Quantitative Risk Assessment of Biogas Plant – Determination of Assumptions and Estimation of Selected Top Event

Biogas plants are a specific facility from the QRA (Quantitative Risk Assessment) methodologies' point of view, especially in the case of the determination of the event frequency of accident scenarios for biogas leakage from a gas holder and subsequent initiation. QRA methodologies determine event frequencies for different types of accident events related to vessels made of steel. Gas holders installed at biogas plants are predominantly made of other materials and are often integrated with the fermenter. It is therefore a specific type of gas holder, differing from that which is commonly used in the chemical industry. In addition, long-term experience is not available for the operation of biogas plants, unlike in the chemical industry. The event frequencies listed in the QRA methodologies are not relevant for the risk assessment of biogas plants. This work is focused on setting the prerequisites for QRA of biogas storage, including for example: information on hazardous chemical substances occurring at biogas plants, their classification, and information on the construction of integrated gas holders. For the purpose of the work, a scenario was applied where the greatest damage (to life or property) is expected. This scenario is the leakage of the total volume of hazardous gas substance from the gas holder and subsequent initiation. Based on this information, a "tree" was processed for "Fault Tree Analysis" (FTA), and frequencies were estimated for each event. Thereafter, an "Event Tree Analysis" was carried out. This work follows up on a discussion by experts on the determination of scenario frequencies for biogas plants that was conducted in the past.

[1]  Philip Wexler,et al.  Encyclopedia of Toxicology , 1998 .

[2]  James W. Johnson,et al.  The US NRC's accident sequence precursor program: an overview and development of a Bayesian approach to estimate core damage frequency using precursor information , 1996 .

[3]  Luboš Kotek,et al.  Quantitative analyses of biogas plant accidents in Europe , 2018, Renewable Energy.

[4]  J. K. Vrijling,et al.  Criteria for Acceptable Risk in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[5]  Hans J. Pasman History of Dutch process equipment failure frequencies and the Purple Book , 2011 .

[6]  L. C. Cadwallader,et al.  Reliability estimates for selected sensors in fusion applications , 1996 .

[7]  Nathan Siu,et al.  Bayesian parameter estimation in probabilistic risk assessment , 1998 .

[8]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Analysis of accidents in biogas production and upgrading , 2016 .

[9]  Laura J Steinberg,et al.  Empirical Estimation of the Conditional Probability of Natech Events Within the United States , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  S. Mahesh,et al.  Hazard Classification of Biogas and Risks of Large Scale Biogas Production , 2013 .

[11]  C. Kirchsteiger Impact of accident precursors on risk estimates from accident databases , 1997 .

[12]  Xiang-bo Li,et al.  Service Lifetime Estimation of EPDM Rubber Based on Accelerated Aging Tests , 2017, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

[13]  Hyun Sung Park,et al.  Useful lifetime prediction of rubber component , 2011 .

[14]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Precursor-based hierarchical Bayesian approach for rare event frequency estimation: A case of oil spill accidents , 2013 .

[15]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..