The effects of glaucoma on the latency of the multifocal visual evoked potential

Aims: To determine the effect of glaucomatous damage on the latency of the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP). Methods: Monocular mfVEPs were recorded from a glaucoma group (n = 50) defined by a glaucomatous disc and an abnormal visual field and a control group (n = 47). 25 patients were characterised as normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and 25 as high tension glaucoma (HTG). Monocular and interocular latency analyses of the more affected eye were obtained using custom software. Results: On interocular analysis, both the HTG and NTG groups showed a statistically significant increase in mean mfVEP latency with average relative latencies and percentage of points with significant delays of 1.7 ms and 10.3% (HTG) and 1.3 ms and 8.2% (NTG) compared to −0.3 ms and 2.7% (controls). On monocular analysis, only the HTG group showed a significant increase in latency with measures of 5.7 ms and 14.6% (HTG) compared to 3.2 ms and 10.6% (NTG) and 2.1 ms and 9.6% (controls). Using the 95th percentile of a normative group as the cut off, the sensitivity ranged from 20% to 38% and the specificity from 87% to 100% with the interocular analysis providing the best discrimination, Conclusion: Although up to 40% of patients showed delays in the mfVEP latency, these delays were modest, on average a few milliseconds. These results differ markedly from those of a recent conventional VEP study, which reported 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and an average delay that exceeded 25 ms.

[1]  S. Miglior,et al.  Clinical ability of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in detecting visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[2]  Ivan Goldberg,et al.  Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: a monocular analysis , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[4]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  Determining abnormal interocular latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[5]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[6]  Nitin Ohri,et al.  Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  Robert Ritch,et al.  Multifocal visual evoked potential responses in glaucoma patients with unilateral hemifield defects. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  R. Rejdak,et al.  Oral citicoline treatment improves visual pathway function in glaucoma. , 2003, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[9]  Donald C Hood,et al.  Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma , 2003, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[10]  V. Greenstein,et al.  Multifocal VEP Responses in Glaucoma Patients With Unilateral Hemifield Defects , 2002 .

[11]  S. Graham,et al.  Multifocal VEP latency in Glaucoma , 2002 .

[12]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: an objective definition for poor records , 2002, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[13]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording , 2002, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[14]  H. Abe,et al.  Mapping of glaucomatous visual field defects by multifocal VEPs. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  V. Parisi Impaired visual function in glaucoma , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  S Kangovi,et al.  An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  H. Quigley,et al.  Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  S L Graham,et al.  Objective VEP Perimetry in Glaucoma: Asymmetry Analysis to Identify Early Deficits , 2000, Journal of glaucoma.

[19]  S. Graham,et al.  Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  V. Parisi Neural conduction in the visual pathways in ocular hypertension and glaucoma , 1997, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[21]  G. Dunkelberger,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  I. Bodis-Wollner,et al.  Flicker threshold and pattern VEP latency in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  B. Schwartz,et al.  The visual evoked potential in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: effects of check size, field size, and stimulation rate. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  S. Graham,et al.  Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  S. Klein,et al.  The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.