Mechanical invariants are implicated in dynamic touch as a function of their salience in the stimulus flow.

The authors investigated the mechanical basis of length perception through dynamic touch using specially designed rods in which the various moments of mass distribution (mass, static moment, and rotational inertia) were varied independently. In a series of 4 experiments, exploration style and rod orientation were manipulated such that the relative salience of moments of mass distribution varied markedly. Results showed that perceived length was based on the most salient moments. The authors concluded that the notion of salience is crucial for understanding the implication of moments of mass distribution in length perception and that it should play a pivotal role in developing an encompassing theory of dynamic touch.

[1]  M. Turvey.  Dynamic touch. , 1996, The American psychologist.

[2]  S. Runeson.  On the possibility of "smart" perceptual mechanisms. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[3]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Perceiving the Lengths of Rods That are Held But Not Wielded , 1990 .

[4]  M. Turvey,et al.  Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the “muscular sense” , 1994, Neuroscience.

[6]  Peter J Beek,et al.  Which mechanical invariants are associated with the perception of length and heaviness of a nonvisible handheld rod? Testing the inertia tensor hypothesis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  M T Turvey,et al.  Attunement, Calibration, and Exploration in Fast Haptic Perceptual Learning , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  Further Evidence of Perceptual Independence (Specificity) in Dynamic Touch , 1999 .

[9]  Claudia Carello,et al.  Inertial eigenvalues, rod density, and rod diameter in length perception by dynamic touch , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  C Carello,et al.  Selective perception by dynamic touch , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[12]  C. Michaels,et al.  Higher order and lower order variables in the visual perception of relative pulling force. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  M. Goldberg,et al.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[14]  M T Turvey,et al.  Perceiving the Sweet Spot , 1999, Perception.

[15]  I. Kingma,et al.  The Inertia Tensor Versus Static Moment and Mass in Perceiving Length and Heaviness of Hand-Wielded Rods , 2002 .

[16]  M. T. Turveyt.  The Challenge of a Physical Account of Action: A Personal View* , 1987 .

[17]  A. Remole.  PERCEPTION WITH AN EYE FOR MOTION , 1987 .

[18]  M T Turvey,et al.  Inertia tensor and weight-percept models of length perception by static holding. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  S. R. Ganeshan,et al.  Effortful touch with minimum movement: revisited. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  M T Turvey,et al.  Tensorial basis to the constancy of perceived object extent over variations of dynamic touch , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Effortful touch with minimal movement , 1992 .

[22]  M T Turvey,et al.  Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  D. M. Jacobs,et al.  Learning to perceive the relative mass of colliding balls: The effects of ratio scaling and feedback , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  E.,et al.  Four Ways to Reject Directed Perception , 2002 .

[25]  M. Turvey,et al.  Exteroception and exproprioception by dynamic touch are different functions of the inertia tensor , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Gravitational and Muscular Variables in Perceiving Rod Extent by Wielding , 1989 .

[27]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Perceiving extents of rods by wielding: haptic diagonalization and decomposition of the inertia tensor. , 1989 .

[28]  A. Noē.  Direct Perception , 2022 .

[29]  S. Treue.  Visual attention: the where, what, how and why of saliency , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  M T Turvey,et al.  Perceiving the width and height of a hand-held object by dynamic touch. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Rob Withagen,et al.  The role of feedback information for calibration and attunement in perceiving length by dynamic touch. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  M T Turvey,et al.  Perceptual independence of whole length, partial length, and hand position in wielding a rod. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.