Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Two‐Level Latent Variable Models with Mixed Continuous and Polytomous Data

Summary. Two-level data with hierarchical structure and mixed continuous and polytomous data are very common in biomedical research. In this article, we propose a maximum likelihood approach for analyzing a latent variable model with these data. The maximum likelihood estimates are obtained by a Monte Carlo EM algorithm that involves the Gibbs sampler for approximating the E-step and the M-step and the bridge sampling for monitoring the convergence. The approach is illustrated by a two-level data set concerning the development and preliminary findings from an AIDS preventative intervention for Filipina commercial sex workers where the relationship between some latent quantities is investigated.

[1]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  Fitting Full-Information Item Factor Models and an Empirical Investigation of Bridge Sampling , 1996 .

[2]  Louise Ryan,et al.  Bivariate Latent Variable Models for Clustered Discrete and Continuous Outcomes , 1992 .

[3]  P M Bentler,et al.  A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables. , 1995, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[4]  Wai-Yin Poon,et al.  ANALYSIS OF TWO-LEVEL STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS VIA EM TYPE ALGORITHMS , 1998 .

[5]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  EM and beyond , 1991 .

[6]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[7]  Sik-Yum Lee,et al.  Multilevel analysis of structural equation models , 1990 .

[8]  L. Ryan,et al.  Latent Variable Models for Mixed Discrete and Continuous Outcomes , 1997 .

[9]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  Balanced versus unbalanced designs for linear structural relations in two‐level data , 1989 .

[10]  H. Goldstein Multilevel mixed linear model analysis using iterative generalized least squares , 1986 .

[11]  B. Muthén A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators , 1984 .

[12]  J. C. Gower,et al.  Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. 2nd ed. , 1972 .

[13]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[14]  Jian Qing Shi,et al.  Bayesian sampling‐based approach for factor analysis models with continuous and polytomous data , 1998 .

[15]  G. C. Wei,et al.  A Monte Carlo Implementation of the EM Algorithm and the Poor Man's Data Augmentation Algorithms , 1990 .

[16]  J A Stein,et al.  The effects of establishment practices, knowledge and attitudes on condom use among Filipina sex workers. , 1998, AIDS care.

[17]  L. Ryan,et al.  Latent variable models with fixed effects. , 1996, Biometrics.

[18]  C. Robert Simulation of truncated normal variables , 2009, 0907.4010.

[19]  S Y Lee,et al.  Latent variable models with mixed continuous and polytomous data , 2001, Biometrics.

[20]  T. Louis Finding the Observed Information Matrix When Using the EM Algorithm , 1982 .

[21]  M. Aitkin,et al.  Statistical Modelling Issues in School Effectiveness Studies , 1986 .

[22]  Nicholas T. Longford,et al.  Factor analysis for clustered observations , 1992 .

[23]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[24]  Louise Ryan,et al.  Latent Variable Models for Teratogenesis Using Multiple Binary Outcomes , 1997 .

[25]  J. Booth,et al.  Maximizing generalized linear mixed model likelihoods with an automated Monte Carlo EM algorithm , 1999 .

[26]  M. Browne Robustness of statistical inference in factor analysis and related models , 1987 .

[27]  J. Loehlin Latent variable models , 1987 .

[28]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[29]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[30]  Beth A. Reboussin,et al.  An estimating equations approach for the LISCOMP model , 1998 .