Experimental production of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis: comparison of serological and immunological responses using pili fractions of Moraxella bovis.

The effect of vaccinating cattle and mice on the development of keratoconjunctivitis was studied. Cattle were vaccinated with whole cells, disrupted cells and pili fractions of three strains of Moraxella bovis. Mice were vaccinated with pili fractions of three strains. The resistance of all vaccinated animals was challenged with virulent cultures of M. bovis. In an attempt to correlate the response seen after vaccination and challenge with a pili fraction of M. bovis, vaccinated cattle and mice were grouped on the basis of signs of disease manifested and compared on the basis of serological responses. Serum samples were tested for antibodies by a gel diffusion precipitin test. A greater number of the sera of resistant cattle had antibodies to the homologous pili antigen than those of vaccinated nonresistant cattle. Cattle vaccinated with disrupted cells were not resistant to infectious bovine kerato-conjuctivitis and their sera lacked antibodies against the pili antigens. Vaccinated mice were more resistant to infectious bovine kerato-conjuctivitis and their sera lacked antibodies against the pili antigens. Vaccinated mice were more resistant to challenge exposure by homologous than heterologous cultures. A greater number of the sera of resistant mice had antibodies to pili antigens than nonresistant mice.

[1]  G. W. Pugh,et al.  Experimentally induced infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis: relationship of vaccination schedule to protection against exposure with homologous Moraxella bovis culture. , 1975, American journal of veterinary research.

[2]  F. H. White,et al.  Association of pili with rough colony type of Moraxella bovis. , 1974, American journal of veterinary research.

[3]  G. W. Pugh,et al.  The pathophysiological effects of Moraxella bovis toxins on cattle, mice and guinea pigs. , 1973, Canadian journal of comparative medicine : Revue canadienne de medecine comparee.

[4]  K. Bøvre,et al.  Variation of colony morphology reflecting fimbriation in Moraxella bovis and two reference strains of M. nonliquefaciens. , 2009, Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica. Section B: Microbiology and immunology.

[5]  K. Bøvre,et al.  Fimbriation and colony type of Moraxella bovis in relation to conjunctival colonization and development of keratoconjunctivitis in cattle. , 2009, Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica. Section B: Microbiology and immunology.

[6]  G. W. Pugh,et al.  Experimentally induced infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis: vaccination with nonviable Moraxella bovis culture. , 1972, American journal of veterinary research.

[7]  H. De,et al.  Experimentally induced bovine infectious keratoconjunctivitis: effectiveness of intramuscular vaccination with viable Moraxella bovis culture. , 1971 .

[8]  T. J. Mcdonald,et al.  Bovine infectious keratoconjunctivitis: serological aspects of Moraxella bovis infection. , 1971, Canadian journal of comparative medicine : Revue canadienne de medecine comparee.

[9]  G. W. Pugh,et al.  Comparison of the virulence of various strains of Moraxella bovis. , 1970, Canadian journal of comparative medicine : Revue canadienne de medecine comparee.

[10]  G. W. Pugh,et al.  Experimental bovine infectious keratoconjunctivitis caused by sunlamp irradiation and Moraxella bovis infection: correlation of hamolytic ability and pathogenicity. , 1968, American journal of veterinary research.

[11]  T. J. Mcdonald,et al.  The isolation and characterization of Moraxella bovis. , 1966, American journal of veterinary research.

[12]  R. D. Barner A study of Moraxella bovis and its relation to bovine keratitis. , 1952, American journal of veterinary research.