The influence of the Stiles–Crawford peak location on visual performance

We investigated the influence of the Stiles-Crawford peak location on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and phase transfer with 6 mm diameter pupils in two subjects. Apodising filters were used to move the peak. One subject (SM) had her natural peak 0.9 mm below pupil centre, and visual performance was measured for both this peak position and when the peak was moved to the same distance above pupil centre. The other subject (DAA) had a more centred peak and visual performance was measured for this peak position and when the peak was moved both 2.3 mm temporally and 2.6 mm nasally. Measurements of contrast sensitivity and phase transfer were compared with predictions based on aberration measurements. The peak position had definite influence on performance, but this was mainly noticeable when subjects were defocused e.g. SM's visual acuity was reduced by 0.13 log units under the peak-shifted condition at -2D (hypermetropic) defocus.

[1]  W. Stiles,et al.  Luminous Efficiency of Rays entering the Eye Pupil at Different Points , 1937, Nature.

[2]  A displaced Stiles-Crawford effect associated with an eccentric pupil. , 1978, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  J M Enoch,et al.  MARKED ACCOMMODATION, RETINAL STRETCH, MONOCULAR SPACE PERCEPTION AND RETINAL RECEPTOR ORIENTATION * , 1975, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[4]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Influence of Stiles-Crawford apodization on visual acuity. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical Modulation Transfer and Contrast Sensitivity with Decentered Small Pupils in the Human Eye , 1996, Vision Research.

[6]  M. Mcmahon,et al.  Retinal contrast losses and visual resolution with obliquely incident light. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  A Bradley,et al.  Apodization by the Stiles-Crawford effect moderates the visual impact of retinal image defocus. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  Dion H Scott,et al.  Monochromatic aberrations of human eyes in the horizontal visual field. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  M. Mino,et al.  Improvement in the OTF of a Defocused Optical System Through the Use of Shaded Apertures. , 1971, Applied optics.

[10]  R A Applegate,et al.  Parametric representation of Stiles-Crawford functions: normal variation of peak location and directionality. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  R Navarro,et al.  Monochromatic aberrations and point-spread functions of the human eye across the visual field. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  C. Dunnewold.  A RETINAL ACUITY DIRECTION EFFECT. , 1963, Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde.

[13]  D A Atchison,et al.  Predicting the effects of optical defocus on human contrast sensitivity. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  R A Applegate,et al.  Induced movement of receptor alignment toward a new pupillary aperture. , 1981, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  S A Burns,et al.  Comparison of cone directionality determined by psychophysical and reflectometric techniques. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  G WESTHEIMER,et al.  Retinal light distribution for circular apertures in Maxwellian view. , 1959, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[17]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[18]  Stephen A. Burns,et al.  Evaluating the role of cone directionality in image formation , 2000 .

[19]  D. G. Green,et al.  Visual resolution when light enters the eye through different parts of the pupil , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  D. Atchison,et al.  The Stiles–Crawford effect and subjective measurement of aberrations , 2002, Vision Research.

[21]  Light capture by human cones. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  Susana Marcos,et al.  On the symmetry between eyes of wavefront aberration and cone directionality , 2000, Vision Research.

[23]  L. McLoon,et al.  Doxorubicin chemomyectomy is enhanced when performed two days following bupivacaine injections: the effect coincides with the peak of muscle satellite cell division. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  D A Atchison,et al.  Effects of defocus and pupil size on human contrast sensitivity , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[25]  H. Smallman,et al.  Vision: Realignment of cones after cataract removal , 2001, Nature.

[26]  Dion H Scott,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and the Stiles–Crawford effect , 2002, Vision Research.

[27]  D A Atchison,et al.  Description of a method for neutralising the Stiles–Crawford effect , 2001, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[28]  P. Artal,et al.  The Influence of the Stiles-Crawford Effect on Visual Acuity , 2001 .

[29]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Ocular aberrations with ray tracing and Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensors: does polarization play a role? , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[30]  D. Crewther.  The role of photoreceptors in the control of refractive state , 2000, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.