The pros and cons of Microsoft Academic Search from a bibliometric perspective
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Erhard Rahm,et al. Comparing the scientific impact of conference and journal publications in computer science , 2008, Inf. Serv. Use.
[2] Péter Jacsó,et al. Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..
[3] Dah-Ming Chiu,et al. "Publish or Perish" in the Internet Age: a study of publication statistics in computer networking research , 2010, CCRV.
[4] C. Lee Giles,et al. Digital Libraries and Autonomous Citation Indexing , 1999, Computer.
[5] Péter Jacsó,et al. Dubious hit counts and cuckoo's eggs , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..
[6] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. Proceedings literature as additional data source for bibliometric analysis , 2006, Scientometrics.
[7] Declan Butler,et al. Computing giants launch free science metrics , 2011, Nature.
[8] Wang-Chien Lee,et al. CiteSeerx: an architecture and web service design for an academic document search engine , 2006, WWW '06.
[9] Judit Bar-Ilan,et al. Web of Science with the Conference Proceedings Citation Indexes: the case of computer science , 2010, Scientometrics.
[10] C. Lee Giles,et al. CiteSeer: an automatic citation indexing system , 1998, DL '98.
[11] Scott Carlson,et al. Challenging Google, Microsoft Unveils a Search Tool for Scholarly Articles. , 2006 .
[12] Wei-Ying Ma,et al. Object-level Vertical Search , 2007, CIDR.