Are You Minority Enough? Language Ability Affects Targets' and Perceivers' Assessments of a Candidate's Appropriateness for Affirmative Action

In the present study, we focus on Spanish language ability as a predictor of the extent to which Latinos are viewed by both others and themselves as full-fledged minorities. Study 1 shows that perceivers viewed Latinos described as Spanish speakers as more appropriate for race-based affirmative action than Latinos who were unable to speak Spanish (controlling for intellectual competence evaluations). Moreover, the affirmative action advantage that the Spanish-speaking Latinos had over the non-Spanish-speaking Latinos was explained by perceivers viewing the Spanish speakers as having greater minority status. The results of Study 2 suggest that Spanish-speaking ability is related to self-perceptions of minority status among Latinos. Like their perceivers in Study 1, Latinos who have less Spanish-speaking ability feel less Latino and report reluctance to apply for race-based assistance in the form of academic minority scholarships.

[1]  Keith B. Maddox,et al.  Cognitive Representations of Black Americans: Reexploring the Role of Skin Tone , 2002 .

[2]  D. Sanchez,et al.  To Disclose or Not to Disclose Biracial Identity: The Effect of Biracial Disclosure on Perceiver Evaluations and Target Responses , 2009 .

[3]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  The effects of skin tone on race-related amygdala activity: an fMRI investigation. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[4]  Cheryl R. Kaiser,et al.  Distributing prejudice unequally: do Whites direct their prejudice toward strongly identified minorities? , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  S. Smith,et al.  Intraracial Diversity and Relations among African‐Americans: Closeness among Black Students at a Predominantly White University1 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  Subtyping and Subgrouping: Processes for the Prevention and Promotion of Stereotype Change , 2001 .

[7]  Tapabrata Maiti,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.) , 2006 .

[8]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[9]  P. Silvia,et al.  Responding to Deviance: Target Exclusion and Differential Devaluation , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[10]  D. Bandalos The Effects of Item Parceling on Goodness-of-Fit and Parameter Estimate Bias in Structural Equation Modeling , 2002 .

[11]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  When Professionals Become Mothers, Warmth Doesn't Cut the Ice , 2004 .

[12]  R. Spears,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Jetten Et Al. / Meanings of Body Markings Rebels with a Cause: Group Identification as a Response to Perceived Discrimination from the Mainstream , 2022 .

[13]  S. French,et al.  Ethnicity‐Related Stressors and Mental Health in Latino Americans: The Moderating Role of Parental Racial Socialization , 2007 .

[14]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Darío Páez,et al.  The ‘Black Sheep Effect’: Social Categorization, Rejection of Ingroup Deviates, and Perception of Group Variability , 1994 .

[16]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: the role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  S Hoey,et al.  Concealable stigmas and positive self-perceptions: feeling better around similar others. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  James Jaccard,et al.  Arbitrary metrics in psychology. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[19]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[20]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Intergroup relations and group solidarity : Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction , 1996 .

[21]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[22]  J R Nesselroade,et al.  Reporting structural equation modeling results in Psychology and Aging: some proposed guidelines. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[23]  M. Alegría,et al.  Prevalence and Correlates of Everyday Discrimination among U.S. Latinos. , 2008, Journal of community psychology.

[24]  Keith B. Maddox,et al.  Perspectives on Racial Phenotypicality Bias , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[25]  J. N. Shelton,et al.  The role of racial identity in perceived racial discrimination. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  M. Rosenberg Society and the adolescent self-image , 1966 .

[27]  J. Crocker,et al.  A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation of One's Social Identity , 1992 .

[28]  M. Barron,et al.  Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. , 1964 .

[29]  A. Moore,et al.  To disclose or not to disclose , 2008 .

[30]  P. Killeen,et al.  An Alternative to Null-Hypothesis Significance Tests , 2005, Psychological science.

[31]  D. J. Lee Society and the Adolescent Self-Image , 1969 .

[32]  Michael M. Franz,et al.  Latino Phenotypic Discrimination Revisited: The Impact of Skin Color on Occupational Status * , 2002 .

[33]  Lisa M. Edwards,et al.  Coping With Discrimination Among Mexican Descent Adolescents , 2008 .

[34]  Jill D. Egeth,et al.  Measures of Ethnicity-Related Stress: Psychometric Properties, Ethnic Group Differences, and Associations With Well-Being1 , 2001 .

[35]  Elizabeth George,et al.  Why Does Dissimilarity Matter? Exploring Self-Categorization, Self-Enhancement, and Uncertainty Reduction , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.