Reconstruction of an average cortical column in silico

The characterization of individual neurons by Golgi and Cajal has been the basis of neuroanatomy for a century. A new challenge is to anatomically describe, at cellular resolution, complete local circuits that can drive behavior. In this essay, we review the possibilities to obtain a model cortical column by using in vitro and in vivo pair recordings, followed by anatomical reconstructions of the projecting and target cells. These pairs establish connection modules that eventually may be useful to synthesize an average cortical column in silico. Together with data on sensory evoked neuronal activity measured in vivo, this will allow to model the anatomical and functional cellular basis of behavior based on more realistic assumptions than previously attempted.

[1]  J. Hoover,et al.  Projections from primary somatosensory cortex to the neostriatum: the role of somatotopic continuity in corticostriatal convergence. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  V. Mountcastle.  Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex. , 1957, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Developmental Switch in the Short-Term Modification of Unitary EPSPs Evoked in Layer 2/3 and Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons of Rat Neocortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  R. Douglas,et al.  A Quantitative Map of the Circuit of Cat Primary Visual Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  W. Denk,et al.  Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy to Reconstruct Three-Dimensional Tissue Nanostructure , 2004, PLoS biology.

[6]  M. Glickstein,et al.  Whiskers, barrels, and cortical efferent pathways in gap crossing by rats. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  R. Lin,et al.  Thalamic afferents of the rat barrel cortex: a light- and electron-microscopic study using Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin as an anterograde tracer. , 1993, Somatosensory & motor research.

[8]  Kevin L. Briggman,et al.  Towards neural circuit reconstruction with volume electron microscopy techniques , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[9]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Coincidence detection and changes of synaptic efficacy in spiny stellate neurons in rat barrel cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  H. Markram,et al.  Physiology and anatomy of synaptic connections between thick tufted pyramidal neurones in the developing rat neocortex. , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  M. Brecht,et al.  Monosynaptic Pathway from Rat Vibrissa Motor Cortex to Facial Motor Neurons Revealed by Lentivirus-Based Axonal Tracing , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Bert Sakmann,et al.  Sensory integration across space and in time for decision making in the somatosensory system of rodents , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  J. Lübke,et al.  Morphometric analysis of the columnar innervation domain of neurons connecting layer 4 and layer 2/3 of juvenile rat barrel cortex. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Kevin D Alloway,et al.  Functional circuits mediating sensorimotor integration: Quantitative comparisons of projections from rodent barrel cortex to primary motor cortex, neostriatum, superior colliculus, and the pons , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  R. Silver,et al.  High-Probability Uniquantal Transmission at Excitatory Synapses in Barrel Cortex , 2003, Science.

[16]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Selective attention through phase relationship of excitatory and inhibitory input synchrony in a model cortical neuron , 2006, Neural Networks.

[17]  M. Armstrong‐James,et al.  Flow of excitation within rat barrel cortex on striking a single vibrissa. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Manuel F. Gonzalez,et al.  Multiple vibrissae sensory regions in rat cerebellum: A (14C) 2‐deoxyglucose study , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  R. Silver,et al.  Synaptic connections between layer 4 spiny neurone‐ layer 2/3 pyramidal cell pairs in juvenile rat barrel cortex: physiology and anatomy of interlaminar signalling within a cortical column , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  R. Masterton,et al.  The sensory contribution of a single vibrissa's cortical barrel. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Cpj de Kock,et al.  Layer‐ and cell‐type‐specific suprathreshold stimulus representation in rat primary somatosensory cortex , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  M. Häusser,et al.  Integration of quanta in cerebellar granule cells during sensory processing , 2004, Nature.

[23]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[24]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Synchronous oscillatory activity in sensory systems: new vistas on mechanisms , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[25]  D. Simons.  Response properties of vibrissa units in rat SI somatosensory neocortex. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  J. Bower,et al.  Topographical organization of pathways from somatosensory cortex through the pontine nuclei to tactile regions of the rat cerebellar hemispheres , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  E. Ahissar,et al.  Parallel Thalamic Pathways for Whisking and Touch Signals in the Rat , 2006, PLoS biology.

[28]  T. Woolsey,et al.  The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (S I) of mouse cerebral cortex , 1970 .

[29]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Cortex Is Driven by Weak but Synchronously Active Thalamocortical Synapses , 2006, Science.

[30]  K. Alloway,et al.  Corticostriatal Projections from Rat Barrel Cortex Have an Anisotropic Organization that Correlates with Vibrissal Whisking Behavior , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  J. Lübke,et al.  Reliable synaptic connections between pairs of excitatory layer 4 neurones within a single ‘barrel’ of developing rat somatosensory cortex , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  T. Woolsey,et al.  The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units. , 1970, Brain research.

[33]  R. Izraeli,et al.  Vibrissal motor cortex in the rat: connections with the barrel field , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  K. Alloway,et al.  Organization of corticostriatal projections from the vibrissal representations in the primary motor and somatosensory cortical areas of rodents , 2001, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[35]  J. Lübke,et al.  Efficacy and connectivity of intracolumnar pairs of layer 2/3 pyramidal cells in the barrel cortex of juvenile rats , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  P. Somogyi,et al.  Target-cell-specific facilitation and depression in neocortical circuits , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  A. Keller,et al.  State-dependent gating of sensory inputs by zona incerta. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  B. Sakmann,et al.  A new cellular mechanism for coupling inputs arriving at different cortical layers , 1999, Nature.

[39]  D. Simons,et al.  Spatial organization of thalamocortical and corticothalamic projection systems in the rat SmI barrel cortex , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[40]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Dynamic Receptive Fields of Reconstructed Pyramidal Cells in Layers 3 and 2 of Rat Somatosensory Barrel Cortex , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  B. Sakmann,et al.  ‐Dynamic representation of whisker deflection by synaptic potentials in spiny stellate and pyramidal cells in the barrels and septa of layer 4 rat somatosensory cortex , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  V. Mountcastle.  The columnar organization of the neocortex. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[43]  Bert Sakmann,et al.  Monosynaptic Connections between Pairs of Spiny Stellate Cells in Layer 4 and Pyramidal Cells in Layer 5A Indicate That Lemniscal and Paralemniscal Afferent Pathways Converge in the Infragranular Somatosensory Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Calcium electrogenesis in distal apical dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal cells at a critical frequency of back-propagating action potentials. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.