Differences in foetal heart rate variability from phonocardiography and abdominal electrocardiography

The agreement of the phonocardiographic method to provide foetal heart rate variability (FHRV) indices equivalent to those derived from abdominal electrocardiography was tested. 15 pregnant women were recruited in order to obtain antepartum foetal phonocardiograms and abdominal electrocardiograms three minutes long. From the respective sound (SS) and electric (RR) time series, typical temporal and spectral indices of FHRV were computed and compared. Means of the SS and RR intervals were not significant (P > 0.05) and these showed a correlation r=0.98. However, the temporal indices, P TOT, HF and LF/HF presented differences (P < 0.05), since SS values were higher. Spectral coherence decreased below 0.5 for frequencies above 0.28 - 0.07Hz, where bands resembling maternal and foetal breathing movements were noted. Particularly above 0.28 Hz, temporal and spectral FHRV indices derived from phonocardiography and electrocardiography show differences. Quality of the signal, processing techniques, and maternal and foetal respiratory factors could account to explain these.

[1]  J. Parer,et al.  Validity of mathematical methods of quantitating fetal heart rate variability. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  G S Dawes,et al.  Limitations of antenatal fetal heart rate monitors. , 1990, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  Z. Weiner,et al.  Computerized Analysis of the Fetal Heart Rate , 1995, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  M. R. Ortiz,et al.  Performance of two adaptive subband filtering schemes for processing fetal phonocardiograms: influence of the wavelet and the level of decomposition , 2000, Computers in Cardiology 2000. Vol.27 (Cat. 00CH37163).

[5]  Ferenc Kovács,et al.  A rule-based phonocardiographic method for long-term fetal heart rate monitoring , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  A. J. Zuckerwar,et al.  Development of a piezopolymer pressure sensor for a portable fetal heart rate monitor , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[8]  A. Malliani,et al.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use , 1996 .

[9]  Willis J. Tompkins,et al.  A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  H W Jongsma,et al.  Analysis of heart rate and beat-to-beat variability: Interval difference index. , 1980, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  R. González,et al.  Comparison of the heart rate variability parameters obtained from the electrocardiogram and the blood pressure wave. , 1998, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[12]  R. Goodlin,et al.  History of fetal monitoring. , 1979, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  M. R. Ortiz,et al.  The use of wavelet packets to improve the detection of cardiac sounds from the fetal phonocardiogram , 1999, Computers in Cardiology 1999. Vol.26 (Cat. No.99CH37004).

[14]  P. Stein,et al.  Time domain measurements of heart rate variability. , 1992, Cardiology clinics.

[15]  M Y Divon,et al.  Respiratory sinus arrhythmia in the human fetus. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  G S Dawes,et al.  Criteria for the design of fetal heart rate analysis systems. , 1990, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[17]  J H Dripps,et al.  Real time processing and analysis of fetal phonocardiographic signals. , 1989, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[18]  S. Cerutti,et al.  Spectral analysis of antepartum heart rate variability. , 1989, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[19]  T Solum A comparison of the Three Methods for External Fetal Cardiography , 1980, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[20]  G S Dawes,et al.  A comparison of two fetal heart rate ultrasound detector systems. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  D. G. Talbert,et al.  Wide Bandwidlt Fetal Phonography Using a Sensor Matched to the Compliance of the Mother's Abdominal Wall , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  V. Medina,et al.  Fetal QRS extraction based on wavelet analysis and pattern matching , 1996, Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[23]  Thomas F. Kelly,et al.  A critical appraisal of fetal surveillance , 1996 .

[24]  A. Vintzileos,et al.  Antepartum fetal surveillance. , 1995, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  S Cerutti,et al.  Power spectral analysis of the heart rate of the human fetus at 26 and 36 weeks of gestation. , 1989, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[26]  J. Saul,et al.  Transfer function analysis of autonomic regulation. II. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia. , 1989, The American journal of physiology.