Tactful or Doubtful?

When a statement about the occurrence of a medical condition is qualified by an expression of probability, such as the word possible, listeners interpret the probability of the condition as being higher the more severe the condition. This severity bias can have serious consequences for the well-being of patients. We argue that the bias is due to a misconception of the pragmatic function served by the expression of probability. The more severe the condition, the greater the chance that the listener construes the expression as a politeness marker rather than as an uncertainty marker. When this misconception does not occur, neither should the severity bias. An analysis of interpretations of probability expressions using a membership-function approach validates this account. We discuss the consequences of this bias for the communication of risk within and outside the medical domain.

[1]  Tzur M. Karelitz,et al.  You say "probable" and I say "likely": improving interpersonal communication with verbal probability phrases. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[2]  D. Budescu,et al.  Preferences and reasons for communicating probabilistic information in verbal or numerical terms , 1993 .

[3]  D. Franić,et al.  Communicating The Frequency of Adverse Drug Reactions to Female Patients , 2000 .

[4]  P. Knapp,et al.  Communicating risk of medication side effects: An empirical evaluation of EU recommended terminology , 2003 .

[5]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Direct and indirect scaling of membership functions of probability phrases , 1987 .

[6]  Madeleine Gekiere And I Say , 1986 .

[7]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Predicting the directionality of probability words from their membership functions , 2003 .

[8]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Measuring the Vague Meanings of Probability Terms , 1986 .

[9]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[10]  Madeleine Youmans Cross-cultural Differences in Polite Epistemic Modal Use in American English , 2001 .

[11]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  Contextual Effects in the Interpretations of Probability Words: Perceived Base Rate and Severity of Events , 1990 .

[12]  D. Budescu,et al.  Processing Linguistic Probabilities: General Principles and Empirical Evidence , 1995 .

[13]  Helmut Jungermann,et al.  Rarely occurring headaches and rarely occurring blindness: Is rarely=rarely? The meaning of verbal frequentistic labels in specific medical contexts. , 1996 .

[14]  Communicating Likelihood and Managing Face: Can We Say it is Probable When We Know it to be Certain? , 2005 .

[15]  P. Killeen,et al.  An Alternative to Null-Hypothesis Significance Tests , 2005, Psychological science.

[16]  Anthony J. Sanford,et al.  New Perspectives on the Expression of Quantity , 2003 .

[17]  Wibecke Brun,et al.  Verbal Expressions of Uncertainty and Probability , 2005 .

[18]  E. Goffman Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .