in songbirds , 2010 .

[10]  Mario A Ruggero,et al.  Unexceptional sharpness of frequency tuning in the human cochlea. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in forward masking as a function of level. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter asymmetry in the hearing impaired. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  E. Borg,et al.  Hearing thresholds in the rabbit. A behavioral and electrophysiological study. , 1983, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[14]  Anna R. Chambers,et al.  Sound-Evoked Olivocochlear Activation in Unanesthetized Mice , 2012, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[15]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shape. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  T. Irino,et al.  Comparison of the roex and gammachirp filters as representations of the auditory filter. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  D. Stapells,et al.  Thresholds for Auditory Brain Stem Responses to Tones in Notched Noise from Infants and Young Children with Normal Hearing or Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[18]  R. Dooling,et al.  Nonsimultaneous auditory masking in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus). , 1985, Journal of comparative psychology.

[19]  Kenneth S. Henry,et al.  Auditory sensitivity and the frequency selectivity of auditory filters in the Carolina chickadee, Poecile carolinensis , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  M. Robb,et al.  Audibility and recognition of stop consonants in normal and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  J. Lucas,et al.  Sex differences in auditory filters of brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) , 2010, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[22]  B. Moore,et al.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  J. McGee,et al.  Development of cochlear amplification, frequency tuning, and two-tone suppression in the mouse. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  D L Weber,et al.  Growth of masking and the auditory filter. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  M. Liberman,et al.  Adding Insult to Injury: Cochlear Nerve Degeneration after “Temporary” Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  B. May,et al.  Auditory filter shapes of CBA/CaJ mice: behavioral assessments. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Micheal L. Dent,et al.  Behaviorally measured audiograms and gap detection thresholds in CBA/CaJ mice , 2009, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  M. J Penner,et al.  Neural or energy summation in a Poisson counting model , 1972 .

[30]  V. Popov,et al.  Frequency tuning of the dolphin's hearing as revealed by auditory brain-stem response with notch-noise masking. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  S Rosen,et al.  Auditory filter nonlinearity at 2 kHz in normal hearing listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  S Rosen,et al.  Auditory filter bandwidths as a function of level at low frequencies (125 Hz-1 kHz) , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Bradford J. May,et al.  Synaptic alterations at inner hair cells precede spiral ganglion cell loss in aging C57BL/6J mice , 2006, Hearing Research.

[34]  G. M. Klump,et al.  Absolute hearing thresholds and critical masking ratios in the European barn owl: a comparison with other owls , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[35]  D. Stapells,et al.  Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses to 1 kHz tones in noise-masked normally-hearing and sensorineurally hearing-impaired adults , 2005, International journal of audiology.

[36]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[37]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Amanda M. Lauer,et al.  GluA4 is indispensable for driving fast neurotransmission across a high‐fidelity central synapse , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  James J Finneran,et al.  Auditory filter shapes for the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the white whale (Delphinapterus leucas) derived with notched noise. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  R. Freyman,et al.  Effects of stimulus level on forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves in quiet and in noise. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  M. Brocaar,et al.  Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to clicks masked by notched noise. , 1984, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[42]  B. Moore,et al.  Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  V. Bruns Peripheral auditory tuning for fine frequency analysis by the CF-FM bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[44]  H. Schulze,et al.  Context Dependent Auditory Thresholds Determined by Brainstem Audiometry and Prepulse Inhibition in Mongolian Gerbils , 2012 .

[45]  Amanda M. Lauer,et al.  The Medial Olivocochlear System Attenuates the Developmental Impact of Early Noise Exposure , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[46]  D. Stapells,et al.  Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review. , 1997, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[47]  B. May,et al.  Relationship between the auditory brainstem response and auditory nerve thresholds in cats with hearing loss , 2001, Hearing Research.

[48]  J. Ison,et al.  Kcna1 Gene Deletion Lowers the Behavioral Sensitivity of Mice to Small Changes in Sound Location and Increases Asynchronous Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials But Does Not Affect Hearing Thresholds , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  E. Rubel,et al.  Hair cell regeneration in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): Recovery of pure-tone detection thresholds , 1993, Hearing Research.

[50]  Amanda M. Lauer,et al.  Analysis of environmental sound levels in modern rodent housing rooms , 2009, Lab Animal.

[51]  E. Friauf,et al.  Retrocochlear function of the peripheral deafness gene Cacna1d. , 2012, Human molecular genetics.

[52]  Skyler G. Jennings,et al.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  P. Joris,et al.  Frequency selectivity in Old-World monkeys corroborates sharp cochlear tuning in humans , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Nigel P. Cooper,et al.  Efferent‐mediated control of basilar membrane motion , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[55]  N. Suga,et al.  Peripheral auditory tuning for fine frequency analysis by the CF-FM bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[56]  D M Green,et al.  Psychophysical tuning curves independent of signal level. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.