Utility in a Fallible Tool: A Multi-Site Case Study of Automated Writing Evaluation.

Automated writing evaluation (AWE) software uses artificial intelligence (AI) to score student essays and support revision. We studied how an AWE program called MY Access!® was used in eight middle schools in Southern California over a three-year period. Although many teachers and students considered automated scoring unreliable, and teachers’ use of AWE was limited by the desire to use conventional writing methods, use of the software still brought important benefits. Observations, interviews, and a survey indicated that using AWE simplified classroom management and increased students’ motivation to write and revise.

[1]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[2]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  Thought and Language , 1963 .

[3]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[4]  Carole A. Ames,et al.  Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Students' Learning Strategies and Motivation Processes , 1988 .

[5]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Automated Essay Scoring in the Classroom , 2006 .

[6]  Carole A. Ames Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .

[7]  Jill Burstein,et al.  AUTOMATED ESSAY SCORING WITH E‐RATER® V.2.0 , 2004 .

[8]  Jill Burstein,et al.  Automated Essay Scoring : A Cross-disciplinary Perspective , 2003 .

[9]  Rob Kling,et al.  What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter? , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[10]  Jinhao Wang,et al.  Automated Essay Scoring Versus Human Scoring: A Comparative Study , 2007 .

[11]  Yigal Attali,et al.  CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF E‐RATER® IN SCORING TOEFL® ESSAYS , 2007 .

[12]  Randy M. Kaplan,et al.  SCORING ESSAYS AUTOMATICALLY USING SURFACE FEATURES , 1998 .

[13]  Christina Parker,et al.  Laptops and Literacy: Learning in the Wireless Classroom , 2007 .

[14]  W. Douglas Baker "Layers and Layers" of Teaching Writers' Worskshop: A Response to Katie Wood Ray's The Writing Workshop , 2005 .

[15]  J. Suls,et al.  Flawed Self-Assessment , 2004, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[16]  Chi-Fen Emily Chen,et al.  Beyond the Design of Automated Writing Evaluation: Pedagogical Practices and Perceived Learning Effectiveness in EFL Writing Classes. , 2008 .

[17]  Julie Cheville,et al.  Automated Scoring Technologies and the Rising Influence of Error. , 2004 .

[18]  Samuel Totten Book Review of The Neglected "R": The Need for a Writing Revolution , 2004 .

[19]  Eric M. Anderman,et al.  Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  Johan Bos Towards Wide-Coverage Semantic Interpretation , 2005 .

[21]  Nancie Atwell,et al.  In the Middle: New Understandings about Writing, Reading, and Learning. Second Edition. , 1998 .

[22]  Donald E. Powers,et al.  STUMPING E‐RATER: CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF AUTOMATED ESSAY SCORING , 2001 .

[23]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[24]  Sara Dexter,et al.  Students' Experiences with an Automated Essay Scorer. , 2008 .

[25]  E. B. Page Computer Grading of Student Prose, Using Modern Concepts and Software , 1994 .

[26]  M. Warschauer,et al.  Automated Writing Assessment in the Classroom , 2008 .

[27]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication , 1996 .

[28]  Frank Pajares,et al.  Toward a Positive Psychology of Academic Motivation , 2001 .

[29]  J. Schroeder,et al.  The Impact of Criterion Writing Evaluation Technology on Criminal Justice Student Writing Skills , 2008 .

[30]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interactivity in human–computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence , 2000 .

[31]  Alex Vernon,et al.  Computerized grammar checkers 2000: capabilities, limitations, and pedagogical possibilities , 2000 .

[32]  Ellis B. Page,et al.  Statistical and Linguistic Strategies in the Computer Grading of Essays , 1967, COLING.

[33]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  Automated Essay Scoring: Applications to Educational Technology , 1999 .

[34]  P. Tyre,et al.  Fourth-grade slump. , 2007, Newsweek.

[35]  Cynthia L. Selfe,et al.  CCCC position statement on teaching, learning, and assessing writing in digital environments , 2004 .

[36]  Mark D. Shermis,et al.  The Impact of Automated Essay Scoring on Writing Outcomes , 2008 .

[37]  Anastasiya A. Lipnevich,et al.  RESPONSE TO ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK: THE EFFECTS OF GRADES, PRAISE, AND SOURCE OF INFORMATION , 2008 .

[38]  Sara Dexter,et al.  Experimental Evidence on the Effectiveness of Automated Essay Scoring in Teacher Education Cases , 2006 .

[39]  Lester Faigley,et al.  Competing Theories of Process: A Critique and a Proposal. , 1986 .

[40]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Middle school use of automated writing evaluation: a multi-site case study , 2008 .

[41]  Larry Cuban Teachers and machines : the classroom use of technology since 1920 , 1986 .

[42]  David M. Williamson A Framework for Implementing Automated Scoring , 2009 .

[43]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Laptops and Literacy: Learning in the Wireless Classroom , 2006 .

[44]  Peter Elbow,et al.  Writing with power : techniques for mastering the writing process , 1981 .

[45]  Richard H. Haswell,et al.  Machine Scoring of Student Essays , 2006 .

[46]  Jill Fitzgerald,et al.  Research on Revision in Writing , 1987 .

[47]  Martin Chodorow,et al.  Automated Essay Evaluation: The Criterion Online Writing Service , 2004, AI Mag..

[48]  Robert N. Kantor,et al.  ANALYTIC SCORING OF TOEFL® CBT ESSAYS: SCORES FROM HUMANS AND E‐RATER® , 2008 .

[49]  Colette Daiute,et al.  Collaboration Between Children Learning to Write: Can Novices Be Masters? , 1993 .

[50]  L. S. Vygotksy Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[51]  G. Hillocks,et al.  Research on written composition , 1986 .

[52]  Rob Kling,et al.  Learning About Information Technologies and Social Change: The Contribution of Social Informatics , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[53]  Anat Ben-Simon,et al.  Toward More Substantively Meaningful Automated Essay Scoring , 2007 .

[54]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  An efficient incremental architecture for robust interpretation , 2002 .

[55]  Anat Ben-Simon,et al.  The Effect of Specific Language Features on the Complexity of Systems for Automated Essay Scoring. , 2003 .

[56]  M. Lepper,et al.  A desire to be taught: Instructional consequences of intrinsic motivation , 1992 .

[57]  L. Flower Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision , 1986, College Composition & Communication.

[58]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Laptops and Fourth-Grade Literacy: Assisting the Jump over the Fourth-Grade Slump. , 2010 .

[59]  C. Dweck,et al.  Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[60]  B. Huot,et al.  Computers and Assessment: Understanding Two Technologies. , 1996 .

[61]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[62]  Carol Booth Olson,et al.  The Reading/Writing Connection: Strategies for Teaching and Learning in the Secondary Classroom , 2002 .

[63]  Daniel G. McDonald,et al.  I'm not a real doctor, but I play one in virtual reality: implications of virtual reality for judgments about reality , 1992 .

[64]  Derrick Higgins,et al.  Evaluating the Construct-Coverage of the e-rater[R] Scoring Engine. Research Report. ETS RR-09-01. , 2009 .

[65]  P. Twining Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom , 2002 .

[66]  Andrea Everard,et al.  Does spell-checking software need a warning label? , 2005, CACM.

[67]  N. Sommers Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers , 1980, College Composition & Communication.

[68]  Geoffrey L. Hammond Foreward , 2010, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[69]  J. Dewey Democracy and education : an introduction to the philosophy of education , 1961 .

[70]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  The elements of computer credibility , 1999, CHI '99.

[71]  Ian Blood,et al.  Automated Essay Scoring: A Literature Review , 2011 .

[72]  M. Warschauer,et al.  Learning with Laptops: A Multi-Method Case Study , 2008 .