Biofuels are often presented as an environmentally friendly alternative to fossil fuels; however, empirical analysis that is widely reported in the literature shows that biofuel production can have negative environmental and social impacts. The potential for these negative impacts can be avoided through careful planning of biofuel feedstock production and processing. This report focuses on how green technologies and practices can be introduced into ethanol production to reduce its environmental footprint. The research site of this study is located in Khon Kaen province in northeastern Thailand. Emissions from ethanol production were estimated using life cycle greenhouse gas emission analysis. The analysis covered land use change, cultivation of cassava and sugarcane, ethanol processing, and transportation. Farming data from the study sites in 2013 was used to estimate emissions from crop cultivation and the transportation of cassava and sugarcane to the ethanol plants. Emissions from ethanol production processing were estimated from production data from a combined sugar milling and molasses ethanol factory and a cassava flour and ethanol factory. The estimated emissions from sugarcane farming (32 g CO2eq/MJ ethanol) were much higher than for cassava farming (5 g CO2eq/MJ ethanol) due to greater application of chemical fertilizer and burning during harvesting. The research estimated that the application of green agricultural technologies for sugarcane farming –non-burning, drainage management in irrigated areas, reduced use of chemical fertilizer, and increased use of green compost – would reduce emissions per year by 17 g CO2eq/MJ ethanol. The ethanol production from cassava generated high emissions from the burning of coal in the internal boilers of the ethanol production processing plant (56 g CO2eq/MJ ethanol). Utilisation of the waste to generate electricity and biogas would reduce emissions by 14 -26 g CO2eq/MJ ethanol per year by reducing dependence on coal and conventional sources of electricity. The research concluded that the green technologies and practices studied could contribute to both lower GHG emissions and better environmental outcomes from biofuel production.
[1]
Benchaphun Ekasingh,et al.
Competitive Commercial Agriculture in the Northeast of Thailand
,
2007
.
[2]
P. Chaiprasert,et al.
Biogas Production from Agricultural Wastes in Thailand
,
2011
.
[3]
Boonrod Sajjakulnukit,et al.
Energy and greenhouse gas emissions reduction potential of sugarcane field residues power generation in Thailand.
,
2013
.
[4]
Robin Bourgeois.
Biomass, renewable energy and rural poverty.
,
2005
.
[5]
Pomthong Malakul,et al.
Life-cycle energy and environmental analysis of bioethanol production from cassava in Thailand.
,
2010,
Bioresource technology.
[6]
Mirko Barz,et al.
Agricultural Residues as Promising Biofuels for Biomass Power Generation in Thailand
,
2011
.
[7]
W. Siemers,et al.
Greenhouse Gas Balance for Electricity Production from Biomass Resources in Thailand
,
2010
.
[8]
S. Herath,et al.
Impact assessment of climate change on rice production in Khon Kaen province, Thailand.
,
2011
.
[9]
Chantana Yuvaniyama,et al.
Overview of Biomass Utilization in Thailand
,
2004
.
[10]
Thapat Silalertruksa,et al.
Environmental sustainability assessment of bio-ethanol production in Thailand
,
2009
.
[11]
Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.
Land use and land cover
,
2002
.
[12]
David Wood.
The Future of Biofuels in Thailand
,
2006
.