Revision surgery following operations for lumbar stenosis.

BACKGROUND For carefully selected patients with lumbar stenosis, decompression surgery is more efficacious than nonoperative treatment. However, some patients undergo repeat surgery, often because of complications, the failure to achieve solid fusion following arthrodesis procedures, or persistent symptoms. We assessed the probability of repeat surgery following operations for the treatment of lumbar stenosis and examined its association with patient age, comorbidity, previous surgery, and the type of surgical procedure. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of Medicare claims. The index operation was performed in 2004 (n = 31,543), with follow-up obtained through 2008. Operations were grouped by complexity as decompression alone, simple arthrodesis (one or two disc levels and a single surgical approach), or complex arthrodesis (more than two disc levels or combined anterior and posterior approach). Reoperation rates were calculated for each follow-up year, and the time to reoperation was analyzed with proportional hazards models. RESULTS The probability of repeat surgery fell with increasing patient age or comorbidity. Aside from age, the strongest predictor was previous lumbar surgery: at four years the reoperation rate was 17.2% among patients who had had lumbar surgery prior to the index operation, compared with 10.6% among those with no prior surgery (p < 0.001). At one year, the reoperation rate for patients who had been managed with decompression alone was slightly higher than that for patients who had been managed with simple arthrodesis, but by four years the rates for these two groups were identical (10.7%) and were lower than the rate for patients who had been managed with complex arthrodesis (13.5%) (p < 0.001). This difference persisted after adjusting for demographic and clinical features (hazard ratio for complex arthrodesis versus decompression 1.56, 95% confidence interval, 1.26 to 1.92). A device-related complication was reported at the time of 29.2% of reoperations following an initial arthrodesis procedure. CONCLUSIONS The likelihood of repeat surgery for spinal stenosis declined with increasing age and comorbidity, perhaps because of concern for greater risks. The strongest clinical predictor of repeat surgery was a lumbar spine operation prior to the index operation. Arthrodeses were not significantly associated with lower rates of repeat surgery after the first postoperative year, and patients who had had complex arthrodeses had the highest rate of reoperations.

[1]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Surgical Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Four-Year Results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial , 2010, Spine.

[2]  R. Deyo,et al.  Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. , 2010, JAMA.

[3]  Brett Hanscom,et al.  Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  John R. Johnson,et al.  Clinical outcomes in older patients after posterolateral lumbar fusion. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[5]  R. Deyo,et al.  Reoperation Rates Following Lumbar Spine Surgery and the Influence of Spinal Fusion Procedures , 2007, Spine.

[6]  Markku Heliövaara,et al.  Surgical or Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2007, Spine.

[7]  James N Weinstein,et al.  United States’ Trends and Regional Variations in Lumbar Spine Surgery: 1992–2003 , 2006, Spine.

[8]  R. Hazard Failed back surgery syndrome: surgical and nonsurgical approaches. , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  H. Quan,et al.  Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data , 2005, Medical care.

[10]  A. Hilibrand,et al.  Variation in Surgical Decision Making for Degenerative Spinal Disorders. Part I: Lumbar Spine , 2005, Spine.

[11]  Robert A Hart,et al.  Variation in Surgical Decision Making For Degenerative Spinal Disorders. Part II: Cervical Spine , 2005, Spine.

[12]  D. Singer,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical and Nonsurgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 8 to 10 Year Results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study , 2005, Spine.

[13]  T. Faciszewski,et al.  Procedural Coding of Spinal Surgeries (CPT-4 versus ICD-9-CM) and Decisions Regarding Standards: A Multicenter Study , 2003, Spine.

[14]  X. Weng,et al.  [Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation]. , 2002, Zhongguo yi xue ke xue yuan xue bao. Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae.

[15]  S. Broste,et al.  Quality of Data Regarding Diagnoses of Spinal Disorders in Administrative Databases. A Multicenter Study* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  S. Jaglal,et al.  A Population‐Based Study of Reoperations After Back Surgery , 1997, Spine.

[17]  Robert A. Lew,et al.  Lumbar Laminectomy Alone or With Instrumented or Noninstrumented Arthrodesis in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Patient Selection, Costs, and Surgical Outcomes , 1997, Spine.

[18]  P Diehr,et al.  Analysis of Automated Administrative and Survey Databases to Study Patterns and Outcomes of Care , 1994, Spine.

[19]  S. Esses,et al.  Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. , 1993, Spine.

[20]  E. Fisher,et al.  The accuracy of Medicare's hospital claims data: progress has been made, but problems remain. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[21]  R. Thisted,et al.  Using a national health care data base to determine surgical complications in community hospitals: lumbar discectomy as an example. , 1989, Neurosurgery.

[22]  E. Rackow Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  G. Moneta,et al.  Endovascular vs. Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Medicare Population , 2009 .