Discourse Coalitions and the Australian Climate Change Policy Network

Ever since the agreement of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, climate change has become the most prominent global environmental issue on domestic political agendas. The author examines how a policy-network approach can contribute to the analysis of domestic climate change responses. Consideration is given to the role of advocacy coalitions and discourse coalitions within policy networks. It is argued that the discourse-coalition approach offers a useful explanation of the processes of coalition formation, interaction, and policy learning. Although it cannot alone explain the outcomes of the policy process, its emphasis on the dynamics of meaning, legitimacy, and knowledge as an essential part of policymaking can usefully be incorporated into an analysis of policy networks.

[1]  P. Kinrade.  Towards Ecologically Sustainable Development: The Role and Shortcomings of Markets , 1995 .

[2]  Edella Schlager,et al.  Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework , 1995 .

[3]  I. Rowlands.  International fairness and justice in addressing global climate change , 1997 .

[4]  Peter Newell,et al.  A climate for business: global warming, the state and capital , 1998 .

[5]  Hank C. Jenkins-Smith,et al.  Evaluating the Advocacy Coalition Framework , 1994, Journal of Public Policy.

[6]  James G. March,et al.  Institutional Perspectives on Political Institutions , 1996 .

[7]  D. Marsh,et al.  Policy Networks in British Politics , 1992 .

[8]  C. Daugbjerg.  Linking Policy Networks and Environmental Policies: Nitrate Policy Making in Denmark and Sweden 1970‐1995 , 1998 .

[9]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  The Precautionary Principle in Contemporary Environmental Politics , 1995, Environmental Values.

[10]  A. Jordan,et al.  Shifting Agendas, Changing Regulatory Structures And The ‘New’ Politics Of Environmental Pollution: British Coastal Water Policy, 1955–1995 , 1998 .

[11]  Global risk, local values?: ‘Risk society’ and the greenhouse issue in Newcastle, Australia , 1997 .

[12]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe , 1998 .

[13]  Granville C. Sewell.  Conflicting beliefs: National implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1996 .

[14]  Tanja A. Börzel,et al.  Organizing Babylon ‐ On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks , 1998 .

[15]  R. Taplin.  Greenhouse: An Overview of Australian Policy and Practice , 1994 .

[16]  M. Hajer.  Acid rain in Great Britain: environmental discourse and the hidden politics of institutional practice , 1995 .

[17]  Peter Christoff,et al.  Ecological Modernisation, Ecological Modernities , 1996, The Ecological Modernisation Reader.

[18]  D. Marsh,et al.  Policy networks in British government , 1992 .

[19]  Michelle. Egan,et al.  Environmental management standards, corporate strategies and policy networks , 1998 .

[20]  D. Marsh,et al.  Policy Communities and Issue Networks , 1992 .

[21]  Keith Dowding,et al.  Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach , 1995 .