Sociological refigurations of patient safety; ontologies of improvement and 'acting with' quality collaboratives in healthcare.

The increasing focus on patient safety in the field of health policy is accompanied by research programs that articulate the role of the social sciences as one of contributing to enhancing safety in healthcare. Through these programs, new approaches to studying safety are facing a narrow definition of 'usefulness' in which researchers are to discover the factors that support or hamper the implementation of existing policy agendas. This is unfortunate since such claims for useful involvement in predefined policy agendas may undo one of the strongest assets of good social science research: the capacity to complexify the taken-for-granted conceptualizations of the object of study. As an alternative to this definition of 'usefulness', this article proposes a focus on multiple ontologies in the making when studying patient safety. Through such a focus, the role of social scientists becomes the involvement in refiguring the problem space of patient safety, the relations between research subjects and objects, and the existing policy agendas. This role gives medical sociologists the opportunity to focus on the question of which practices of 'effective care' are being enacted through different approaches for dealing with patient safety and what their consequences are for the care practices under study. In order to explore these questions, this article draws on empirical material from an ongoing evaluation of a large quality improvement collaborative for the care sectors in the Netherlands. It addresses how issues like 'effectiveness' and 'client participation' are at present articulated in this collaborative and shows that alternative figurations of these notions dissolve many 'implementation problems' presently experienced. Further it analyzes how such a focus of medical sociology on multiple ontologies engenders new potential for exploring particular spaces for 'acting with' quality improvement agents.

[1]  C. Jensen Sociology, systems and (patient) safety: knowledge translations in healthcare policy. , 2008, Sociology of health & illness.

[2]  Arthas Flabouris,et al.  Narrativizing errors of care: critical incident reporting in clinical practice. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[3]  P. Lindenauer,et al.  Cardiovascular risk tables Estimating risk is not the problem , using it to tailor treatment to individuals , 2008 .

[4]  B. Latour Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern , 2004, Critical Inquiry.

[5]  M. Power Counting, Control and Calculation: Reflections on Measuring and Management , 2004 .

[6]  Robbert Huijsman,et al.  Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[8]  S. Tanenbaum,et al.  Knowing and acting in medical practice: the epistemological politics of outcomes research. , 1994, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[9]  W B Runciman,et al.  ORGANISATIONAL MATTERS: NATIONAL INITIATIVES Lessons from the Australian Patient Safety Foundation: setting up a national patient safety surveillance system—is this the right model? , 2002 .

[10]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The essential tension : selected studies in scientific tradition and change , 1977 .

[11]  R. Bal,et al.  Engaging with Technologies in Practice: Travelling the Northwest Passage , 2007 .

[12]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[13]  A. Mol Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions , 1999 .

[14]  M. Scriven Evaluation thesaurus, 4th ed. , 1991 .

[15]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  Turning the medical gaze in upon itself: root cause analysis and the investigation of clinical error. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[16]  J. Mesman,et al.  Disturbing Observations as a Basis for Collaborative Research , 2007 .

[17]  M. Power The audit society : rituals of verification , 1999 .

[18]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Georgina Born,et al.  Logics of interdisciplinarity , 2008 .

[20]  Richard Vidgen,et al.  Technology transfer: diffusion or translation? , 1997 .

[21]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research , 2006 .

[22]  D. Hess Ethnography and the Development of Science and Technology Studies , 2001 .

[23]  Julie L. Ozanne,et al.  Community Action Research , 2010 .

[24]  John Krige,et al.  Science in the twentieth century , 2000 .

[25]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[26]  C. Jensen Sorting Attachments: Usefulness of STS in Healthcare Practice and Policy , 2007 .

[27]  P. Aspden Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care , 2004 .

[28]  D Gustafson,et al.  Evaluation of quality improvement programmes , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[29]  Thomas S. Kuhn,et al.  The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science , 1961, Isis.

[30]  A. Donabedian Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. , 1966, The Milbank quarterly.

[31]  Tiago Moreira,et al.  Technogovernance: evidence, subjectivity, and the clinical encounter in primary care medicine. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[32]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[33]  S Cretin,et al.  Quality collaboratives: lessons from research , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[34]  R. Grol,et al.  Finding safety in medical education , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[35]  T. Zuiderent-Jerak Preventing Implementation: Exploring Interventions with Standardization in Healthcare , 2007 .

[36]  A. Mol The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .

[37]  L. Donaldson Championing patient safety: going global , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[38]  P. Atkinson Handbook of ethnography , 2001 .

[39]  Carl Rhodes,et al.  Surveillance, Resistance, Observance: Exploring the Teleo-affective Volatility of Workplace Interaction , 2006 .

[40]  T. Zuiderent-Jerak Competition in the Wild , 2009 .

[41]  C M Kilo,et al.  A Framework for Collaborative Improvement: Lessons from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Breakthrough Series , 1998, Quality management in health care.

[42]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Facilitating Technology Transfer through Partnership , 1997, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology.

[43]  D W Bates,et al.  Developing and implementing new safe practices: voluntary adoption through statewide collaboratives , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[44]  N. Britten,et al.  Using Reflexivity to Optimize Teamwork in Qualitative Research , 1999, Qualitative health research.

[45]  Paul Bate,et al.  Studying Health Care “Quality” Qualitatively: The Dilemmas and Tensions between Different Forms of Evaluation Research within the U.K. National Health Service , 2002, Qualitative health research.

[46]  Brian S Mittman,et al.  Creating the Evidence Base for Quality Improvement Collaboratives , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[47]  Jacqueline Carroll,et al.  Get Real , 2004 .

[48]  S. Tanenbaum Evidence-based practice as mental health policy: three controversies and a caveat. , 2005, Health affairs.

[49]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[50]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  Facilitating Technology Transfer Through Partnership : Learning from Practice and Research , 1997 .

[51]  P. Hawe,et al.  Contested ground: how should qualitative evidence inform the conduct of a community intervention trial? , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.