Perceptual Dimensional Constraints in Response Selection Processes

Most processing stages theorists assume that response selection processes are largely autonomous from earlier perceptual analysis of information. We report findings that challenge this assumption and suggest that a much more complex interaction exists between perception and action. Specifically our study demonstrates that the initial analysis of visual objects into features from different dimensions strongly constrains postperceptual processes of response selection. When a target that is associated with a response on the basis of one dimension is presented simultaneously with flankers that are associated with a response on the basis of another dimension, the response to the target is not affected by the identity of the flankers. These findings hold under a variety of conditions and appear to be specific to perceptual dimensions. When both target and flankers are associated with a response on the basis of the same dimension, the response to the target is affected by the identity of the flankers even when the target and flankers are perceptually dissimilar or belong to different semantic categories (digits and letters). We propose a model of response selection that can account for these findings. The model assumes that initial response selection processes for simple features are performed within dimensional modules and suggests a specific mediating role for spatial attention. We argue that this model is compatible with several other lines of research.

[1]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: errors in binding visual types with visual tokens. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  E. Jaensch GRUNDFORMEN MENSCHLICHEN SEINS , 1931 .

[3]  R. Rafal,et al.  Attention and Feature Integration: Illusory Conjunctions in a Patient with a Parietal Lobe Lesion , 1991 .

[4]  D. Hubel,et al.  Ferrier lecture - Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Properties, Parts, and Objects , 1986 .

[6]  H Pashler,et al.  Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays , 1972 .

[8]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[9]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  I. Rock,et al.  Perceptual organization and attention , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  G R Grice,et al.  Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  G. Grice,et al.  Temporal characteristics of noise conditions producing facilitation and interference , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  S. Sternberg,et al.  The meaning of additive reaction-time effects: tests of three alternatives , 1993 .

[14]  N Kanwisher,et al.  Repetition blindness: The effects of stimulus modality and spatial displacement , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[15]  H. Pashler Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[18]  E. Smith,et al.  Choice reaction time: an analysis of the major theoretical positions. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Training and Stroop-like interference: evidence for a continuum of automaticity. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  R. Ivry,et al.  Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  D. C. Van Essen,et al.  Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  J. H. Flowers,et al.  Priming effects in perceptual classification , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  C. Brunia,et al.  A psychophysiological investigation of the selection and the use of partial stimulus information in response choice. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  R W Proctor,et al.  Repeated-stimulus superiority and inferiority effects in the identification of letters and digits , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[27]  Charles W. Eriksen,et al.  Target redundancy in visual search: Do repetitions of the target within thedisplay impair processing? , 1979 .

[28]  J Miller,et al.  Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  N. Kanwisher Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation , 1987, Cognition.

[31]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 2004 .

[35]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  H Pashler,et al.  Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: distinct attentional mechanisms. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[38]  S Yantis,et al.  Dividing attention between color and shape: Evidence of coactivation , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  A. Cohen,et al.  Orientation asymmetry in the flanker task , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  E. Donchin,et al.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[41]  L Harms,et al.  Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: theoretical distinctions and empirical results. , 1988, Acta psychologica.

[43]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  A. Kramer,et al.  Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  S W Keele,et al.  Tests of a temporal theory of attentional binding. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  A. Welford THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .

[48]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[49]  James L. McClelland On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[50]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[51]  A Cohen Asymmetries in visual search for conjunctive targets. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  Y Y Yeh,et al.  Name codes and features in the discrimination of letter forms , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  Jeff F. Miller The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[56]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Limitations on the Parallel Guidance of Visual Search : Color x Color and Orientation x Orientation Conjuctions , 2004 .

[57]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Curvature is a Basic Feature for Visual Search Tasks , 1992, Perception.

[58]  W Prinzmetal,et al.  Principles of feature integration in visual perception , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[59]  D. Jameson,et al.  An opponent-process theory of color vision. , 1957, Psychological review.

[60]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  J H Flowers,et al.  The effect of flanking context on visual classification: The joint contribution of interactions at different processing levels , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[62]  S. Yantis Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture , 1993 .

[63]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[64]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[65]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[66]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[67]  D. Hubel,et al.  Anatomy and physiology of a color system in the primate visual cortex , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[68]  A Cohen,et al.  Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[69]  R. Rafal,et al.  Visual Extinction and Stimulus Repetition , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[70]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Spatial Repetition Blindness Is Modulated by Selective Attention to Color or Shape , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[71]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[72]  J. Theeuwes Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[73]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[74]  David LaBerge,et al.  Automatic Semantic Processing of Unattended Words. , 1979 .

[75]  H Pashler,et al.  Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[76]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Effect of line orientation on various information-processing tasks. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.