Mobile technology in mobile work: contradictions and congruencies in activity systems

Mobile technology and the information and communication services supported by it have become increasingly embedded in, and in some cases transformed, work and social activity and created new challenges for studying information systems. This paper focuses on the experience with mobile technology in an inherently mobile and information-intensive work activity – policing. Drawing upon data from this context this paper makes two key sets of contributions. Empirically, we illuminate the congruencies and contradictions between mobile technology and mobile working, and the relationship between the two, revealing a state of change based upon dialectic interaction. We highlight several ways in which mobile technology has changed the nature of mobile work activity. Theoretically we advance the use of activity theory to better understand the changes of mobile technology-mediated work. We extend traditional use of activity theory by adopting congruencies as an analytical lens, in addition to the approach of examining contradictions. The findings are applicable to other areas of mobile work and contribute to the body of knowledge concerning mobile technology-mediated work.

[1]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Scholarship and practice: the contribution of ethnographic research methods to bridging the gap , 1994, Business Process Re-Engineering.

[2]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization , 2001 .

[3]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Jin Chen,et al.  E-government adoption in public administration organizations: integrating institutional theory perspective and resource-based view , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  Innovation in UK Law Enforcement: The Emergence of Mobile Data , 2009, AMCIS.

[6]  David Nicholas.  The Times They Are a-Changin’ (again!): the second, great digital transition to the mobile space , 2013 .

[7]  Craig Paterson,et al.  Handbook of Policing (2Nd Edition) , 2009 .

[8]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  Habits make smartphone use more pervasive , 2011, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[9]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[10]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  Information sharing and interoperability: the case of major incident management , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Activity Theory and the Social Construction of Knowledge: A Story of Four Umpires , 2000 .

[12]  Niall Hayes,et al.  Hybridity, consulting and e-development in the making: inscribing new practices of impact assessment and value management , 2013, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[13]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[14]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  Critical Factors and Patterns in the Innovation Process , 2011 .

[15]  Carsten Sørensen,et al.  Tales from the police: Rhythms of interaction with mobile technologies , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[16]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[17]  Dan Shapiro,et al.  New Technology and Practical Police Work: The Social Context of Technical Innovation , 1992 .

[18]  Jan Kietzmann,et al.  Interactive innovation of technology for mobile work , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Wendy L. Cukier,et al.  Is mobile email functional or dysfunctional? Two perspectives on mobile email usage , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  E. Clemons,et al.  Newly vulnerable markets in an age of pure information products: an analysis of online music and online news , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[21]  Ingoo Han,et al.  What drives the adoption of mobile data services? An approach from a value perspective , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Material Works: Exploring the Situated Entanglement of Technological Performativity and Human Agency , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[24]  Elizabeth Murphy,et al.  Contradictions between the virtual and physical high school classroom: A third-generation Activity Theory perspective , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[25]  Jonas Hedman,et al.  Time‐out/time‐in: the dynamics of everyday experiential computing devices , 2014, Inf. Syst. J..

[26]  Y. Engeström.  Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. , 2001 .

[27]  Harry Bouwman,et al.  Coppers context, and conjoints: a reassessment of TAM , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[28]  Carsten Sørensen,et al.  The dynamics of control and mobile computing in distributed activities , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Clay Spinuzzi.  Network: Theorizing Knowledge Work in Telecommunications , 2008 .

[30]  Bongsug Chae,et al.  The surface of emergence in systems development: agency, institutions, and large-scale information systems , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[32]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  M. Lynn.  Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1996 .

[34]  Tim Newburn,et al.  Handbook of policing , 2003 .

[35]  Joseph G. Davis,et al.  Activity theory as a theoretical foundation for information systems research , 2000, IRMA Conference.

[36]  Nick Peim,et al.  Activity theory and ontology , 2009 .

[37]  Leyland F. Pitt,et al.  Mobility at Work - A Typology of Mobile Communities of Practice and Contextual Ambidexterity , 2013, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[39]  Robert D. Austin,et al.  Creative, convergent, and social: Prospects for mobile computing , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[40]  Rahul C. Basole.  Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem , 2008, 2008 7th International Conference on Mobile Business.

[41]  Gamel O. Wiredu.  User appropriation of mobile technologies: Motives, conditions and design properties , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[42]  Richard Levins,et al.  Dialectics and Systems Theory , 2008 .

[43]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[44]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Ėvalʹd Vasilʹevich Ilʹenkov,et al.  Dialectical logic : essays on its history and theory , 1977 .

[46]  Iris A. Junglas,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on mobile user behaviour , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[47]  N. McBride,et al.  Actor-network theory and the adoption of mobile communications. , 2003 .

[48]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Contextual influences on user satisfaction with mobile computing: findings from two healthcare organizations , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Peter K. Manning,et al.  Information Technology in the Police Context: The "Sailor" Phone , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Adoption of Mobile Devices/Services — Searching for Answers with the UTAUT , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[51]  Jonathan Donner,et al.  The Rules of Beeping: Exchanging Messages Via Intentional "Missed Calls" on Mobile Phones , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[52]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Examining Trust in Information Technology Artifacts: The Effects of System Quality and Culture , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[54]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Action, interaction and the role of ambiguity in the introduction of mobile information systems in a UK Police Force , 2004, MOBIS.

[55]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  ICT for development in the context of the closure of Chernobyl nuclear power plant: an activity theory perspective , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[56]  Yoonhyuk Jung,et al.  What a smartphone is to me: understanding user values in using smartphones , 2014, Inf. Syst. J..

[57]  R. Miettinen,et al.  The riddle of things: Activity theory and actor‐network theory as approaches to studying innovations , 1999 .

[58]  K AllenDavid,et al.  How should technology-mediated organizational change be explained? a comparison of the contributions of critical realism and activity theory , 2013 .

[59]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[60]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[61]  A. Stinchcombe.  Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[62]  D. Ezzy.  Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation , 2002 .

[63]  G. Walsham.  Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 1997 .

[64]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Task-technology fit for mobile information systems , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[65]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  How Is the Mobile Internet Different? Search Costs and Local Activities , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[66]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Mobility and the first responder , 2004, CACM.

[67]  Mark A. Spasser.  Realist Activity Theory for Digital Library Evaluation: Conceptual Framework and Case Study , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[68]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[69]  Linda Duxbury,et al.  The “Myth of Separate Worlds”: An Exploration of How Mobile Technology has Redefined Work-Life Balance , 2011 .

[70]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  Organizational impacts of new communication technology: a comparison of cellular phone adoption in France and the United States , 1999 .

[71]  Robert B. Johnston,et al.  An empirical evaluation of existing IS change theories for the case of IOIS evolution , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[72]  Samuel Nunn,et al.  Police Information Technology: Assessing the Effects of Computerization on Urban Police Functions , 2001 .

[73]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Communication, discourse and activity , 1999 .

[74]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[75]  Neelam Srivastava.  Challenges of Next-Generation Wireless Sensor Networks and its impact on Society , 2010, ArXiv.