An Evolutionary Computation Approach to Scenario-Based Risk-Return Portfolio Optimization for General Risk Measures

Due to increasing complexity and non-convexity of financial engineering problems, biologically inspired heuristic algorithms gained significant importance especially in the area of financial decision optimization. In this paper, the stochastic scenario-based risk-return portfolio optimization problem is analyzed and solved with an evolutionary computation approach. The advantage of applying this approach is the creation of a common framework for an arbitrary set of loss distribution-based risk measures, regardless of their underlying structure. Numerical results for three of the most commonly used risk measures conclude the paper.

[1]  R. Rockafellar,et al.  Optimization of conditional value-at risk , 2000 .

[2]  Minqiang Li,et al.  A Genetic Algorithm for Solving Portfolio Optimization Problems with Transaction Costs and Minimum Transaction Lots , 2005, ICNC.

[3]  Stan Uryasev,et al.  Conditional value-at-risk: optimization algorithms and applications , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE/IAFE/INFORMS 2000 Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering (CIFEr) (Cat. No.00TH8520).

[4]  Christian Blum,et al.  Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison , 2003, CSUR.

[5]  Anthony Brabazon,et al.  Biologically inspired algorithms for financial modelling , 2006, Natural computing series.

[6]  Andreas Zell,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms and the Cardinality Constrained Portfolio Optimization Problem , 2004 .

[7]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Genetic and Evolutionary Computation – GECCO 2004 , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[8]  Dietmar Maringer Portfolio Management with Heuristic Optimization (Advances in Computational Management Science) , 2006 .

[9]  Dietmar Maringer,et al.  Portfolio management with heuristic optimization , 2005 .

[10]  Yew-Soon Ong,et al.  Advances in Natural Computation, First International Conference, ICNC 2005, Changsha, China, August 27-29, 2005, Proceedings, Part I , 2005, ICNC.

[11]  Piero P. Bonissone,et al.  Multiobjective financial portfolio design: a hybrid evolutionary approach , 2005, 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[12]  Andreas Zell,et al.  Evaluating a hybrid encoding and three crossover operators on the constrained portfolio selection problem , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8753).

[13]  Stephan Süss Alexander McNeil, Rüdiger Frey, Paul Embrechts (2005): “Quantitative Risk Management”, Princeton Series in Finance, $79.50.-. , 2006 .

[14]  Manfred Gilli,et al.  A Data-Driven Optimization Heuristic for Downside Risk Minimization , 2006 .

[15]  Philippe Artzner,et al.  Coherent Measures of Risk , 1999 .

[16]  Andreas Zell,et al.  Comparing Discrete and Continuous Genotypes on the Constrained Portfolio Selection Problem , 2004, GECCO.

[17]  María Auxilio Osorio Lama,et al.  Hybrid search for cardinality constrained portfolio optimization , 2006, GECCO '06.

[18]  P. Krokhmal,et al.  Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints , 2001 .

[19]  Detlef Seese,et al.  A Multi-objective Approach to Integrated Risk Management , 2005, EMO.

[20]  Michael O'Neill,et al.  Biologically Inspired Algorithms for Financial Modelling (Natural Computing Series) , 2005 .