Implementation of depression screening in antenatal clinics through tablet computers: results of a feasibility study

BackgroundMobile devices may facilitate depression screening in the waiting area of antenatal clinics. This can present implementation challenges, of which we focused on survey layout and technology deployment.MethodsWe assessed the feasibility of using tablet computers to administer a socio-demographic survey, the Whooley questions and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to 530 pregnant women attending National Health Service (NHS) antenatal clinics across England. We randomised participants to one of two layout versions of these surveys: (i) a scrolling layout where each survey was presented on a single screen; or (ii) a paging layout where only one question appeared on the screen at any given time.ResultsOverall, 85.10% of eligible pregnant women agreed to take part. Of these, 90.95% completed the study procedures. Approximately 23% of participants answered Yes to at least one Whooley question, and approximately 13% of them scored 10 points of more on the EPDS. We observed no association between survey layout and the responses given to the Whooley questions, the median EPDS scores, the number of participants at increased risk of self-harm, and the number of participants asking for technical assistance. However, we observed a difference in the number of participants at each EPDS scoring interval (p = 0.008), which provide an indication of a woman’s risk of depression. A scrolling layout resulted in faster completion times (median = 4 min 46 s) than a paging layout (median = 5 min 33 s) (p = 0.024). However, the clinical significance of this difference (47.5 s) is yet to be determined.ConclusionsTablet computers can be used for depression screening in the waiting area of antenatal clinics. This requires the careful consideration of clinical workflows, and technology-related issues such as connectivity and security. An association between survey layout and EPDS scoring intervals needs to be explored further to determine if it corresponds to a survey layout effect. Future research needs to evaluate the effect of this type of antenatal depression screening on clinical outcomes and clinic workflows.Trial registrationThis study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT02516982 on 20 July 2015.

[1]  J. Cox,et al.  Detection of Postnatal Depression , 1987, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[2]  W. Browner,et al.  Case-finding instruments for depression. Two questions are as good as many. , 1997, Journal of general internal medicine.

[3]  Jean Golding,et al.  The course of anxiety and depression through pregnancy and the postpartum in a community sample. , 2004, Journal of affective disorders.

[4]  T. Einarson,et al.  Prevalence of Depression During Pregnancy: Systematic Review , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  Gerald Gartlehner,et al.  Perinatal Depression: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Incidence , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  D. Veale,et al.  National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health , 2006 .

[7]  C. Monk,et al.  Impact of maternal stress, depression and anxiety on fetal neurobehavioral development. , 2009, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[9]  D. Stewart,et al.  Clinical practice. Depression during pregnancy. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Onil K Bhattacharyya,et al.  The waiting room "wait": from annoyance to opportunity. , 2013, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[11]  A. Stein,et al.  Maternal depression during pregnancy and the postnatal period: risks and possible mechanisms for offspring depression at age 18 years. , 2013, JAMA psychiatry.

[12]  A. Bauer,et al.  Costs of perinatal mental health problems , 2014 .

[13]  Florian Keusch THE INFLUENCE OF ANSWER BOX FORMAT ON RESPONSE BEHAVIOR ON LIST-STYLE OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS , 2014 .

[14]  Mick P. Couper,et al.  Mobile Web Survey Design: Scrolling versus Paging, SMS versus E-mail Invitations , 2014 .

[15]  Michael W. Link,et al.  Comparison of Smartphone and Online Computer Survey Administration , 2014 .

[16]  J. Bardram,et al.  Smartphone data as objective measures of bipolar disorder symptoms , 2014, Psychiatry Research.

[17]  Josip Car,et al.  Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[18]  F. Mensah,et al.  Maternal depression from early pregnancy to 4 years postpartum in a prospective pregnancy cohort study: implications for primary health care , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  Lyndal J. Trevena,et al.  Depression screening via a smartphone app: cross-country user characteristics and feasibility , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  H. Flynn,et al.  Development of a screening and recruitment registry to facilitate perinatal depression research in obstetrics settings in the USA , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[21]  K. Tabb,et al.  Perinatal depression screening in a Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program: perception of feasibility and acceptability among a multidisciplinary staff. , 2015, General hospital psychiatry.

[22]  K. Tabb,et al.  Clinic staff attitudes towards the use of mHealth technology to conduct perinatal depression screenings: a qualitative study , 2014, Family practice.

[23]  Ahmed M. Shaman,et al.  Does a Mobile Phone Depression-Screening App Motivate Mobile Phone Users With High Depressive Symptoms to Seek a Health Care Professional’s Help? , 2016, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  H Borgmann,et al.  [Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods]. , 2016, Der Urologe. Ausg. A.

[25]  P. Ramchandani,et al.  Effects of prenatal depressive symptoms on maternal and infant cortisol reactivity , 2016, Archives of Women's Mental Health.

[26]  D. Ary,et al.  MoodHacker Mobile Web App With Email for Adults to Self-Manage Mild-to-Moderate Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2016, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[27]  J. Car,et al.  Tablet computers for implementing NICE antenatal mental health guidelines: protocol of a feasibility study , 2016, BMJ Open.