Assessing the spatial relationship between fixation and foveal specializations

ABSTRACT Increased cone photoreceptor density, an avascular zone (FAZ), and the displacement of inner retinal neurons to form a pit are distinct features of the human fovea. As the fovea provides the majority of our vision, appreciating how these anatomical specializations are related is important for understanding foveal development, normal visual function, and retinal disease. Here we evaluated the relationship between these specializations and their location relative to the preferred retinal locus of fixation (PRL). We measured foveal pit volume, FAZ area, peak cone density, and location of the PRL in 22 subjects with normal vision using optical coherence tomography and adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy. Foveal pit volume was positively correlated with FAZ area; however, peak cone density was not correlated with pit volume. In addition, there was no systematic offset of the location of any of these specializations relative to PRL, and there was no correlation between the magnitude of the offset from PRL and the corresponding foveal specialization measurements (pit volume, FAZ area, peak cone density). The standard deviation of our PRL measurements was consistent with previous measurements of fixational stability. These data provide insight into the sequence of events during foveal development and may have implications for visual function and retinal disease.

[1]  Mette Owner-Petersen,et al.  Noninvasive imaging of human foveal capillary network using dual-conjugate adaptive optics. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The FFA shows a face inversion effect that is correlated with the behavioral face inversion effect , 2010 .

[3]  Alfredo Dubra,et al.  Registration of 2D Images from Fast Scanning Ophthalmic Instruments , 2010, WBIR.

[4]  David Williams,et al.  The locus of fixation and the foveal cone mosaic. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[5]  Stephen A. Burns,et al.  Foveal Avascular Zone and Its Relationship to Foveal Pit Shape , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  M. A. Goodale,et al.  What is the best fixation target? The effect of target shape on stability of fixational eye movements , 2013, Vision Research.

[7]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Astrocytes and blood vessels define the foveal rim during primate retinal development. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Organization of the Adult Primate Fovea , 2005 .

[10]  David Williams,et al.  Functional photoreceptor loss revealed with adaptive optics: an alternate cause of color blindness. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. Steinman.  Effect of Target Size, Luminance, and Color on Monocular Fixation* , 1965 .

[12]  Arthur Bradley,et al.  Psychophysical measurement of the size and shape of the human foveal avascular zone , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[13]  Austin Roorda,et al.  Disruption of the retinal parafoveal capillary network in type 2 diabetes before the onset of diabetic retinopathy. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  B. Dreher,et al.  Ontogeny of the primate fovea:a central issue in retinal development , 1998, Progress in Neurobiology.

[15]  Toco Y P Chui,et al.  The association between the foveal avascular zone and retinal thickness. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  M. Goldbaum,et al.  Foveal hypoplasia demonstrated in vivo with optical coherence tomography. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  Michael B. McCamy,et al.  The effects of fixation target size and luminance on microsaccades and square-wave jerks , 2013, PeerJ.

[18]  Ashavini M. Pavaskar,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation of rod photoreceptor reflectance in the human retina , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[19]  A D Springer,et al.  Development of the primate area of high acuity. 1. Use of finite element analysis models to identify mechanical variables affecting pit formation , 2004, Visual Neuroscience.

[20]  A. A. Skavenski,et al.  Miniature eye movement. , 1973, Science.

[21]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Gradients of cone differentiation and FGF expression during development of the foveal depression in macaque retina , 2005, Visual Neuroscience.

[22]  Alfredo Dubra,et al.  Relationship between the foveal avascular zone and foveal pit morphology. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  J. Sahel,et al.  Foveal shape and structure in a normal population. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  C. Curcio,et al.  Variability in Human Cone Topography Assessed by Adaptive Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy. , 2015, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  M. K. Walsh,et al.  Abnormal foveal avascular zone in nanophthalmos. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  Carol L Shields,et al.  CORRELATION OF FOVEAL AVASCULAR ZONE SIZE WITH FOVEAL MORPHOLOGY IN NORMAL EYES USING OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY , 2015, Retina.

[27]  Robert J Zawadzki,et al.  Visual insignificance of the foveal pit: reassessment of foveal hypoplasia as fovea plana. , 2008, Archives of ophthalmology.

[28]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[29]  Christopher S. Langlo,et al.  Repeatability of In Vivo Parafoveal Cone Density and Spacing Measurements , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[30]  P. Rosenfeld,et al.  Age-related macular degeneration: clinical findings, histopathology and imaging techniques. , 2014, Developments in ophthalmology.

[31]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Development of the neural retina and its vasculature in the marmoset Callithrix jacchus , 2006, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[32]  H. Barlow.  Eye movements during fixation , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  Kaccie Y. Li,et al.  Intersubject variability of foveal cone photoreceptor density in relation to eye length. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[34]  José Cunha-Vaz,et al.  Phenotypes and biomarkers of diabetic retinopathy , 2014, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[35]  William Fischer,et al.  Race- and sex-related differences in retinal thickness and foveal pit morphology. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[36]  Deborah M. Costakos,et al.  Relationship between foveal cone specialization and pit morphology in albinism. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[37]  G. Quinn,et al.  Outcome of prematurity and retinopathy of prematurity. , 1996, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[38]  Michael Unser,et al.  A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[39]  J. Provis,et al.  Gradients of Eph-A6 expression in primate retina suggest roles in both vascular and axon guidance , 2009, Molecular vision.

[40]  M. Yamada,et al.  PAX6 missense mutation in isolated foveal hypoplasia , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[41]  G. Spaeth,et al.  Aniridia. A review. , 1984, Survey of ophthalmology.

[42]  J. Provis,et al.  Differential expression of anti-angiogenic factors and guidance genes in the developing macula , 2009, Molecular vision.

[43]  Jingyun Wang,et al.  Foveal avascular zone and foveal pit formation after preterm birth , 2012, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[44]  Adam M. Dubis,et al.  Adaptation of the central retina for high acuity vision: Cones, the fovea and the avascular zone , 2013, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[45]  J. Provis,et al.  The cellular expression of antiangiogenic factors in fetal primate macula. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[46]  C. Summers.  Vision in albinism. , 1997, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.