Multilayer Brokerage in Geo-Social Networks

Open network structures and brokerage positions have long been seen as playing a crucial role in sustaining social capital and competitive advantage. The degree to which individuals intermediate between otherwise disconnected others can differ across online and offline social networks. For example, users may broker online between two others who then exchange offline the information received through social media. Yet network studies of social capital have often neglected the interplay between online and offline interactions, and have concentrated primarily on a single layer. Here, we propose a geo-social multilayer approach to brokerage that casts light on the integrated online and offline foundations of social capital. Drawing on a data set of 37,722 Foursquare users in London, we extend the notion of brokerage by examining users’ positions in an online social network and their offline mobility patterns through checkins. We find that social and geographic brokerage positions are distinct and asymmetric across the social and co-location networks. On the one hand, users may appear to be brokers online when in fact their ability to intermediate would be mitigated if their offline positions were also taken into account. On the other, users who appear to have little brokerage power offline may be active brokers within networks that combine both online and offline interactions.

[1]  Vito Latora,et al.  Social Cohesion, Structural Holes, and a Tale of Two Measures , 2012, ArXiv.

[2]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Bridging the gap between physical location and online social networks , 2010, UbiComp.

[3]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Using facebook after losing a job: differential benefits of strong and weak ties , 2013, CSCW.

[4]  N. Eagle,et al.  Network Diversity and Economic Development , 2010, Science.

[5]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[6]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[7]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Cultivating Social Resources on Social Network Sites: Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Their Role in Social Capital Processes , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Large-scale topological and dynamical properties of the Internet. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Multilayer networks , 2013, J. Complex Networks.

[10]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Keep Your Friends Close and Your Facebook Friends Closer: A Multiplex Network Approach to the Analysis of Offline and Online Social Ties , 2014, ICWSM.

[11]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[12]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices , 2011, New Media Soc..

[13]  Jie Tang,et al.  Mining structural hole spanners through information diffusion in social networks , 2013, WWW.

[14]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Users and nonusers: interactions between levels of adoption and social capital , 2013, CSCW '13.

[15]  Harrison C. White Chains of Opportunity , 2014 .

[16]  E. Barozet,et al.  Social Capital. A Theory of Social Structure and Action , 2002 .

[17]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? , 2001 .

[18]  Michael Szell,et al.  Multirelational organization of large-scale social networks in an online world , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Patricia E. Tweet Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2006 .

[20]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[21]  K. Cook,et al.  Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks , 1978 .

[22]  N. Lin Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action , 2001 .

[23]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization , 2009, C&T.

[24]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[26]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Hierarchical organization in complex networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Steven Durlauf,et al.  Social Capital , 2004 .

[28]  Massimiliano Zanin,et al.  Modeling the multi-layer nature of the European Air Transport Network: Resilience and passengers re-scheduling under random failures , 2012, ArXiv.

[29]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  The Ties That Bond: Re-Examining the Relationship between Facebook Use and Bonding Social Capital , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.