Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching.

How do people choose an action to satisfy a goal from among the actions that are afforded by the environment? In 3 experiments the action modes used by actors to reach for a block placed at various distances from them were observed. In each experiment, when actors were not restricted in how they could reach for the object, the transition from their reaching using only arm extension to a mode of reaching in which they used the upper torso to lean forward occurred at closer distances than each actor's absolute critical boundary, beyond which the former action was no longer afforded. In Experiments 2 and 3 actors' seated posture was varied so that the effect of postural dynamics on the distance at which actors actually chose to make the transition between action modes, the preferred critical boundary, could be examined. The results are consistent with the proposal that the preferred critical boundary reflects the relative comfort of available modes of reaching.

[1]  L S Mark,et al.  The effect of gap depth on the perception of whether a gap is crossable , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Heft Harry,et al.  A Methodological Note on Overestimates of Reaching Distance: Distinguishing Between Perceptual and Analytical Judgments , 1993 .

[3]  J. Konczak,et al.  Changing affordances in stair climbing: the perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  James A. Balliett,et al.  What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. , 1990 .

[5]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visually perceiving what is reachable. , 1989 .

[6]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  Affordances as constraints on the control of stance , 1988 .

[7]  L S Mark,et al.  A biodynamic basis for perceived categories of action: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  W. Warren,et al.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[12]  J. Cutting Two Ecological Perspectives: Gibson vs. Shaw and Turvey , 1982 .

[13]  S. Runeson,et al.  Visual perception of lifted weight. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  D. F. Hoyt,et al.  Gait and the energetics of locomotion in horses , 1981, Nature.

[15]  J. Gibson,et al.  A theoretical field-analysis of automobile-driving , 1938 .

[16]  R. J. Bootsma,et al.  Studies in Perception and Action III , 1995 .

[17]  Reinoud J. Bootsma,et al.  The Effects of Anxiety on Perceiving the Reachability of Passing Objects , 1992 .

[18]  P. B. Pufall,et al.  Perceiving Whether or Not the World Affords Stepping Onto and Over: A Developmental Study , 1992 .

[19]  K. Newell,et al.  Body scale and the development of prehension. , 1989, Developmental psychobiology.

[20]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .