Interrelationship of trabecular mechanical and microstructural properties in sheep trabecular bone.

The ability to evaluate fracture risk at an early time point is essential for improved prognostics as well as enhanced treatment in cases of bone loss such as from osteoporosis. Improving the diagnostic ability is inherent upon both high-resolution non-invasive imaging, and a thorough understanding of how the derived indices of structure and density relate to its true mechanical behavior. Using sheep femoral trabecular bone with a range of strength, the interrelationship of mechanical and microstructural parameters was analyzed using multi-directional mechanical testing and micro-computed tomography. Forty-five cubic trabecular bone samples were harvested from 23 adult female sheep, some of whom had received hind-limb vibratory stimuli over the course of 2 years with consequently enhanced mechanical properties. These samples were pooled into a low, medium, or high strength group for further analysis. The findings show that microCT indices that are structural in nature, e.g., structural model index (SMI) (r2=0.85, p<0.0001) is as good as more density oriented indices like bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) (r2=0.81, p<0.0001) in predicting the ultimate strength of a region of trabecular bone. Additionally, those indices more related to global changes in trabecular structure such as connectivity density (ConnD) or degree of anisotropy (DA) are less able to predict the mechanical properties of bone. Interrelationships of trabecular indices such as trabecular number (TbN), thickness (TbTh), and spacing (TbSp) provide clues as to how the trabecular bone will remodel to ultimately achieve differences in the apparent mechanical properties. For instance, the analysis showed that a loss of bone primarily affects the connectedness and overall number of trabeculae, while increased strength results in an increase of the overall thickness of trabeculae while not improving the connectedness. Certainly, the microCT indices studied are able to predict the bulk mechanical properties of a trabecular ROI well, leaving unaccounted only about 15-20% of its inherent variability. Diagnostically, this implies that future work on the early prediction of fracture risk should continue to explore the role of bone quality as the key factors or as an adjuvant to bone quantity (e.g., apparent density).

[1]  R Müller,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of nonhuman primate trabecular architecture using micro-computed tomography. , 2001, American journal of physical anthropology.

[2]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Combination of topological parameters and bone volume fraction better predicts the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  J. Warner,et al.  Selective capsular shift technique for anterior and anterior-inferior glenohumeral instability. , 2000, Clinics in sports medicine.

[4]  D. Shelton,et al.  Radiologic bone assessment in the evaluation of osteoporosis. , 2002, American family physician.

[5]  Susan R. Johnson,et al.  Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. , 2001, JAMA.

[6]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Noninvasive Assessment of Trabecular Bone Architecture and the Competence of Bone , 2012, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.

[7]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Elastic properties of cancellous bone: measurement by an ultrasonic technique. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  R B Ashman,et al.  Anatomical variation of orthotropic elastic moduli of the proximal human tibia. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  G. Niebur,et al.  Biomechanics of trabecular bone. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[10]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A new method for the model‐independent assessment of thickness in three‐dimensional images , 1997 .

[11]  W C Van Buskirk,et al.  A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  F Eckstein,et al.  The osteoporotic vertebral structure is well adapted to the loads of daily life, but not to infrequent "error" loads. , 2004, Bone.

[13]  S. Majumdar,et al.  3 How can we measure bone quality , 1997 .

[14]  C. Sanborn,et al.  Bone health and osteoporosis. , 2000, Clinics in sports medicine.

[15]  S C Cowin,et al.  The bone tissue of the canine mandible is elastically isotropic. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Stefan Judex,et al.  Combining high-resolution micro-computed tomography with material composition to define the quality of bone tissue , 2003, Current osteoporosis reports.

[17]  S. Papapoulos,et al.  A New Approach to the Development of Assessment Guidelines for Osteoporosis , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[18]  Harold C. Sox,et al.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Geriatric Assessment Methods for Clinical Decision‐making , 1988 .

[19]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  The dependence of the elastic properties of osteoporotic cancellous bone on volume fraction and fabric. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  K. Faulkner Update on bone density measurement. , 2001, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[21]  C. Cooper,et al.  Epidemiology of osteoporosis. , 2001, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[22]  M. R. Davidson,et al.  Pharmacotherapeutics for osteoporosis prevention and treatment. , 2003, Journal of midwifery & women's health.

[23]  H K Genant,et al.  Advanced imaging of bone macro and micro structure. , 1999, Bone.

[24]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Evaluation of trabecular bone orientation in wrists of young volunteers using MR relaxometry and high resolution MRI. , 2001, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[25]  James Laney Williams,et al.  Assessment of bone quantity and 'quality' by ultrasound attenuation and velocity in the heel. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[26]  C. Rubin,et al.  Quantity and Quality of Trabecular Bone in the Femur Are Enhanced by a Strongly Anabolic, Noninvasive Mechanical Intervention , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Direct Three‐Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of Human Cancellous Bone: Microstructural Data from Spine, Femur, Iliac Crest, and Calcaneus , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[28]  TOR Hildebrand,et al.  Quantification of Bone Microarchitecture with the Structure Model Index. , 1997, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.