Morpheme learning of children with specific language impairment under controlled instructional conditions.

Three groups of children were exposed to instances of a novel morpheme under controlled experimental conditions. The performance of 32 children with specific language impairment (SLI), aged 5:0 to 7:0 years (years:months), was compared to that of 24 normally developing children matched for age and nonverbal ability and 20 younger normally developing children matched for language development and nonverbal ability. The children were taught under two instructional conditions that differed only in whether the child was asked to imitate the new language form after each instance (imitation) or just to observe its use (modeling). Consistent with past research (Connell, 1987b), the children with SLI performed significantly better under the imitation condition than under modeling, but the age-matched controls showed no difference in response to instruction. The performance of the language-matched controls was similar to that of the age-matched controls, suggesting that the instruction-specific effect for the children with SLI is not merely a function of general language immaturity. Although the superiority of the imitation condition for the children with SLI was evident for test trials requiring production of the new morpheme (as in past research), no such effect was evident for comprehension trials. This differing effect of output demands suggests that the SLI-specific response to instruction is not a matter of different mastery of the new rule but rather is specific to the need to access the newly induced rule on production trials. The accessing of phonological representations as a possible explanation for the effect is discussed.

[1]  Paula Tallal,et al.  The relationship between auditory temporal analysis and receptive language development: Evidence from studies of developmental language disorder , 1985, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  C. Stone,et al.  Visual Imagery Skills and Language Abilities of Normal and Language-Learning-Disabled Children , 1991 .

[3]  P. Connell,et al.  The use of an invented language rule in the differentiation of normal and language-impaired Spanish-speaking children. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  B. Liles Production and comprehension of narrative discourse in normal and language disordered children. , 1985, Journal of communication disorders.

[5]  R B Gillam,et al.  Development of print awareness in language-disordered preschoolers. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[7]  P. Savich Anticipatory imagery ability in normal and language-disabled children. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  S. E. Weismer Constructive Comprehension Abilities Exhibited by Language-Disordered Children , 1985 .

[9]  J. A. Courtright,et al.  Imitative modeling as a language intervention strategy: the effects of two mediating variables. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  A. Kamhi,et al.  Word, syllable, and sound awareness in language-disordered children. , 1985, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[11]  B. Liles Episode organization and cohesive conjunctives in narratives of children with and without language disorder. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  L. Lombardino,et al.  Play diversity and structural relationships in the play and language of language-impaired and language-normal preschoolers: preliminary data. , 1986, Journal of communication disorders.

[13]  R S Chapman,et al.  The relation between age and mean length of utterance in morphemes. , 1981, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  Paula Tallal,et al.  Identification of language-impaired children on the basis of rapid perception and production skills , 1985, Brain and Language.

[15]  J. Johnston,et al.  Mental rotation abilities in language-disordered children. , 1983, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  R. F. Lee,et al.  The ability of language-disordered children to use and modify hypotheses in discrimination learning , 1985, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[17]  L. L. Elliott,et al.  Fine-grained auditory discrimination in normal children and children with language-learning problems. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[18]  B. Brinton,et al.  Responses to requests for clarification in linguistically normal and language-impaired children. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[19]  H. Catts,et al.  Toward an understanding of developmental language and reading disorders. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[20]  A. Kamhi,et al.  Metalinguistic Awareness in Normal and Language-Disordered Children , 1985 .

[21]  B. Lewis,et al.  Hypothesis-testing and nonlinguistic symbolic abilities in language-impaired children. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[22]  P. Connell An effect of modeling and imitation teaching procedures on children with and without specific language impairment. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[23]  Irving Lorge,et al.  Columbia mental maturity scale , 1954 .

[24]  Eric Wanner,et al.  Language acquisition: the state of the art , 1982 .