Noninvasive image analysis of 3D construct mineralization in a perfusion bioreactor.

Although the beneficial effects of perfusion on cell-mediated mineralization have been demonstrated in several studies, the size of the mineralized constructs produced has been limited. The ability to quantify mineralized matrix formation non-invasively within 3D constructs would benefit efforts to optimize bioreactor conditions for scaling-up constructs to clinically relevant dimensions. In this study, we report a micro-CT imaging-based technique to monitor 3D mineralization over time in a perfusion bioreactor and specifically assess mechanisms of construct mineralization by quantifying the number, size, and distribution of mineralized particle formation within constructs varying in thickness from 3 to 9 mm. As expected, mineralized matrix volume and particle number increased with construct thickness. Analyzing multiple concentric volumes inside each construct indicated that a greater proportion of the mineral volume was found within the interior of the perfused constructs. Interestingly, intermediate-sized 6mm thick constructs were found to have the highest core mineral volume fraction and the largest mineralized particles. Two complementary mechanisms of increasing total mineral volume were observed in the 6 and 9 mm constructs: increasing particle size and increasing the number of mineralized particles, respectively. The rate of mineralized matrix formation in the perfused constructs increased from 0.69 mm(3)/week during the first 3 weeks of culture to 1.03 mm(3)/week over the final 2 weeks. In contrast, the rate of mineral deposition in the static controls was 0.01 mm(3)/week during the first 3 weeks of culture and 0.16 mm(3)/week from week 3 to week 5. The ability to monitor overall construct mineralization non-invasively coupled with quantitative analysis of mineralized particle size, number, and distribution offers a powerful tool for elucidating how mineral growth mechanisms are affected by cell type, scaffold material and architecture, or bioreactor flow conditions.

[1]  Clemens A van Blitterswijk,et al.  A perfusion bioreactor system capable of producing clinically relevant volumes of tissue-engineered bone: in vivo bone formation showing proof of concept. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[2]  Robert E Guldberg,et al.  Effects of medium perfusion rate on cell-seeded three-dimensional bone constructs in vitro. , 2003, Tissue engineering.

[3]  Antonios G. Mikos,et al.  Mineralized matrix deposition by marrow stromal osteoblasts in 3D perfusion culture increases with increasing fluid shear forces , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  L. Bonewald,et al.  Von Kossa Staining Alone Is Not Sufficient to Confirm that Mineralization In Vitro Represents Bone Formation , 2003, Calcified Tissue International.

[5]  J. Aubin.  Osteoprogenitor cell frequency in rat bone marrow stromal populations: Role for heterotypic cell–cell interactions in osteoblast differentiation , 1999, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[6]  Swee Hin Teoh,et al.  Repair of calvarial defects with customised tissue-engineered bone grafts II. Evaluation of cellular efficiency and efficacy in vivo. , 2003, Tissue engineering.

[7]  S. Bruder,et al.  Tissue engineering of bone. Cell based strategies. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  D. Wendt,et al.  The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering. , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[9]  I Zein,et al.  Mechanical properties and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  Ivan Martin,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Perfusion Culture of Human Bone Marrow Cells and Generation of Osteoinductive Grafts , 2005, Stem cells.

[11]  M J Yaszemski,et al.  Bone formation by three-dimensional stromal osteoblast culture in biodegradable polymer scaffolds. , 1997, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.

[12]  J. Glowacki,et al.  Perfusion Enhances Functions of Bone Marrow Stromal Cells in Three-Dimensional Culture , 1998 .

[13]  Antonios G Mikos,et al.  Flow perfusion culture induces the osteoblastic differentiation of marrow stroma cell-scaffold constructs in the absence of dexamethasone. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[14]  B. Cole,et al.  Bone marrow and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in osseous repair. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  D. Brodke,et al.  Bone grafts prepared with selective cell retention technology heal canine segmental defects as effectively as autograft , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic,et al.  Bone Tissue Engineering Using Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Effects of Scaffold Material and Medium Flow , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Antonios G. Mikos,et al.  Fluid flow increases mineralized matrix deposition in 3D perfusion culture of marrow stromal osteoblasts in a dose-dependent manner , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Swee Hin Teoh,et al.  Cranioplasty after Trephination using a Novel Biodegradable Burr Hole Cover: Technical Case Report , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[19]  B. Baum,et al.  Synergy between genetic and tissue engineering: creating an artificial salivary gland. , 2006, Periodontology 2000.

[20]  Angela Lin,et al.  Quantitative microcomputed tomography analysis of mineralization within three-dimensional scaffolds in vitro. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[21]  E H Burger,et al.  Nitric oxide response to shear stress by human bone cell cultures is endothelial nitric oxide synthase dependent. , 1998, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[22]  T. Einhorn.  Clinically applied models of bone regeneration in tissue engineering research. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  J. Frangos,et al.  Fluid shear stress stimulates prostaglandin and nitric oxide release in bone marrow-derived preosteoclast-like cells. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[24]  A. Mikos,et al.  Effect of convection on osteoblastic cell growth and function in biodegradable polymer foam scaffolds. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[25]  B. A. Byers,et al.  Synergy between genetic and tissue engineering: Runx2 overexpression and in vitro construct development enhance in vivo mineralization. , 2004, Tissue engineering.

[26]  Roger Zauel,et al.  3-D computational modeling of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  J. Jansen,et al.  Tissue Engineering of Bone , 1997 .

[28]  M J Yaszemski,et al.  Three-dimensional culture of rat calvarial osteoblasts in porous biodegradable polymers. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[29]  G. B. Stark,et al.  Tissue engineering of bone , 2002, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[30]  B. A. Byers,et al.  Exogenous Runx2 expression enhances in vitro osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization in primary bone marrow stromal cells. , 2004, Tissue engineering.