Improving the prevention and control of hazardous substance exposures: a randomized controlled trial in manufacturing worksites.

BACKGROUND New measures of exposure prevention (EP) activity were used to evaluate the effectiveness of a 16-month management-focused intervention addressing hazardous substance exposures in manufacturing work settings. METHODS EP efforts were assessed using a rating scheme developed for this study. The rating scheme yields a set of measures of exposure potential and protection, which are combined into an overall EP summary rating. A randomized, controlled design was used to assess intervention effectiveness. Fifteen large manufacturing worksites completed the 16-month intervention and follow-up assessments. Analyses were conducted on the 107 production processes assessed at both baseline and final. RESULTS Patterns of improvement within the intervention condition were consistent with the intervention emphasis on upstream or source-focused intervention; whereas patterns in controls were consistent with prevalent practice (more downstream, worker-focused). A mixed model analysis of variance showed greater improvement in EP ratings in intervention versus controls, but the difference in improvement was moderate and statistically non-significant. CONCLUSIONS This study has demonstrated that EP efforts in the manufacturing sector can be systematically assessed across the full range of hazardous substances in use, and that such assessments can serve both needs assessment and effectiveness evaluation functions. Findings suggest that more sustained or intense management-focused intervention would significantly improve EP activity in manufacturing settings.

[1]  Linda M. Goldenhar,et al.  Guide to Evaluating the Effectiveness of Strategies for Preventing Work Injuries: How to Show Whether a Safety Intervention Really Works , 2001 .

[2]  K. Glanz,et al.  An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs , 1988, Health education quarterly.

[3]  D. Christiani,et al.  Prevention of Work-Related Cancers , 2002, New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS.

[4]  P. Landrigan,et al.  Occupational injury and illness in the United States. Estimates of costs, morbidity, and mortality. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  H S Shannon,et al.  Creating safer and healthier workplaces: role of organizational factors and job characteristics. , 2001, American Journal of Industrial Medicine.

[6]  A M Stoddard,et al.  Assessing and intervening on OSH programmes: effectiveness evaluation of the Wellworks-2 intervention in 15 manufacturing worksites , 2004, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[7]  DeAnn Lazovich,et al.  Effectiveness of a worksite intervention to reduce an occupational exposure: the Minnesota wood dust study. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[8]  R. Levins,et al.  The precautionary principle in environmental science. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[9]  M. Quinn Occupational health, public health, worker health. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[10]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Industrial hygiene recommendations as interventions: a collaborative model within occupational medicine. , 1999, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[11]  David C Christiani,et al.  An exposure prevention rating method for intervention needs assessment and effectiveness evaluation. , 2003, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[12]  A. Lamontagne,et al.  Process Evaluation of an Integrated Health Promotion/Occupational Health Model in WellWorks-2 , 2005, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[13]  D. Lazovich,et al.  Designing intervention effectiveness studies for occupational health and safety: The Minnesota Wood Dust Study. , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[14]  C. Heaney,et al.  The Intervention Research Process in Occupational Safety and Health: An Overview From the National Occupational Research Agenda Intervention Effectiveness Research Team , 2001, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[15]  C. Heaney,et al.  Worksite Health Programs: Working Together to Advance Employee Health , 1996, Health education quarterly.

[16]  Lynda S. Robson,et al.  Methodological criteria for evaluating occupational safety intervention research 1 On behalf of the , 1999 .

[17]  Rafael Moure-Eraso,et al.  Prevention strategies in industrial hygiene: a critical literature review. , 2003, AIHA journal : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[18]  A. Lamontagne,et al.  Exposure databases and exposure surveillance: promise and practice. , 2002, AIHA journal : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[19]  K Geiser,et al.  Sustainable production: a proposed strategy for the work environment. , 1998, American journal of industrial medicine.

[20]  A. Lamontagne Integrating health promotion and health protection in the workplace , 2004 .

[21]  Anthony D. LaMontagne,et al.  A comprehensive worksite cancer prevention intervention: behavior change results from a randomized controlled trial (United States) , 2004, Cancer Causes & Control.

[22]  B. Flay Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. , 1986, Preventive medicine.