Resilience in Everyday Operations

Managing complexity and uncertainty in high-risk sociotechnical systems requires people to continuously adapt. Designing resilient systems that support adaptive behavior requires a deepened understanding of the context in which adaptations take place, of conditions and enablers to implement these adaptations, and of their effects on the overall system. Also, it requires a focus on how people actually perform, not how they are presumed to perform according to textbook situations. In this paper, a framework to analyze adaptive behavior in everyday situations in which systems are working near the margins of safety is presented. Further, the variety space diagram has been developed as a means to illustrate how system variability, disturbances, and constraints affect work performance. The examples that underlie the framework and the diagram are derived from nine focus groups with representatives working with safety-related issues in different work domains, including health care, nuclear power, transportation, and emergency services.

[1]  Giuseppe Mancini,et al.  Intelligent Decision Support in Process Environments , 1986, NATO ASI Series.

[2]  Philip Koopman,et al.  Work-arounds, Make-work, and Kludges , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[3]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  The Four Cornerstones of Resilience Engineering , 2016 .

[4]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Resilience Engineering in Practice: A Guidebook , 2012 .

[5]  Tom Kontogiannis,et al.  User strategies in recovering from errors in man–machine systems , 1999 .

[6]  Ann Blandford,et al.  A resilience markers framework for small teams , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  B. Fischoff Hindsight (Not Equal To) Foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment Under Uncertainty. , 1975 .

[8]  J. Rassmusen,et al.  Information Processing and Human - Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .

[9]  Robert R. Hoffman,et al.  Beyond Simon's Slice: Five Fundamental Trade-Offs that Bound the Performance of Macrocognitive Work Systems , 2011, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[10]  D. Morgan Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[11]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Unwritten Rules For Safety And Performance In An Oncology Day Care Unit: Testing The Resilience Markers Framework , 2011 .

[12]  John M. Flach,et al.  Control Theory for Humans: Quantitative Approaches To Modeling Performance , 2002 .

[13]  David D. Woods,et al.  The price of flexibility , 1993, IUI '93.

[14]  Catherine M. Burns,et al.  There Is More to Monitoring a Nuclear Power Plant than Meets the Eye , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Robert L. Wears,et al.  Colliding Dilemmas: Interactions Of Locally Adaptive Strategies In A Hospital Setting , 2011 .

[16]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005 .

[17]  Carl Rollenhagen,et al.  Event investigations at nuclear power plants in Sweden: Reflections about a method and some associated practices , 2011 .

[18]  David D. Woods John Wreathall STRESS-STRAIN PLOTS AS A BASIS FOR ASSESSING SYSTEM RESILIENCE , 2016 .

[19]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[20]  Christopher Nemeth,et al.  Remaining sensitive to the possibility of failure , 2008 .

[21]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  Anticipating the effects of technological change: A new era of dynamics for human factors , 2000 .

[22]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2005 .

[23]  E. Hollnagel,et al.  What-You-Look-For-Is-What-You-Find - The consequences of underlying accident models in eight accident investigation manuals , 2009 .

[24]  B. Brehmer Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems. , 1992, Acta psychologica.

[25]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  Drift into Failure: From Hunting Broken Components to Understanding Complex Systems , 2011 .

[26]  Emily S. Patterson,et al.  Collaborative cross-checking to enhance resilience , 2005, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[27]  E. Hollnagel The Etto Principle: Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off: Why Things That Go Right Sometimes Go Wrong , 2009 .

[28]  G. McCarthy FRAM: the functional resonance analysis method, modelling complex socio-technical systems , 2013 .

[29]  E. Hollnagel FRAM: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method: Modelling Complex Socio-technical Systems , 2012 .

[30]  David D. Woods,et al.  Price of flexibility in intelligent interfaces , 1993, Knowl. Based Syst..

[31]  Sophia Antipolis,et al.  L'ÉCOLE NATIONALE SUPÉRIEURE DES MINES DE PARIS , 2007 .

[32]  David D Woods,et al.  Steering the Reverberations of Technology Change on Fields of Practice: Laws that Govern Cognitive Work , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[33]  Tom Kontogiannis,et al.  A contemporary view of organizational safety: variability and interactions of organizational processes , 2010, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[34]  Sidney W A Dekker,et al.  Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on error and performance. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[35]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Hindsight ≠ foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty* , 2003 .

[36]  Robert L. Wears,et al.  Exploring the Dynamics of Resilient Performance , 2011 .

[37]  N B Sarter,et al.  LEARNING FROM AUTOMATION SURPRISES AND "GOING SOUR" ACCIDENTS. IN: COGNITIVE ENGINEERING IN THE AVIATION DOMAIN , 2000 .

[38]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Barriers And Accident Prevention , 2004 .

[39]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[40]  José Orlando Gomes,et al.  Handoff strategies in settings with high consequences for failure: lessons for health care operations. , 2004, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[41]  E Hollnagel Cognitive system performance analysis , 1986 .

[42]  J. E. Groves,et al.  Made in America: Science, Technology and American Modernist Poets , 1989 .

[43]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  ANALYSIS OF PILOTS' MONITORING AND PERFORMANCE ON AN AUTOMATED FLIGHT DECK , 2001 .

[44]  George W. Furnas,et al.  Making sense of sensemaking , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[45]  M. Weggeman Sensemaking in organisations , 1996 .

[46]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. , 1975 .

[47]  Robert L. Wears,et al.  Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[48]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  Ten Questions About Human Error : A New View of Human Factors and System Safety , 2004 .

[49]  C. Boddy A rose by any other name may smell as sweet but “group discussion” is not another name for a “focus group” nor should it be , 2005 .

[50]  Snorre Sklet,et al.  Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[51]  Richard I. Cook,et al.  Regularly irregular: how groups reconcile cross-cutting agendas and demand in healthcare , 2007, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[52]  Richard I. Cook,et al.  SPECIAL SECTION: Adapting to New Technology in the Operating Room , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[53]  David D. Woods,et al.  Hollnagel’s test: being ‘in control’ of highly interdependent multi-layered networked systems , 2010, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[54]  S. Dekker,et al.  The complexity of failure: Implications of complexity theory for safety investigations , 2011 .

[55]  D. Woods,et al.  Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[56]  R. Cook,et al.  “Going solid”: a model of system dynamics and consequences for patient safety , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[57]  F. Guldenmund The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research , 2000 .

[58]  Gary Klein,et al.  Making Sense of Sensemaking 1: Alternative Perspectives , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[59]  Jonas Lundberg,et al.  Strategies for dealing with resistance to recommendations from accident investigations. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[60]  Viktor Mikhaĭlovich Glushkov,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957, The Mathematical Gazette.

[61]  D. Woods,et al.  Behind Human Error , 2010 .

[62]  Christopher Nemeth,et al.  Preparation and restoration , 2009 .

[63]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .