Exceptions that prove the rule: Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies

A meta-analysis by J. T. Jost, J. Glaser, A. W. Kruglanski, and F. J. Sulloway (2003) concluded that political conservatism is partially motivated by the management of uncertainty and threat. In this reply to J. Greenberg and E. Jonas (2003), conceptual issues are clarified, numerous political anomalies are explained, and alleged counterexamples are incorporated with a dynamic model that takes into account differences between “young” and “old” movements. Studies directly pitting the rigidity-of-the-right hypothesis against the ideological extremity hypothesis demonstrate strong support for the former. Medium to large effect sizes describe relations between political conservatism and dogmatism and intolerance of ambiguity; lack of openness to experience; uncertainty avoidance; personal needs for order, structure, and closure; fear of death; and system threat.

[1]  Stuart A. Lilie,et al.  Liberalism and Conservatism: The Nature and Structure of Social Attitudes@@@Beyond Liberal and Conservative: Reassessing the Political Spectrum , 1985 .

[2]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Cognitive and Rhetorical Styles of Traditionalist and Reformist Soviet Politicians: A Content Analysis Study , 1989 .

[3]  W. D. Foland.  Reflections on the revolution in France , 1987 .

[4]  V. Ageyev,et al.  Authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union , 1992 .

[5]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Jim Sidanius,et al.  Cognitive functioning and sociopolitical ideology revisited , 1985 .

[7]  Meredith O'Brien,et al.  The prejudiced personality revisited: Personal need for structure and formation of erroneous group stereotypes. , 1995 .

[8]  J. Duckitt,et al.  A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice , 2001 .

[9]  M. Theunissen.  The other , 1984 .

[10]  Michael Gold.  Social Dimension , 2020, The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions.

[11]  W. F. Stone.  The Myth of Left-Wing Authoritarianism , 1980 .

[12]  N. Smelser,et al.  International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 2001 .

[13]  Nico Stehr,et al.  Conservatism : a contribution to the sociology of knowledge , 1987 .

[14]  A. Smithers,et al.  Dogmatism, social attitudes and personality. , 1978, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[15]  F. Pratto,et al.  Racism and Support of Free-Market Capitalism: A Cross-Cultural Analysis , 1993 .

[16]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[17]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Stability and change in the complexity of senatorial debate: Testing the cognitive versus rhetorical style hypotheses. , 1984 .

[18]  Dwight R. Lee,et al.  Hard heads, soft hearts : tough-minded economics for a just society , 1988 .

[19]  R. Christie.  CHAPTER 10 – Authoritarianism and Related Constructs , 1991 .

[20]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[21]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. , 1984 .

[22]  B. Altemeyer,et al.  The Other “Authoritarian Personality” , 1998 .

[23]  M. Billig.  The social dimension: Political ideology: social psychological aspects , 1984 .

[24]  A. Chirumbolo.  The relationship between need for cognitive closure and political orientation: The mediating role of authoritarianism. , 2002 .

[25]  A. Inkeles,et al.  International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. , 1968 .

[26]  The Authoritarian Personality and the Organization of Attitudes , 2004 .

[27]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[28]  A. Blinder,et al.  Hard Heads, Soft Hearts: Tough-Minded Economics for a Just Society , 1988 .

[29]  R. Littman,et al.  Psychology as Politics. , 1986 .

[30]  Edwin N. Barker,et al.  Authoritarianism of the Political Right, Center, and Left , 1963 .

[31]  P. Tetlock.  Cognitive style and political ideology. , 1983 .

[32]  J. Gallant,et al.  Supreme Court decision making: Cognitive style as a predictor of ideological consistency of voting. , 1985 .

[33]  Dennis Chong,et al.  Similarities and Differences Between Left-Wing and Right-Wing Radicals , 1985, British Journal of Political Science.

[34]  Glenn D. Wilson,et al.  The Psychology of conservatism , 1973 .

[35]  Terri Gullickson,et al.  Encyclopedia of human behavior , 1995 .

[36]  J. Jost,et al.  The Estrangement of Social Constructionism and Experimental Social Psychology: History of the Rift and Prospects for Reconciliation , 2002 .

[37]  W. Ressler,et al.  Intolerance of Ambiguity and Political Orientation among Israeli University Students. , 1998 .

[38]  J. Sidanius.  Intolerance of ambiguity and socio-politico ideology: A multidimensional analysis , 1978 .

[39]  P. Kohn.  Authoritarianism, rebelliousness, and their correlates among British undergraduates. , 1974, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[40]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  When similarity breeds content: need for closure and the allure of homogeneous and self-resembling groups. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  T. Adorno.  The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[42]  S. Huntington.  Conservatism as an Ideology , 1957, American Political Science Review.

[43]  Markus Kemmelmeier.  Need for Closure and Political Orientation Among German University Students , 1997 .

[44]  Studies in the scope and method of "The authoritarian personality." , 1954 .

[45]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  The Open and Closed Mind , 1961 .

[46]  Jerry Z. Muller.  Conservatism: Historical Aspects , 2001 .

[47]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Psychological motives and political orientation--the left, the right, and the rigid: comment on Jost et al. (2003). , 2003, Psychological bulletin.