Challenges in Microfluidic and Point-of-Care Phenotypic Antimicrobial Resistance Tests

To combat the threat to public health of antimicrobial resistance, there is a need for faster, more portable diagnostic tools to aid in antibiotic selection. Current methods for determining antimicrobial resistance of pathogens in clinical samples take days to result and require high levels of user input. Microfluidics offers many potential benefits, reducing time to result, user input, and allowing point of care testing. This review focuses on the challenges of developing functional or phenotypic microfluidic antimicrobial susceptibility tests; such methods complement other vital tools such as nucleic acid detection. Some of the most important challenges identified here are not unique to microfluidics but apply to most antimicrobial susceptibility testing innovations and relate to the nature of the sample being tested. For many high priority samples, mixtures of bacteria, highly variable target cell density, and the sample matrix can all affect measurements, and miniaturization can create sensitivity problems if target bacteria are dilute. Recent advances including smartphone capability, new sensors, microscopy, and a resurgence in paper microfluidics offer important opportunities for microfluidic engineering to simplify functional and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing. But the complexity of most clinical samples remains one of the biggest barriers to rapid uptake of microfluidics for antimicrobial resistance testing.

[1]  R. Ismagilov,et al.  Detecting bacteria and determining their susceptibility to antibiotics by stochastic confinement in nanoliter droplets using plug-based microfluidics. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[2]  Q. Wei,et al.  Smartphone‐based clinical diagnostics: towards democratization of evidence‐based health care , 2018, Journal of internal medicine.

[3]  M. Cooper,et al.  Effects of Microplate Type and Broth Additives on Microdilution MIC Susceptibility Assays , 2018, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[4]  Shenqi Wang,et al.  Bacterial biosensing: Recent advances in phage-based bioassays and biosensors. , 2018, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[5]  H. Hedlin,et al.  Contamination in Adult Midstream Clean-Catch Urine Cultures in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2019, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[6]  Thomas F. Krauss,et al.  Multiparameter antibiotic resistance detection based on hydrodynamic trapping of individual E. coli. , 2019, Lab on a chip.

[7]  Moran Bercovici,et al.  Rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing using nanoliter arrays , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  K. Kotz,et al.  Acoustic separation in plastic microfluidics for rapid detection of bacteria in blood using engineered bacteriophage. , 2018, Lab on a chip.

[9]  C. Solano,et al.  Polymicrobial infections: Do bacteria behave differently depending on their neighbours? , 2018, Virulence.

[10]  A. Sauer-Budge,et al.  Rapid phenotypic stress-based microfluidic antibiotic susceptibility testing of Gram-negative clinical isolates , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[11]  R. Rappuoli,et al.  Changing Priorities in Vaccinology: Antibiotic Resistance Moving to the Top , 2018, Front. Immunol..

[12]  Manal J. Natto,et al.  Validation of novel fluorescence assays for the routine screening of drug susceptibilities of Trichomonas vaginalis. , 2012, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[13]  Stefano Cestellos-Blanco,et al.  Miniaturized Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test by Combining Concentration Gradient Generation and Rapid Cell Culturing , 2015, Antibiotics.

[14]  John Turnidge,et al.  Setting and Revising Antibacterial Susceptibility Breakpoints , 2007, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[15]  Nuno M Reis,et al.  Lab on a stick: multi-analyte cellular assays in a microfluidic dipstick. , 2016, Lab on a chip.

[16]  A. K. Mambatta,et al.  Reliability of dipstick assay in predicting urinary tract infection , 2015, Journal of family medicine and primary care.

[17]  J. Guarro,et al.  Interlaboratory Variability of Caspofungin MICs for Candida spp. Using CLSI and EUCAST Methods: Should the Clinical Laboratory Be Testing This Agent? , 2013, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[18]  Lin Li,et al.  A smartphone controlled handheld microfluidic liquid handling system. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[19]  D. Kimmer,et al.  Resazurin assay for assessment of antimicrobial properties of electrospun nanofiber filtration membranes , 2019, AMB Express.

[20]  M. Kostrzewa,et al.  Rapid Direct Susceptibility Testing from Positive Blood Cultures by the Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry-Based Direct-on-Target Microdroplet Growth Assay , 2018, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[21]  V. Siersma,et al.  Effect of point-of-care susceptibility testing in general practice on appropriate prescription of antibiotics for patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infection: a diagnostic randomised controlled trial , 2017, BMJ Open.

[22]  Charles S Henry,et al.  Utilizing Paper-Based Devices for Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria Detection. , 2017, Angewandte Chemie.

[23]  Yuksel Temiz,et al.  Electrogates for stop-and-go control of liquid flow in microfluidics , 2018 .

[24]  P. Garstecki,et al.  Gravity-driven microfluidic assay for digital enumeration of bacteria and for antibiotic susceptibility testing. , 2019, Lab on a chip.

[25]  Wenjing Kang,et al.  Ultrafast Parallelized Microfluidic Platform for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram Positive and Negative Bacteria. , 2019, Analytical chemistry.

[26]  A. Lewis,et al.  Gram-Positive Uropathogens, Polymicrobial Urinary Tract Infection, and the Emerging Microbiota of the Urinary Tract , 2016, Microbiology spectrum.

[27]  J. Kirby,et al.  The Inoculum Effect in the Era of Multidrug Resistance: Minor Differences in Inoculum Have Dramatic Effect on MIC Determination , 2018, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[28]  Sarah H Needs,et al.  Exploiting open source 3D printer architecture for laboratory robotics to automate high-throughput time-lapse imaging for analytical microbiology , 2019, PloS one.

[29]  P. Garstecki,et al.  Microfluidic screening of antibiotic susceptibility at a single-cell level shows the inoculum effect of cefotaxime on E. coli. , 2018, Lab on a chip.

[30]  J. Cooper,et al.  Gradient Microfluidics Enables Rapid Bacterial Growth Inhibition Testing , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[31]  T. Smieszek,et al.  Potential for reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in English primary care , 2018, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[32]  N. Reis,et al.  Microfluidic smartphone quantitation of Escherichia coli in synthetic urine. , 2019, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[33]  K. Hood,et al.  Point-of-care urine culture for managing urinary tract infection in primary care: a randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness. , 2018, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[34]  Kangning Ren,et al.  Reliable and reusable whole polypropylene plastic microfluidic devices for a rapid, low-cost antimicrobial susceptibility test. , 2019, Lab on a chip.

[35]  M. Parameswaran,et al.  Resazurin reduction based colorimetric antibiogram in microfluidic plastic chip , 2013 .

[36]  Michael L Wilson,et al.  Laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infections in adult patients. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[37]  Marc Mendelson,et al.  The World Health Organization Global Action Plan for antimicrobial resistance. , 2015, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[38]  Sunghoon Kwon,et al.  Rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing by tracking single cell growth in a microfluidic agarose channel system. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[39]  R. Wallace,,et al.  Multisite Reproducibility of the Broth Microdilution Method for Susceptibility Testing of Nocardia Species , 2012, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[40]  N. López-Villalobos,et al.  The Effect of Urine Concentration and pH on the Growth of Escherichia Coli in Canine Urine In Vitro , 2018, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[41]  Fei Li,et al.  Advances in paper-based point-of-care diagnostics. , 2014, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[42]  E. Hade,et al.  Prediction of Antibiotic Susceptibility for Urinary Tract Infection in a Hospital Setting , 2020, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[43]  Maribel E Funes-Huacca,et al.  Antimicrobial susceptibility assays in paper-based portable culture devices. , 2014, Lab on a chip.

[44]  Vincent Gau,et al.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing using high surface-to-volume ratio microchannels. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[45]  Kuangwen Hsieh,et al.  Simple and Precise Counting of Viable Bacteria by Resazurin-Amplified Picoarray Detection. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[46]  Mel S. Lee,et al.  An integrated microfluidic system for antimicrobial susceptibility testing with antibiotic combination. , 2019, Lab on a chip.

[47]  C. Kuo,et al.  Association between urine pH and common uropathogens in children with urinary tract infections. , 2019, Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi.

[48]  Morteza Azizi,et al.  Nanoliter-Sized Microchamber/Microarray Microfluidic Platform for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[49]  David Juncker,et al.  Microfluidic Capillaric Circuit for Rapid and Facile Bacteria Detection. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[50]  O. Cars,et al.  A Novel Microfluidic Assay for Rapid Phenotypic Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria Detected in Clinical Blood Cultures , 2016, PloS one.

[51]  P. Dunlop,et al.  Resazurin-based 96-well plate microdilution method for the determination of minimum inhibitory concentration of biosurfactants , 2016, Biotechnology Letters.

[52]  B. Zimmer,et al.  Direct-from-Blood-Culture Disk Diffusion To Determine Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Bacteria: Preliminary Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods Development and Standardization Working Group , 2018, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[53]  Bhaskar K Somani,et al.  Laser-patterned paper-based sensors for rapid point-of-care detection and antibiotic-resistance testing of bacterial infections. , 2020, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[54]  Yuksel Temiz,et al.  Sub-nanoliter, real-time flow monitoring in microfluidic chips using a portable device and smartphone , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[55]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Diagnostics for the developing world: microfluidic paper-based analytical devices. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[56]  Gilbert GREUB,et al.  Microbial diagnosis of bloodstream infection: towards molecular diagnosis directly from blood. , 2015, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[57]  L. Yamamoto,et al.  Assessment and comparison of bacterial load levels determined by quantitative amplifications in blood culture-positive and negative neonatal sepsis , 2018, Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo.

[58]  Li Shen,et al.  Point-of-care colorimetric detection with a smartphone. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[59]  Nate J. Cira,et al.  A self-loading microfluidic device for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of antibiotics. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[60]  E. Bouza,et al.  Is the Volume of Blood Cultured Still a Significant Factor in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections? , 2007, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[61]  M. Singer,et al.  Impact of time to antibiotic therapy on clinical outcome in patients with bacterial infections in the emergency department: implications for antimicrobial stewardship. , 2020, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[62]  Sebastian Wachsmann-Hogiu,et al.  Dual-phone illumination-imaging system for high resolution and large field of view multi-modal microscopy. , 2019, Lab on a chip.

[63]  C. Bethel,et al.  Use of the Accelerate Pheno System for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Pathogens in Positive Blood Cultures and Impact on Time to Results and Workflow , 2017, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[64]  L. Guardabassi,et al.  Optimization and evaluation of Flexicult® Vet for detection, identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial uropathogens in small animal veterinary practice , 2015, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[65]  A. Dietzel,et al.  Cross-Flow Filtration of Escherichia coli at a Nanofluidic Gap for Fast Immobilization and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing , 2019, Micromachines.

[66]  Alexis Boucharin,et al.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing in less than 30 min using direct single-cell imaging , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  M. Kutateladze,et al.  Bacteriophages as potential new therapeutics to replace or supplement antibiotics. , 2010, Trends in biotechnology.

[68]  Matt Kaeberlein,et al.  An inexpensive microscopy system for microfluidic studies in budding yeast , 2019, Translational medicine of aging.

[69]  Lane E. Breshears,et al.  Smartphone-Based Paper Microfluidic Particulometry of Norovirus from Environmental Water Samples at the Single Copy Level , 2019, ACS omega.