Saving the Planet's Climate or Water Resources? The Trade-Off between Carbon and Water Footprints of

Abstract: Little information regarding the global water footprint of biofuels consumed in Europe is available. Therefore, the ultimate origin of feedstock underlying European biodiesel and bioethanol consumption was investigated and combined with the irrigation requirements of different crops in different countries. A (blue) water consumption of 1.9 m 3 in 12 countries per GJ of European biodiesel and 3.3 m 3 in 23 countries per GJ of bioethanol was determined. Even though this represents an increase by a factor of 60 and 40 compared to fossil diesel and gasoline, these figures are low compared to global average data. The assessment of local consequences has shown that the irrigation of sunflower seed in Spain causes 50% of the impacts resulting from biodiesel—even though it constitutes only 0.9% of the feedstock. In case of bioethanol production, the irrigation of sugar cane in Egypt, which constitutes only 0.7% of the underlying feedstock, causes 20% of the impacts. In a case study on passenger cars, it was shown that biofuels can reduce the global warming potential by circa 50% along the product life cycle. However, the price of this improvement is an approximate 19 times increased water consumption, and resulting local impacts are even more severe.

[1]  R. Newman Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources , 2014 .

[2]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The water footprint of bioenergy , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Markus Berger,et al.  Methodological Challenges in Volumetric and Impact‐Oriented Water Footprints , 2013 .

[4]  Matthias Finkbeiner,et al.  Indirect land use change - help beyond the hype? , 2014 .

[5]  Manuele Margni,et al.  A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use in LCA , 2010 .

[6]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  M. O'hare,et al.  Accounting for indirect land-use change in the life cycle assessment of biofuel supply chains , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[8]  Markus Berger,et al.  Water accounting and vulnerability evaluation (WAVE): considering atmospheric evaporation recycling and the risk of freshwater depletion in water footprinting. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Winnie Gerbens-Leenes,et al.  The water footprint of biofuel-based transport , 2011 .

[10]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crops products , 2011 .

[11]  Martina Flörke,et al.  Domestic and industrial water uses of the past 60 years as a mirror of socio-economic development: A global simulation study , 2013 .

[12]  Carlo Hamelinck,et al.  Greenhouse gas impact of marginal fossil fuel use , 2014 .

[13]  Jens Warsen,et al.  Water footprint of European cars: potential impacts of water consumption along automobile life cycles. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  S. Pfister,et al.  Monthly water stress: spatially and temporally explicit consumptive water footprint of global crop production , 2014 .

[15]  S. Pfister,et al.  Environmental impacts of water use in global crop production: hotspots and trade-offs with land use. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .