As Necessary as the Cleaning Crew: Experiences of Respect and Inclusion Among Full-Time Non-Tenure-Track Electrical Engineering Faculty at Research-Intensive Institutions

Contribution: This article explores issues of respect and inclusion among full-time non-tenure-track (NTT) electrical engineering faculty. Background: NTT faculty members are an important and growing part of electrical engineering programs in the USA. This article complements prior research on NTT faculty member career satisfaction and effectiveness, providing perspectives from the NTT faculty members themselves on their experiences with respect and inclusion. Research Question: The research question for this article is: How do NTT faculty members experience respect and inclusion in electrical engineering departmental cultures? Methodology: Using a qualitative design and semi-structured interview protocol, data were collected via 45-min interviews with 13 full-time NTT engineering faculty. The analysis used thematic coding. Findings: Most participants in this article work in departmental cultures that diminish their effectiveness. They are keenly aware of whether they feel respected and included in their department and these factors significantly affect their career satisfaction. Many of the participants have been specifically excluded from departmental discussion affecting their work, have suffered the effects of policies that are biased against them, and have been told directly or indirectly that their appointments are not valued by their administration or other faculty.

[1]  Adrianna Kezar,et al.  Departmental Cultures and Non-Tenure-Track Faculty: Willingness, Capacity, and Opportunity to Perform at Four-Year Institutions , 2013 .

[2]  Lea Tufford,et al.  Bracketing in Qualitative Research , 2012 .

[3]  Roni Strier,et al.  Power Relations in Qualitative Research , 2009, Qualitative health research.

[4]  Melvin Blumberg,et al.  The Missing Opportunity in Organizational Research: Some Implications for a Theory of Work Performance , 1982 .

[5]  K. Murphy,et al.  Sensitive Interviewing in Qualitative Research. , 2016, Research in nursing & health.

[6]  Alice L. Pawley,et al.  Shifting the “Default”: The Case for Making Diversity the Expected Condition for Engineering Education and Making Whiteness and Maleness Visible , 2017 .

[7]  J. H. Frey,et al.  The Interview: From Neutral Stance to Political Involvement. , 2005 .

[8]  Carole J Bland,et al.  The Impact of Appointment Type on the Productivity and Commitment of Full-Time Faculty in Research and Doctoral Institutions , 2006 .

[9]  Randa L. Shehab,et al.  The career goals of non-tenure-track full-time engineering faculty , 2016, 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[10]  K. Paerregaard Making the Best of Both Worlds , 2020, Linking Separate Worlds.

[11]  D. Trytten,et al.  The Career Pathways of Non-tenure-track Full-time Engineering Faculty , 2018 .

[12]  Ann E. Austin,et al.  Rethinking Faculty Work: Higher Education's Strategic Imperative , 2007 .

[13]  John S. Levin,et al.  The Hybrid and Dualistic Identity of Full-Time Non-Tenure-Track Faculty , 2011 .

[14]  M. Crotty The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process , 1998 .

[15]  Catherine T. Amelink,et al.  Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education , 2009 .

[16]  Judith M. Gappa,et al.  The Invisible Faculty: Improving the Status of Part-Timers in Higher Education , 1993 .

[17]  J. Gould Sampling and Generalization , 2001 .

[18]  Paul D. Umbach How Effective Are They? Exploring the Impact of Contingent Faculty on Undergraduate Education , 2006 .