Activity-rest stimulation of latissimus dorsi for cardiomyoplasty: 1-year results in sheep.

BACKGROUND In dynamic cardiomyoplasty electro-stimulation achieves full transformation of the latissimus dorsi (LD); therefore, its slowness limits the systolic support. Daily activity-rest could maintain partial transformation of the LD. METHODS Sheep LD were burst-stimulated either 10 or 24 hours/day. Before and 2, 4, 6, and 12 months after stimulation, LD power output, fatigue resistance, and tetanic fusion frequency were assessed. Latissimus dorsi were biopsied at 6 months, and sheep sacrificed at 12 months. RESULTS After 1 year of 10 hours/day stimulation LD was substantially conserved and contained large amounts of fast type myosin. From 2 months to 1 year of stimulation the power per muscle of the daily rested LD was greater than that of the left ventricle, being three to four times higher than in the 24-hour/day stimulation. CONCLUSIONS If extended to humans, these results could be the rationale for the need of a cardiomyostimulator, whose discontinuous activity could offer to patients the long-standing advantage of a faster and powerful muscle contraction.

[1]  M. Sandri,et al.  Molecular Markers of muscle Plasticity, damage, regeneration and repair. , 1999 .

[2]  G B Jacobs,et al.  Is it possible to perform immediate cardiac assist using untrained latissimus dorsi muscle in a work-rest regimen? , 1995, ASAIO journal.

[3]  M. Sandri,et al.  Exercise Induces Myonuclear Ubiquitination and Apoptosis in Dystrophin‐deficient Muscle of Mice , 1997, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[4]  Y Taenaka,et al.  Power of the fatigue resistant in situ latissimus dorsi muscle. , 1995, ASAIO journal.

[5]  Relation between muscle contraction speed and hydraulic performance in skeletal muscle ventricles. , 1997, Circulation.

[6]  W. Anderson,et al.  Cardiomyoplasty: Transformation of the Assisting Muscle Using Intermittent Versus Continuous Stimulation , 1996, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[7]  A. Carpentier,et al.  Preliminary report: follow-up after dynamic cardiomyoplasty , 1990, The Lancet.

[8]  O. Alfieri,et al.  Beat-to-beat analysis of left ventricular pressure-volume relation and stroke volume by conductance catheter and aortic Modelflow in cardiomyoplasty patients. , 1995, Circulation.

[9]  J. Jarvis,et al.  Cardiomyoplasty. A critical review of experimental and clinical results. , 1994, Circulation.

[10]  R. Weiss,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of chronic changes in latissimus dorsi cardiomyoplasty. , 1994, Circulation.

[11]  A. Cohen-Solal,et al.  Study of muscular and ventricular function in dynamic cardiomyoplasty: a ten-year follow-up. , 1997, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[12]  Contractile proteins of fatigue-resistant muscle. , 1991, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  C. Catani,et al.  Functional and Structural Characteristic of Sheep LD Conditioned to Fatigue Resistance by a Half-Day Cardiac-Like Electrostimulation Protocol: Implications for Dynamic Cardiomyoplasty , 1995 .

[14]  H. Halperin,et al.  Reverse remodeling from cardiomyoplasty in human heart failure. External constraint versus active assist. , 1995, Circulation.

[15]  A. Carpentier,et al.  MYOCARDIAL SUBSTITUTION WITH A STIMULATED SKELETAL MUSCLE: FIRST SUCCESSFUL CLINICAL CASE , 1985, The Lancet.

[16]  S. Salmons.  Exercise, Stimulation and Type Transformation of Skeletal Muscle , 1994, International journal of sports medicine.