Impact of aftershocks and uncertainties on the seismic evaluation of non-ductile reinforced concrete frame buildings

Abstract There is increasing interest in sophisticated seismic performance evaluation that encompasses the ability to incorporate aftershock hazard. This paper presents a methodology to examine the seismic performance of two non-ductile reinforced concrete frame buildings with consideration of the interaction between the aftershocks and various post-quake decisions. The assessment investigates the direct loss, downtime, fatalities, and total loss for each of the buildings. A total of 60 recorded mainshock–aftershocks sequences are utilized. The variations in results between the method with and without consideration of aftershocks are compared. The characteristics of mainshock–aftershock sequences which may be the cause of the difference are discussed and identified. Important uncertainty sources for the post-quake decisions are also investigated through a sensitivity study.

[1]  Mary C. Comerio,et al.  Estimating Downtime from Data on Residential Buildings after the Northridge and Loma Prieta Earthquakes , 2010 .

[2]  L. Lowes,et al.  Fragility Functions for Older Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints , 2006 .

[3]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Seismic Risk Assessment of Gravity Load Designed Reinforced Concrete Frames Subjected to Mid-America Ground Motions , 2009 .

[4]  Carlos Marcelo Ramirez Building-specific loss estimation methods & tools for simplified performance-based earthquake engineering , 2009 .

[5]  Judith Mitrani-Reiser,et al.  AN OUNCE OF PREVENTION: PROBABILISTIC LOSS ESTIMATION FOR PERFORMANCE - BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING , 2007 .

[6]  John B. Mander,et al.  Seismic Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures Designed Only for Gravity Loads - Part I: Design and Properties of a 1/3 Scale Model Structure , 1992 .

[7]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Accounting for Ground-Motion Spectral Shape Characteristics in Structural Collapse Assessment through an Adjustment for Epsilon , 2011 .

[8]  Laura O. Taylor,et al.  What Determines the Value of Life: A Meta‐Analysis , 2002 .

[9]  Eleni Smyrou,et al.  STRUCTURAL AND GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE CHRISTCHURCH (2011) AND DARFIELD (2010) EARTHQUAKES IN N.ZEALAND , 2011 .

[10]  Yue Li,et al.  Effect of Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences on Woodframe Building Damage Fragilities , 2015 .

[11]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure , 2006 .

[12]  Hitoshi Hirose,et al.  Spatial distribution and focal mechanisms of aftershocks of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake , 2011 .

[13]  John W. van de Lindt,et al.  Seismic risk of base isolated non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings considering uncertainties and mainshock–aftershock sequences , 2014 .

[14]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Assembly-Based Vulnerability of Buildings and Its Use in Performance Evaluation , 2001 .

[15]  H. Kao,et al.  The chi-Chi earthquake sequence: active, out-of-sequence thrust faulting in taiwan , 2000, Science.

[16]  C. Cornell,et al.  Building life-cycle cost analysis due to mainshock and aftershock occurrences , 2009 .

[17]  A Pomonis,et al.  Factors determining human casualty levels in earthquakes: Mortality prediction in building collapse. , 1992 .

[18]  Yue Li,et al.  Seismic Loss Estimation with Consideration of Aftershock Hazard and Post-Quake Decisions , 2016 .

[19]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[20]  Abbie B. Liel,et al.  Assessing the collapse risk of California's existing reinforced concrete frame structures: Metrics for seismic safety decisions , 2008 .

[21]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames – Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties , 2010 .

[22]  John L. Gross,et al.  Implications for Earthquake Risk Reduction in the United States From the Kocaeli, Turkey, Earthquake of August 17, 1999 | NIST , 2000 .

[23]  James L. Beck,et al.  Sensitivity of Building Loss Estimates to Major Uncertain Variables , 2002 .

[24]  Keith Porter Fragility of Hydraulic Elevators for Use in Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering , 2007 .

[25]  Lucile M. Jones,et al.  The 1994 Northridge earthquake sequence in California: Seismological and tectonic aspects , 1995 .

[26]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  Life-cycle seismic loss estimation and global sensitivity analysis based on stochastic ground motion modeling , 2013 .

[27]  Yue Li,et al.  Assessment of Damage Risks to Residential Buildings and Cost–Benefit of Mitigation Strategies Considering Hurricane and Earthquake Hazards , 2012 .

[28]  Mary C. Comerio,et al.  Estimating Downtime in Loss Modeling , 2006 .

[29]  M. Priestley,et al.  Ductility of Square-Confined Concrete Columns , 1982 .

[30]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Geotechnical and geological effects of the 21 September 1999 Chi‐Chi earthquake, Taiwan , 2000 .

[31]  Jorge Ruiz-García,et al.  Evaluation of drift demands in existing steel frames under as-recorded far-field and near-fault mainshock–aftershock seismic sequences , 2011 .

[32]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER , 2009 .

[33]  John W. van de Lindt,et al.  Assessment of Seismic Performance of Buildings with Incorporation of Aftershocks , 2015 .

[34]  Gregory G. Deierlein,et al.  Seismic Collapse Safety of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. II: Comparative Assessment of Nonductile and Ductile Moment Frames , 2011 .

[35]  Yue-Jun Yin,et al.  Loss Estimation of Light-Frame Wood Construction Subjected to Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences , 2011 .

[36]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Modeling Beam-Column Joints in Fragility Assessment of Gravity Load Designed Reinforced Concrete Frames , 2008 .