UK media representations of carbon capture and storage: actors, frames and metaphors

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a climate change mitigation technology which has had a rather chequered history in British policy making and in the British public sphere. This article deals with the neglected topic of representations of CCS in the British media and their possible impact on public perceptions and public policy. Public perception of CCS is shaped in part by the media which provide tools for making sense of complex technological and political issues such as CCS. This article compares articles on CCS in two UK newspapers, one national (“The Times”) and one regional (“The Aberdeen Press and Journal”) in 2011, a year during which some of the last battles over CCS demonstration projects were fought. It applies frame and metaphor analysis to a corpus of 150 articles. Findings reveal that during 2011 CCS coverage moved through a cycle of hype and disillusionment, with both newspapers reaching a trough of disappointment at the end of 2011. It will be difficult to reignite interest in CCS in this context, both in terms of media and public attention, and in terms of policy and investment. Regional confidence in national CCS policy in particular will be difficult to recover.

[1]  Naomi Oreskes,et al.  Metaphors of warfare and the lessons of history: time to revisit a carbon tax? , 2011 .

[2]  Chris Mooney,et al.  Framing Science , 2007, Science.

[3]  Alison Anderson,et al.  The Framing of Nanotechnologies in the British Newspaper Press , 2005 .

[4]  Brigitte Nerlich,et al.  Metaphors We Die By? Geoengineering, Metaphors, and the Argument From Catastrophe , 2012 .

[5]  Minh Ha-Duong,et al.  A survey on the public perception of CCS in France , 2009 .

[6]  David W. Keith,et al.  Fossil Fuels Without CO2 Emissions , 1998, Science.

[7]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Informed public opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options , 2009 .

[8]  Matthew C. Nisbet,et al.  Public Opinion and Participation , 2011 .

[9]  B. Nerlich ‘Low carbon’ metals, markets and metaphors: the creation of economic expectations about climate change mitigation , 2011, Climatic Change.

[10]  Benjamin Evar,et al.  The Social Dynamics of Carbon Capture and Storage , 2012 .

[11]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects , 1997 .

[12]  B. Nerlich,et al.  Avian flu: the creation of expectations in the interplay between science and the media. , 2007, Sociology of health & illness.

[13]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  From research to action: now we have to move on CCS communication , 2010 .

[14]  Anders Hansson COLONIZING THE FUTURE: The case of CCS , 2012 .

[15]  A. Hansson,et al.  Capturing the stories of corporations: A comparison of media debates on carbon capture and storage in Norway and Sweden , 2011 .

[16]  Mads Borup,et al.  The sociology of expectations in science and technology , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[17]  D. Shaw,et al.  Agenda setting function of mass media , 1972 .

[18]  Amanda D. Boyd,et al.  Front page or “buried” beneath the fold? Media coverage of carbon capture and storage , 2014, Public understanding of science.

[19]  Matthew C. Nisbet,et al.  Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter for Public Engagement , 2009 .

[20]  Clair Gough,et al.  Media framing of new technology, the case of carbon capture and storage , 2006 .

[21]  M. McCombs A Look at Agenda-setting: past, present and future , 2005 .

[22]  M. Morrison,et al.  Exploring the Role of Dedicated Online Biotechnology News Providers in the Innovation Economy , 2012 .