Validation of 14 used, re-calibrated and new TSI 3790 condensation particle counters according to the UN-ECE Regulation 83

Abstract Four new, four re-calibrated and six used TSI 3790 condensation particle counters (CPC) were checked using soot particles produced by a mini CAST generator. One of the re-calibrated CPC was also checked with Emery oil (PAO 4) particles (evaporation-condensation method) and its counting efficiencies were in agreement with the manufacturer’s calibration data which were determined with Emery oil particles (electrospray method). However, the counting efficiencies with the soot particles were lower indicating the importance of the calibration material (chemical composition, morphology). Since UN-ECE regulation 83 for light duty vehicles does not specify the material to be used, the validation (check) should be conducted with the same material used by the manufacturer or the differences between the materials should be taken into account. Two used CPCs showed a ∼20% decrease in their counting efficiencies after 1.5 years of measuring engine exhaust aerosol. This drift could not be recognized by the status indicators of the instrument and could be attributed to a degradation of the CPC saturator (wick). Two CPCs also showed a non-linear response; a 7% difference was found between low (10 cm −3 ) and high concentrations (10,000 cm −3 ). A non-linear response (up to 40%) was also observed when the temperature difference between the saturator and the condenser was increased to decrease the cut-off size of the CPCs.

[1]  E. Torres,et al.  Carbonyl compounds emitted by a diesel engine fuelled with diesel and biodiesel–diesel blends: Sampling optimization and emissions profile , 2008 .

[2]  A. Wiedensohler,et al.  An approximation of the bipolar charge distribution for particles in the submicron size range , 1988 .

[3]  Jon Andersson,et al.  Particle Measurement Programme (PMP) Light-Duty Inter-Laboratory Exercise: Repeatability and Reproducibility of the Particle Number Method , 2008 .

[4]  Jörg Meyer,et al.  Filtration Efficiency of Aerosol Particles Below 20 Nanometers , 2005 .

[5]  B. Giechaskiel,et al.  A note on the comparison of particle number counters , 2009 .

[6]  Robert Caldow,et al.  Evaluation of a condensation particle counter for vehicle emission measurement: Experimental procedure and effects of calibration aerosol material , 2010 .

[7]  Q. Wei,et al.  Real-Time Measuring System for Engine Exhaust Solid Particle Number Emission - Performance and Vehicle Tests , 2006 .

[8]  Klaus Willeke,et al.  Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications , 2001 .

[9]  Barouch Giechaskiel,et al.  Calibration and Validation of Various Commercial Particle Number Measurement Systems , 2009 .

[10]  M. Stolzenburg,et al.  A Method for Particle Size Amplification by Water Condensation in a Laminar, Thermally Diffusive Flow , 2005 .

[11]  F. Schröder,et al.  The Particle Detection Efficiency Curve of the TSI-3010 CPC as a Function of the Temperature Difference between Saturator and Condenser , 1995 .

[12]  Jon Andersson,et al.  Particle measurement programme (PMP) light-duty inter-laboratory exercise: comparison of different particle number measurement systems , 2008 .

[13]  G. Mulholland,et al.  Calibration of a Condensation Particle Counter Using a NIST Traceable Method , 2009 .

[14]  J. Hudson,et al.  Intercomparison Study of the Size-Dependent Counting Efficiency of 26 Condensation Particle Counters , 1997 .

[15]  Barouch Giechaskiel,et al.  Calibration of Condensation Particle Counters for Legislated Vehicle Number Emission Measurements , 2009 .

[16]  Alexander Bergmann,et al.  Calibration and accuracy of a particle number measurement system , 2010 .