Engagement of portfolio manager in assessing relative priority of project activities: Authority or perspective matter?*

Authority struggles are mostly coincident with relational conflicts that impede rational solutions and have destructive impacts on performance. This study revealed that disagreements with the portfolio manager about relative priority of project activities seem, to the project managers, to be groundless and are therefore suspected as authority matters. The results from implementation of a developed multiple-criteria decision-making simulation on a realistic field scenario showed that such conflicts may result from the wider perspective of the portfolio manager. Project managers’ awareness of this insight may reduce the intensity of such conflicts and by that, decrease their negative effect on the performance.

[1]  Gregory Gurevich,et al.  Planning and Controlling Projects under Uncertainty , 2015 .

[2]  E. Sadler‐Smith,et al.  The Role of Intuition in Strategic Decision Making , 2009 .

[3]  Roger Atkinson,et al.  Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria , 1999 .

[4]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[5]  Gregory Gurevich,et al.  A Simulation-Based Decision Support System for Managing Information Technology Project Portfolios , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Proj. Manag..

[6]  Baruch Keren,et al.  Decision support model for ranking project network activities based on multiple criteria of precedence, duration and cost , 2013 .

[7]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[8]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  ABC inventory classification with multiple-criteria using weighted linear optimization , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[9]  Jeffrey K. Pinto.  The Project Management Institute Project Management Handbook (Jossey-Bass Business & Management Series) , 1998 .

[10]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Top‐down, bottom‐up, or both? Toward an integrative perspective on operations strategy formation , 2014 .

[11]  Norman R. F. Maier,et al.  Acceptance and Quality of Solutions as Related to Leaders' Attitudes toward Disagreement in Group Problem Solving , 1965 .

[12]  B Wedge,et al.  Conflict Management , 2019, Cases in Public Relations Management.

[13]  P. Costa,et al.  The five-factor theory of personality. , 2008 .

[14]  D. Wilemon,et al.  Diagnosing conflict determinants in project management , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[15]  D. Jonas.  Empowering project portfolio managers: How management involvement impacts project portfolio management performance , 2010 .

[16]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[17]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Constructively managing conflicts in organizations , 2014 .

[18]  Gregory Gurevich,et al.  PERT-type projects: time–cost tradeoffs under uncertainty , 2013, Simul..

[19]  Carl B Traylor.  Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling , 2014 .

[20]  Ofer Zwikael,et al.  Top management involvement in project management. Exclusive support practices for different project scenarios , 2008 .

[21]  David W. Augsburger.  Conflict Mediation Across Cultures: Pathways and Patterns , 1992 .

[22]  Kasey Thompson,et al.  The Gauge That Pays: Project Navigation and Team Building , 2007 .

[23]  Erik Demeulemeester,et al.  A new approach for quantitative risk analysis , 2010, Annals of Operations Research.

[24]  Erik Demeulemeester,et al.  Project risk management: A new approach , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[25]  D. Vose.  Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide , 2000 .