Resilience in Everyday Operations
暂无分享,去创建一个
Rogier Woltjer | Jonas Lundberg | Amy Rankin | Erik Hollnagel | Carl Rollenhagen | E. Hollnagel | Jonas Lundberg | C. Rollenhagen | Rogier Woltjer | Amy Rankin
[1] Giuseppe Mancini,et al. Intelligent Decision Support in Process Environments , 1986, NATO ASI Series.
[2] Philip Koopman,et al. Work-arounds, Make-work, and Kludges , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..
[3] Erik Hollnagel,et al. The Four Cornerstones of Resilience Engineering , 2016 .
[4] Erik Hollnagel,et al. Resilience Engineering in Practice: A Guidebook , 2012 .
[5] Tom Kontogiannis,et al. User strategies in recovering from errors in man–machine systems , 1999 .
[6] Ann Blandford,et al. A resilience markers framework for small teams , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..
[7] B. Fischoff. Hindsight (Not Equal To) Foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment Under Uncertainty. , 1975 .
[8] J. Rassmusen,et al. Information Processing and Human - Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .
[9] Robert R. Hoffman,et al. Beyond Simon's Slice: Five Fundamental Trade-Offs that Bound the Performance of Macrocognitive Work Systems , 2011, IEEE Intelligent Systems.
[10] D. Morgan. Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.
[11] Ann Blandford,et al. Unwritten Rules For Safety And Performance In An Oncology Day Care Unit: Testing The Resilience Markers Framework , 2011 .
[12] John M. Flach,et al. Control Theory for Humans: Quantitative Approaches To Modeling Performance , 2002 .
[13] David D. Woods,et al. The price of flexibility , 1993, IUI '93.
[14] Catherine M. Burns,et al. There Is More to Monitoring a Nuclear Power Plant than Meets the Eye , 2000, Hum. Factors.
[15] Robert L. Wears,et al. Colliding Dilemmas: Interactions Of Locally Adaptive Strategies In A Hospital Setting , 2011 .
[16] K. Weick,et al. Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005 .
[17] Carl Rollenhagen,et al. Event investigations at nuclear power plants in Sweden: Reflections about a method and some associated practices , 2011 .
[18] David D. Woods John Wreathall. STRESS-STRAIN PLOTS AS A BASIS FOR ASSESSING SYSTEM RESILIENCE , 2016 .
[19] James T. Reason,et al. Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .
[20] Christopher Nemeth,et al. Remaining sensitive to the possibility of failure , 2008 .
[21] Sidney Dekker,et al. Anticipating the effects of technological change: A new era of dynamics for human factors , 2000 .
[22] Erik Hollnagel,et al. Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2005 .
[23] E. Hollnagel,et al. What-You-Look-For-Is-What-You-Find - The consequences of underlying accident models in eight accident investigation manuals , 2009 .
[24] B. Brehmer. Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems. , 1992, Acta psychologica.
[25] Sidney Dekker,et al. Drift into Failure: From Hunting Broken Components to Understanding Complex Systems , 2011 .
[26] Emily S. Patterson,et al. Collaborative cross-checking to enhance resilience , 2005, Cognition, Technology & Work.
[27] E. Hollnagel. The Etto Principle: Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off: Why Things That Go Right Sometimes Go Wrong , 2009 .
[28] G. McCarthy. FRAM: the functional resonance analysis method, modelling complex socio-technical systems , 2013 .
[29] E. Hollnagel. FRAM: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method: Modelling Complex Socio-technical Systems , 2012 .
[30] David D. Woods,et al. Price of flexibility in intelligent interfaces , 1993, Knowl. Based Syst..
[31] Sophia Antipolis,et al. L'ÉCOLE NATIONALE SUPÉRIEURE DES MINES DE PARIS , 2007 .
[32] David D Woods,et al. Steering the Reverberations of Technology Change on Fields of Practice: Laws that Govern Cognitive Work , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
[33] Tom Kontogiannis,et al. A contemporary view of organizational safety: variability and interactions of organizational processes , 2010, Cognition, Technology & Work.
[34] Sidney W A Dekker,et al. Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on error and performance. , 2002, Journal of safety research.
[35] B. Fischhoff,et al. Hindsight ≠ foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty* , 2003 .
[36] Robert L. Wears,et al. Exploring the Dynamics of Resilient Performance , 2011 .
[37] N B Sarter,et al. LEARNING FROM AUTOMATION SURPRISES AND "GOING SOUR" ACCIDENTS. IN: COGNITIVE ENGINEERING IN THE AVIATION DOMAIN , 2000 .
[38] Erik Hollnagel,et al. Barriers And Accident Prevention , 2004 .
[39] Herbert A. Simon,et al. The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .
[40] José Orlando Gomes,et al. Handoff strategies in settings with high consequences for failure: lessons for health care operations. , 2004, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.
[41] E Hollnagel. Cognitive system performance analysis , 1986 .
[42] J. E. Groves,et al. Made in America: Science, Technology and American Modernist Poets , 1989 .
[43] Christopher D. Wickens,et al. ANALYSIS OF PILOTS' MONITORING AND PERFORMANCE ON AN AUTOMATED FLIGHT DECK , 2001 .
[44] George W. Furnas,et al. Making sense of sensemaking , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.
[45] M. Weggeman. Sensemaking in organisations , 1996 .
[46] B. Fischhoff,et al. Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. , 1975 .
[47] Robert L. Wears,et al. Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.
[48] Sidney Dekker,et al. Ten Questions About Human Error : A New View of Human Factors and System Safety , 2004 .
[49] C. Boddy. A rose by any other name may smell as sweet but “group discussion” is not another name for a “focus group” nor should it be , 2005 .
[50] Snorre Sklet,et al. Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.
[51] Richard I. Cook,et al. Regularly irregular: how groups reconcile cross-cutting agendas and demand in healthcare , 2007, Cognition, Technology & Work.
[52] Richard I. Cook,et al. SPECIAL SECTION: Adapting to New Technology in the Operating Room , 1996, Hum. Factors.
[53] David D. Woods,et al. Hollnagel’s test: being ‘in control’ of highly interdependent multi-layered networked systems , 2010, Cognition, Technology & Work.
[54] S. Dekker,et al. The complexity of failure: Implications of complexity theory for safety investigations , 2011 .
[55] D. Woods,et al. Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[56] R. Cook,et al. “Going solid”: a model of system dynamics and consequences for patient safety , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.
[57] F. Guldenmund. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research , 2000 .
[58] Gary Klein,et al. Making Sense of Sensemaking 1: Alternative Perspectives , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.
[59] Jonas Lundberg,et al. Strategies for dealing with resistance to recommendations from accident investigations. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[60] Viktor Mikhaĭlovich Glushkov,et al. An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957, The Mathematical Gazette.
[61] D. Woods,et al. Behind Human Error , 2010 .
[62] Christopher Nemeth,et al. Preparation and restoration , 2009 .
[63] Matthew B. Miles,et al. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .